Skip to Content
Main content

PALMYRA-MACEDON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

253

37%

LEVEL 2

226

33%

LEVEL 3

163

24%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

262

36%

LEVEL 2

291

40%

LEVEL 3

132

18%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

151

43%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

162

42%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

220

35%

LEVEL 2

206

33%

LEVEL 3

156

25%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

232

35%

LEVEL 2

264

40%

LEVEL 3

125

19%

LEVEL 4

42

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

173

29%

LEVEL 2

220

37%

LEVEL 3

163

27%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

177

28%

LEVEL 2

280

44%

LEVEL 3

132

21%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

80

93%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

85

88%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

99

25%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

122

31%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

110

26%

LEVEL 2

175

42%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

154

52%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

152

50%

LEVEL 2

116

38%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.