MONTICELLO CSD - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
4%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
11%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
4%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
11%
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
5
6
45
100
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
Principals
5
Assistant Principals
6
Other Professional Staff
45
Paraprofessionals
100
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS
282
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
2%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
16%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
698
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
994
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 282
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
2%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
16%
Total Number of Core Classes
698
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
994
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
214
175
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
192
175
17
REGENTS DIPLOMA
174
91%
166
95%
8
47%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
45
23%
45
26%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
15
8%
11
6%
4
24%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
18
9%
9
5%
9
53%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
22
10%
0
0%
22
56%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
214
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
192
Regents Diploma
174
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
45
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
15
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
18
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
22
10%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
175
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
175
Regents Diploma
166
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
45
26%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
11
6%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
17
Regents Diploma
8
47%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
24%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
53%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
22
56%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
214
175
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
192
175
17
REGENTS DIPLOMA
174
91%
166
95%
8
47%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
45
23%
45
26%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
15
8%
11
6%
4
24%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
18
9%
9
5%
9
53%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
22
10%
0
0%
22
56%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
214
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
192
Regents Diploma
174
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
45
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
15
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
18
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
22
10%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
175
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
175
Regents Diploma
166
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
45
26%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
11
6%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
17
Regents Diploma
8
47%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
24%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
53%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
22
56%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
214
175
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
192
175
17
REGENTS DIPLOMA
174
91%
166
95%
8
47%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
45
23%
45
26%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
15
8%
11
6%
4
24%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
18
9%
9
5%
9
53%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
22
10%
0
0%
22
56%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
214
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
192
Regents Diploma
174
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
45
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
15
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
18
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
22
10%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
175
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
175
Regents Diploma
166
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
45
26%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
11
6%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
17
Regents Diploma
8
47%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
24%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
53%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
22
56%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
24
3%
17
2%
7
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
18
2%
16
2%
2
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
42
4%
33
4%
9
5%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
24
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
18
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
42
4%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
17
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
16
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
33
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
24
3%
17
2%
7
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
18
2%
16
2%
2
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
42
4%
33
4%
9
5%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
24
