Skip to Content
Main content

ARDSLEY UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

113

12%

LEVEL 2

322

35%

LEVEL 3

338

37%

LEVEL 4

140

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 874

LEVEL 1

114

13%

LEVEL 2

326

37%

LEVEL 3

304

35%

LEVEL 4

130

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

246
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

163

39%

LEVEL 4

83

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

228
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

150

38%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

232
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

81

16%

LEVEL 2

180

37%

LEVEL 3

175

35%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

206
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

83

17%

LEVEL 2

195

40%

LEVEL 3

154

32%

LEVEL 4

52

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

122
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

73

43%

LEVEL 4

49

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

109
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

71

43%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

299
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

73

12%

LEVEL 2

233

39%

LEVEL 3

220

36%

LEVEL 4

79

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

262
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

230

41%

LEVEL 3

193

34%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

41

41%

LEVEL 3

37

37%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

37

33%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

471
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 810

LEVEL 1

57

7%

LEVEL 2

282

35%

LEVEL 3

333

41%

LEVEL 4

138

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

428
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 789

LEVEL 1

61

8%

LEVEL 2

300

38%

LEVEL 3

299

38%

LEVEL 4

129

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

56

54%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

53

62%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

434
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 869

LEVEL 1

111

13%

LEVEL 2

324

37%

LEVEL 3

304

35%

LEVEL 4

130

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

467
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 865

LEVEL 1

99

11%

LEVEL 2

299

35%

LEVEL 3

327

38%

LEVEL 4

140

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

418
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 814

LEVEL 1

92

11%

LEVEL 2

304

37%

LEVEL 3

291

36%

LEVEL 4

127

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

23

48%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.