Skip to Content
Main content

PHELPS-CLIFTON SPRINGS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

217

37%

LEVEL 2

204

35%

LEVEL 3

126

22%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

216

37%

LEVEL 2

218

37%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

126

43%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

131

45%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

189

36%

LEVEL 2

191

36%

LEVEL 3

120

23%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

197

37%

LEVEL 2

194

37%

LEVEL 3

112

21%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

16

50%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

130

27%

LEVEL 2

190

40%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

135

28%

LEVEL 2

192

41%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

87

84%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

81

74%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

211

37%

LEVEL 2

202

35%

LEVEL 3

126

22%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

209

36%

LEVEL 2

217

38%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

117

49%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

123

46%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.