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
18
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
42
4%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
17
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
16
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
33
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
24
3%
17
2%
7
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
18
2%
16
2%
2
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
42
4%
33
4%
9
5%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
24
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
18
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
42
4%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
17
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
16
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
33
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
75
35%
72
41%
3
8%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
82
38%
71
41%
11
28%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
3%
TO THE MILITARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
24
11%
18
10%
6
15%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
9
4%
6
3%
3
8%
PLANS UNKNOWN
20
9%
6
3%
14
36%
All Students
To Four-Year College
75
35%
To Two-Year College
82
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
2
1%
To Employment
24
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
9
4%
Plan Unknown
20
9%
General Education
To Four-Year College
72
41%
To Two-Year College
71
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
18
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
6
3%
Plan Unknown
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
8%
To Two-Year College
11
28%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
8%
Plan Unknown
14
36%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
75
35%
72
41%
3
8%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
82
38%
71
41%
11
28%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
3%
TO THE MILITARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
24
11%
18
10%
6
15%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
9
4%
6
3%
3
8%
PLANS UNKNOWN
20
9%
6
3%
14
36%
All Students
To Four-Year College
75
35%
To Two-Year College
82
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
2
1%
To Employment
24
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
9
4%
Plan Unknown
20
9%
General Education
To Four-Year College
72
41%
To Two-Year College
71
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
18
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
6
3%
Plan Unknown
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
8%
To Two-Year College
11
28%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
8%
Plan Unknown
14
36%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
75
35%
72
41%
3
8%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
82
38%
71
41%
11
28%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
3%
TO THE MILITARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
24
11%
18
10%
6
15%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
9
4%
6
3%
3
8%
PLANS UNKNOWN
20
9%
6
3%
14
36%
All Students
To Four-Year College
75
35%
To Two-Year College
82
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
2
1%
To Employment
24
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
9
4%
Plan Unknown
20
9%
General Education
To Four-Year College
72
41%
To Two-Year College
71
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
18
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
6
3%
Plan Unknown
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
8%
To Two-Year College
11
28%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
8%
Plan Unknown
14
36%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
115
53%
LEVEL 2
73
34%
LEVEL 3
26
12%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 195
LEVEL 1
97
50%
LEVEL 2
70
36%
LEVEL 3
26
13%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
18
86%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
35
70%
LEVEL 2
13
26%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
26
46%
LEVEL 2
23
41%
LEVEL 3
7
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
51
51%
LEVEL 2
30
30%
LEVEL 3
17
17%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
7
70%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
52
51%
LEVEL 2
35
35%
LEVEL 3
14
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
63
55%
LEVEL 2
38
33%
LEVEL 3
12
10%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 204
LEVEL 1
106
52%
LEVEL 2
70
34%
LEVEL 3
26
13%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
9
75%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
87
61%
LEVEL 2
46
32%
LEVEL 3
10
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
28
38%
LEVEL 2
27
37%
LEVEL 3
16
22%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 215
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
216
195
21
50
56
100
10
101
115
204
12
143
73
1
215
PROFICIENT
13%
14%
0%
4%
13%
19%
0%
14%
12%
14%
0%
7%
25%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
115
53%
97
50%
18
86%
35
70%
26
46%
51
51%
3
30%
52
51%
63
55%
106
52%
9
75%
87
61%
28
38%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
73
34%
70
36%
3
14%
13
26%
23
41%
30
30%
7
70%
35
35%
38
33%
70
34%
3
25%
46
32%
27
37%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
26
12%
26
13%
0
0%
2
4%
7
13%
17
17%
0
0%
14
14%
12
10%
26
13%
0
0%
10
7%
16
22%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
0
0%
0
0%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 279
All Students
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 241
LEVEL 1
130
54%
LEVEL 2
85
35%
LEVEL 3
24
10%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
95
46%
LEVEL 2
84
41%
