Skip to Content
Main content

JOHNSON CITY ELEM/INTRMED SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

188

36%

LEVEL 2

196

38%

LEVEL 3

115

22%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

153

31%

LEVEL 2

189

39%

LEVEL 3

118

24%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

99

41%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

99

39%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

32

52%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

15

28%

LEVEL 2

26

49%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

40

58%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

24

42%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

30

48%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

30

42%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

149

32%

LEVEL 2

181

39%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

115

27%

LEVEL 2

175

41%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

39

66%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

38

68%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

137
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

174

36%

LEVEL 2

178

36%

LEVEL 3

115

24%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

144
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

177

39%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

18

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

22

65%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

165

42%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

120

36%

LEVEL 2

135

41%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

181

36%

LEVEL 2

194

38%

LEVEL 3

113

22%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.