Skip to Content
Main content

FALCONER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

151

31%

LEVEL 2

207

42%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

111

32%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

101

37%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

137

30%

LEVEL 2

192

42%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

103

31%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

10

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

113

26%

LEVEL 2

198

45%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

75

25%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

38

78%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

36

90%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

110

43%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

98

41%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

88

45%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.