Skip to Content
Main content

FONDA-FULTONVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

102

18%

LEVEL 2

203

36%

LEVEL 3

191

34%

LEVEL 4

72

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

112

20%

LEVEL 2

180

32%

LEVEL 3

186

33%

LEVEL 4

87

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

67

23%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

246
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

98

18%

LEVEL 2

192

36%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

260
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

104

20%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

181

34%

LEVEL 4

79

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

173

35%

LEVEL 3

180

36%

LEVEL 4

71

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

177

36%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

32

43%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

42

55%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

65

29%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

260
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

100

18%

LEVEL 2

200

36%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

270
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

110

20%

LEVEL 2

177

32%

LEVEL 3

184

33%

LEVEL 4

86

15%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

271
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

110

20%

LEVEL 2

179

32%

LEVEL 3

184

33%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.