Skip to Content
Main content

POTSDAM CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

129

23%

LEVEL 2

184

33%

LEVEL 3

164

29%

LEVEL 4

86

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

147

28%

LEVEL 2

133

25%

LEVEL 3

149

28%

LEVEL 4

104

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

89

29%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

9

64%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

121

23%

LEVEL 2

173

33%

LEVEL 3

151

29%

LEVEL 4

82

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

136

27%

LEVEL 2

124

25%

LEVEL 3

136

27%

LEVEL 4

99

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

71

15%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

158

33%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

79

18%

LEVEL 2

114

26%

LEVEL 3

146

33%

LEVEL 4

102

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

58

66%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

68

74%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

249
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

144

27%

LEVEL 2

131

25%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

103

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

80

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

86

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

95

43%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

249
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

126

23%

LEVEL 2

180

32%

LEVEL 3

163

29%

LEVEL 4

86

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

251
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

144

28%

LEVEL 2

128

24%

LEVEL 3

148

28%

LEVEL 4

103

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.