Skip to Content
Main content

AUBURN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,273

LEVEL 1

486

38%

LEVEL 2

449

35%

LEVEL 3

278

22%

LEVEL 4

60

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,447

LEVEL 1

549

38%

LEVEL 2

509

35%

LEVEL 3

318

22%

LEVEL 4

71

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

187

31%

LEVEL 2

226

37%

LEVEL 3

158

26%

LEVEL 4

38

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

213
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

228

34%

LEVEL 2

239

35%

LEVEL 3

170

25%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

299

45%

LEVEL 2

223

34%

LEVEL 3

120

18%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

321

42%

LEVEL 2

270

35%

LEVEL 3

148

19%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

59

47%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

278
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 974

LEVEL 1

342

35%

LEVEL 2

354

36%

LEVEL 3

227

23%

LEVEL 4

51

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

323
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,117

LEVEL 1

392

35%

LEVEL 2

402

36%

LEVEL 3

262

23%

LEVEL 4

61

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

46

56%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

46

58%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

36

47%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,101

LEVEL 1

347

32%

LEVEL 2

419

38%

LEVEL 3

275

25%

LEVEL 4

60

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

377
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,241

LEVEL 1

404

33%

LEVEL 2

460

37%

LEVEL 3

307

25%

LEVEL 4

70

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

139

81%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

145

70%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

118

23%

LEVEL 2

182

36%

LEVEL 3

170

33%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

120

22%

LEVEL 2

200

37%

LEVEL 3

176

32%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 762

LEVEL 1

368

48%

LEVEL 2

267

35%

LEVEL 3

108

14%

LEVEL 4

19

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 904

LEVEL 1

429

47%

LEVEL 2

309

34%

LEVEL 3

142

16%

LEVEL 4

24

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

330
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,224

LEVEL 1

466

38%

LEVEL 2

428

35%

LEVEL 3

271

22%

LEVEL 4

59

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

385
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,408

LEVEL 1

531

38%

LEVEL 2

492

35%

LEVEL 3

314

22%

LEVEL 4

71

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.