Skip to Content
Main content

SCHALMONT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

160

28%

LEVEL 2

208

36%

LEVEL 3

169

29%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

156

27%

LEVEL 2

236

40%

LEVEL 3

142

24%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

138

27%

LEVEL 2

186

37%

LEVEL 3

146

29%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

134

26%

LEVEL 2

207

41%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

111

21%

LEVEL 2

201

39%

LEVEL 3

167

32%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

104

20%

LEVEL 2

230

44%

LEVEL 3

140

27%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

49

84%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

82

19%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

143

34%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

89

20%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

78

50%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.