Skip to Content
Main content

PULASKI CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

189

39%

LEVEL 2

200

41%

LEVEL 3

86

18%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

172

40%

LEVEL 2

172

40%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

84

42%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

118

46%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

105

46%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

183

39%

LEVEL 2

193

41%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

170

41%

LEVEL 2

169

40%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

133

31%

LEVEL 2

191

45%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

126

34%

LEVEL 2

160

43%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

56

86%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

46

79%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

123

43%

LEVEL 2

122

43%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

113

50%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.