LEVEL 3
24
12%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
35
97%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
33
70%
LEVEL 2
10
21%
LEVEL 3
3
6%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
32
57%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
61
48%
LEVEL 2
49
39%
LEVEL 3
16
13%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
51
45%
LEVEL 2
45
40%
LEVEL 3
15
13%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
79
62%
LEVEL 2
40
31%
LEVEL 3
9
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 219
LEVEL 1
117
53%
LEVEL 2
76
35%
LEVEL 3
24
11%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
13
59%
LEVEL 2
9
41%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 170
LEVEL 1
105
62%
LEVEL 2
54
32%
LEVEL 3
10
6%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
25
35%
LEVEL 2
31
44%
LEVEL 3
14
20%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 238
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
241
205
36
5
47
56
127
6
113
128
219
22
170
71
3
238
PROFICIENT
11%
13%
0%
60%
9%
4%
13%
0%
15%
7%
12%
0%
6%
21%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
130
54%
95
46%
35
97%
0
0%
33
70%
32
57%
61
48%
4
67%
51
45%
79
62%
117
53%
13
59%
105
62%
25
35%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
85
35%
84
41%
1
3%
2
40%
10
21%
22
39%
49
39%
2
33%
45
40%
40
31%
76
35%
9
41%
54
32%
31
44%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
24
10%
24
12%
0
0%
3
60%
3
6%
2
4%
16
13%
0
0%
15
13%
9
7%
24
11%
0
0%
10
6%
14
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
2
2%
0
0%
2
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 282
All Students
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 194
LEVEL 1
107
55%
LEVEL 2
62
32%
LEVEL 3
22
11%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
75
48%
LEVEL 2
56
36%
LEVEL 3
22
14%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
32
84%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
39
72%
LEVEL 2
11
20%
LEVEL 3
4
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
27
56%
LEVEL 2
15
31%
LEVEL 3
6
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
38
47%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
LEVEL 3
10
12%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
44
45%
LEVEL 2
37
38%
LEVEL 3
14
14%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
63
65%
LEVEL 2
25
26%
LEVEL 3
8
8%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 184
LEVEL 1
99
54%
LEVEL 2
60
33%
LEVEL 3
22
12%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
8
80%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
85
63%
LEVEL 2
40
30%
LEVEL 3
10
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
22
37%
LEVEL 2
22
37%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
194
156
38
1
7
54
48
81
3
11
97
97
184
10
135
59
4
190
PROFICIENT
13%
16%
0%
_%
_%
7%
13%
15%
_%
27%
16%
9%
14%
0%
7%
25%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
107
55%
75
48%
32
84%
_
_
_
_
39
72%
27
56%
38
47%
_
_
3
27%
44
45%
63
65%
99
54%
8
80%
85
63%
22
37%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
62
32%
56
36%
6
16%
_
_
_
_
11
20%
15
31%
31
38%
_
_
5
45%
37
38%
25
26%
60
33%
2
20%
40
30%
22
37%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
22
11%
22
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
7%
6
13%
10
12%
_
_
2
18%
14
14%
8
8%
22
12%
0
0%
10
7%
12
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
3
2%
3
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
1
9%
2
2%
1
1%
3
2%
0
0%
0
0%
3
5%
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 288
All Students
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 231
LEVEL 1
96
42%
LEVEL 2
97
42%
LEVEL 3
26
11%
LEVEL 4
12
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 198
LEVEL 1
65
33%
LEVEL 2
95
48%
LEVEL 3
26
13%
LEVEL 4
12
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
31
94%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
26
48%
LEVEL 2
24
44%
LEVEL 3
3
6%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
22
41%
LEVEL 2
26
48%
LEVEL 3
4
7%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
White
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
45
39%
LEVEL 2
43
38%
LEVEL 3
17
15%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
36
32%
LEVEL 2
58
52%
LEVEL 3
11
10%
LEVEL 4
7
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
60
50%
LEVEL 2
39
33%
LEVEL 3
15
13%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 227
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 158
LEVEL 1
74
47%
LEVEL 2
69
44%
LEVEL 3
12
8%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
28
38%
LEVEL 3
14
19%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
231
198
33
1
54
54
114
8
9
112
119
227
4
158
73
1
230
PROFICIENT
16%
19%
0%
_%
7%
11%
23%
_%
22%
16%
17%
_%
_%
9%
32%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
96
42%
65
33%
31
94%
_
_
26
48%
22
41%
45
39%
_
_
3
33%
36
32%
60
50%
_
_
_
_
74
47%
22
30%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
97
42%
95
48%
2
6%
_
_
24
44%
26
48%
43
38%
_
_
4
44%
58
52%
39
33%
_
_
_
_
69
44%
28
38%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
26
11%
26
13%
0
0%
_
_
3
6%
4
7%
17
15%
_
_
2
22%
11
10%
15
13%
_
_
_
_
12
8%
14
19%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
12
5%
12
6%
0
0%
_
_
1
2%
2
4%
9
8%
_
_
0
0%
7
6%
5
4%
_
_
_
_
3
2%
9
12%
_
_
_
_
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 259
LEVEL 1
132
51%
LEVEL 2
79
31%
LEVEL 3
41
16%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 221
LEVEL 1
96
43%
LEVEL 2
77
35%
LEVEL 3
41
19%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
36
95%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
37
58%
LEVEL 2
20
31%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
37
64%
LEVEL 2
14
