Skip to Content
Main content

AVON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

158

37%

LEVEL 2

136

32%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

140

37%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

93

26%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

154

37%

LEVEL 2

134

32%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

72

28%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

59

48%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

86

52%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

130
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

148

36%

LEVEL 2

134

33%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.