Skip to Content
Main content

AVON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

127

27%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

101

39%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

52

32%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

110

25%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

79

28%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

102

23%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

63

23%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

25

89%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

54

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

61

46%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

43

49%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.