Skip to Content
Main content

PHELPS-CLIFTON SPRINGS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

180

32%

LEVEL 2

224

39%

LEVEL 3

145

26%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

233

39%

LEVEL 2

222

37%

LEVEL 3

120

20%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

73

26%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

117

40%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

138

43%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

159

31%

LEVEL 2

201

39%

LEVEL 3

132

26%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

204

38%

LEVEL 2

198

37%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

22

51%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

123

26%

LEVEL 2

200

41%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

156

31%

LEVEL 2

202

40%

LEVEL 3

118

23%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

57

66%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

77

78%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

173

31%

LEVEL 2

221

40%

LEVEL 3

142

26%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

224

38%

LEVEL 2

218

37%

LEVEL 3

120

20%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

123

41%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

100

31%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

107

40%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

133

47%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

226

38%

LEVEL 2

221

37%

LEVEL 3

120

20%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.