Skip to Content
Main content

PHOENIX CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

141

23%

LEVEL 2

177

28%

LEVEL 3

187

30%

LEVEL 4

119

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

145

23%

LEVEL 2

171

27%

LEVEL 3

200

32%

LEVEL 4

118

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

85

28%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

117

35%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

292
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

131

22%

LEVEL 2

168

28%

LEVEL 3

175

30%

LEVEL 4

117

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

302
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

139

23%

LEVEL 2

162

27%

LEVEL 3

189

31%

LEVEL 4

113

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

166

30%

LEVEL 3

180

32%

LEVEL 4

119

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

96

17%

LEVEL 2

164

29%

LEVEL 3

192

34%

LEVEL 4

118

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

46

72%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

49

77%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

111

38%

LEVEL 4

75

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

97

29%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

300
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

133

22%

LEVEL 2

168

28%

LEVEL 3

183

30%

LEVEL 4

117

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

314
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

135

22%

LEVEL 2

166

27%

LEVEL 3

196

32%

LEVEL 4

118

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.