24%
LEVEL 3
6
10%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
White
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
55
43%
LEVEL 2
40
31%
LEVEL 3
27
21%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
53
43%
LEVEL 2
37
30%
LEVEL 3
27
22%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
79
58%
LEVEL 2
42
31%
LEVEL 3
14
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 244
LEVEL 1
117
48%
LEVEL 2
79
32%
LEVEL 3
41
17%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
15
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 152
LEVEL 1
99
65%
LEVEL 2
36
24%
LEVEL 3
16
11%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
33
31%
LEVEL 2
43
40%
LEVEL 3
25
23%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 255
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
259
221
38
1
6
64
58
128
2
9
123
136
244
15
152
107
4
255
PROFICIENT
19%
22%
0%
_%
_%
11%
12%
26%
_%
11%
27%
11%
20%
0%
11%
29%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
132
51%
96
43%
36
95%
_
_
_
_
37
58%
37
64%
55
43%
_
_
3
33%
53
43%
79
58%
117
48%
15
100%
99
65%
33
31%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
79
31%
77
35%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
20
31%
14
24%
40
31%
_
_
5
56%
37
30%
42
31%
79
32%
0
0%
36
24%
43
40%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
41
16%
41
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
11%
6
10%
27
21%
_
_
1
11%
27
22%
14
10%
41
17%
0
0%
16
11%
25
23%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
7
3%
7
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
6
5%
_
_
0
0%
6
5%
1
1%
7
3%
0
0%
1
1%
6
6%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 236
LEVEL 1
105
44%
LEVEL 2
84
36%
LEVEL 3
41
17%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 193
LEVEL 1
67
35%
LEVEL 2
80
41%
LEVEL 3
40
21%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
38
88%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
33
57%
LEVEL 2
19
33%
LEVEL 3
6
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
26
53%
LEVEL 2
16
33%
LEVEL 3
6
12%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
White
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
43
36%
LEVEL 2
46
38%
LEVEL 3
27
22%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
46
40%
LEVEL 2
45
39%
LEVEL 3
19
17%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
59
48%
LEVEL 2
39
32%
LEVEL 3
22
18%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
99
43%
LEVEL 2
84
37%
LEVEL 3
41
18%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
81
50%
LEVEL 2
60
37%
LEVEL 3
19
12%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
24
32%
LEVEL 2
24
32%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
236
193
43
5
58
49
121
3
8
114
122
230
6
161
75
1
235
PROFICIENT
20%
24%
2%
_%
10%
14%
26%
_%
25%
20%
20%
20%
0%
12%
36%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
105
44%
67
35%
38
88%
_
_
33
57%
26
53%
43
36%
_
_
3
38%
46
40%
59
48%
99
43%
6
100%
81
50%
24
32%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
84
36%
80
41%
4
9%
_
_
19
33%
16
33%
46
38%
_
_
3
38%
45
39%
39
32%
84
37%
0
0%
60
37%
24
32%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
41
17%
40
21%
1
2%
_
_
6
10%
6
12%
27
22%
_
_
2
25%
19
17%
22
18%
41
18%
0
0%
19
12%
22
29%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
6
3%
6
3%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
5
4%
_
_
0
0%
4
4%
2
2%
6
3%
0
0%
1
1%
5
7%
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 278
All Students
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 218
LEVEL 1
119
55%
LEVEL 2
75
34%
LEVEL 3
19
9%
LEVEL 4
5
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 198
LEVEL 1
106
54%
LEVEL 2
69
35%
LEVEL 3
18
9%
LEVEL 4
5
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
13
65%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
40
78%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
3
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
38
68%
LEVEL 2
15
27%
LEVEL 3
3
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
39
38%
LEVEL 2
46
45%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
58
56%
LEVEL 2
34
33%
LEVEL 3
8
8%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
61
53%
LEVEL 2
41
36%
LEVEL 3
11
10%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
109
53%
LEVEL 2
72
35%
LEVEL 3
19
9%
LEVEL 4
5
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
10
77%
LEVEL 2
3
23%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 145
LEVEL 1
94
65%
LEVEL 2
45
31%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
25
34%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
13
18%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 217
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
218
198
20
51
56
102
9
103
115
205
13
145
73
1
217
PROFICIENT
11%
12%
5%
6%
5%
17%
11%
11%
11%
12%
0%
4%
25%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
119
55%
106
54%
13
65%
40
78%
38
68%
39
38%
2
22%
58
56%
61
53%
109
53%
10
77%
94
65%
25
34%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
75
34%
69
35%
6
30%
8
16%
15
27%
46
45%
6
67%
34
33%
41
36%
72
35%
3
23%
45
31%
30
41%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
19
9%
18
9%
1
5%
3
6%
3
5%
12
12%
1
11%
8
8%
11
10%
19
9%
0
0%
6
4%
13
18%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
5
2%
5
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
5%
0
0%
3
3%
2
2%
5
2%
0
0%
0
0%
5
7%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 275
All Students
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 224
LEVEL 1
130
58%
LEVEL 2
68
30%
LEVEL 3
19
8%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 188
LEVEL 1
97
52%
LEVEL 2
65
35%
LEVEL 3
19
10%
LEVEL 4
7
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
33
92%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
30
71%
LEVEL 2
9
21%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
34
69%
LEVEL 2
13
27%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
62
51%
LEVEL 2
42
34%
LEVEL 3
14
11%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
57
54%
LEVEL 2
35
33%
LEVEL 3
9
9%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
73
61%
LEVEL 2
33
28%
LEVEL 3
10
8%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 202
LEVEL 1
113
56%
LEVEL 2
63
31%
LEVEL 3
19
9%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
17
77%
LEVEL 2
5
23%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
105
67%
LEVEL 2
44
28%
LEVEL 3
7
4%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
25
37%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
12
18%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 221
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
224
188
36
5
42
49
122
6
105
119
202
22
157
67
3
221
PROFICIENT
12%
14%
0%
60%
7%
4%
15%
0%
12%
11%
13%
0%
5%
27%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
130
58%
97
52%
33
92%
1
20%
30
71%
34
69%
62
51%
3
50%
57
54%
73
61%
113
56%
17
77%
105
67%
25
37%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
68
30%
65
35%
3
8%
1
20%
9
21%
13
27%
42
34%
3
50%
35
33%
33
28%
63
31%
5
23%
44
28%
24
36%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
19
8%
19
10%
0
0%
1
20%
2
5%
2
4%
14
11%
0
0%
9
9%
10
8%
19
9%
0
0%
7
4%
12
18%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
7
3%
7
4%
0
0%
2
40%
1
2%
0
0%
4
3%
0
0%
4
4%
3
3%
7
3%
0
0%
1
1%
6
9%
_
_
_
_
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 280
All Students
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 195
LEVEL 1
127
65%
LEVEL 2
43
22%
LEVEL 3
23
12%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
91
58%
LEVEL 2
41
26%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
36
95%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
42
78%
LEVEL 2
9
17%
LEVEL 3
3
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
35
70%
LEVEL 2
9
18%
LEVEL 3
5
10%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
White
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
45
56%
LEVEL 2
23
29%
LEVEL 3
12
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
59
61%
LEVEL 2
25
26%
LEVEL 3
12
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
68
69%
LEVEL 2
18
18%
LEVEL 3
11
11%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 184
LEVEL 1
117
64%
LEVEL 2
42
23%
LEVEL 3
23
13%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
10
91%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
101
74%
LEVEL 2
23
17%
LEVEL 3
11
8%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
26
44%
LEVEL 2
20
34%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 191
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
195
157
38
1
7
54
50
80
3
11
96
99
184
11
136
59
4
191
PROFICIENT
13%
16%
0%
_%
_%
6%
12%
15%
_%
36%
13%
13%
14%
0%
9%
22%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
127
65%
91
58%
36
95%
_
_
_
_
42
78%
35
70%
45
56%
_
_
5
45%
59
61%
68
69%
117
64%
10
91%
101
74%
26
44%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
43
22%
41
26%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
9
17%
9
18%
23
29%
_
_
2
18%
25
26%
18
18%
42
23%
1
9%
23
17%
20
34%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
23
12%
23
15%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
6%
5
10%
12
15%
_
_
3
27%
12
13%
11
11%
23
13%
0
0%
11
8%
12
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
1
9%
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 283
All Students
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
96
42%
LEVEL 2
116
50%
LEVEL 3
16
7%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 198
LEVEL 1
65
33%
LEVEL 2
115
58%
LEVEL 3
16
8%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
31
97%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
28
53%
LEVEL 2
24
45%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
27
50%
LEVEL 2
25
46%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
38
33%
LEVEL 2
61
54%
LEVEL 3
13
11%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
55
49%
LEVEL 2
48
43%
LEVEL 3
8
7%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Male
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
41
35%
LEVEL 2
68
58%
LEVEL 3
8
7%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 226
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
79
50%
LEVEL 2
72
46%
LEVEL 3
5
3%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
17
23%
LEVEL 2
44
60%
LEVEL 3
11
15%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 229
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
230
198
32
1
53
54
114
8
9
112
118
226
4
157
73
1
229
PROFICIENT
8%
9%
0%
_%
2%
4%
13%
_%
0%
8%
8%
_%
_%
4%
16%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
96
42%
65
33%
31
97%
_
_
28
53%
27
50%
38
33%
_
_
3
33%
55
49%
41
35%
_
_
_
_
79
50%
17
23%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
116
50%
115
58%
1
3%
_
_
24
45%
25
46%
61
54%
_
_
6
67%
48
43%
68
58%
_
_
_
_
72
46%
44
60%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
16
7%
16
8%
0
0%
_
_
1
2%
2
4%
13
11%
_
_
0
0%
8
7%
8
7%
_
_
_
_
5
3%
11
15%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 282
All Students
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 257
LEVEL 1
159
62%
LEVEL 2
76
30%
LEVEL 3
20
8%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
124
56%
LEVEL 2
74
34%
LEVEL 3
20
9%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
35
95%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
50
78%
LEVEL 2
13
20%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
40
70%
LEVEL 2
15
26%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
64
50%
LEVEL 2
45
35%
LEVEL 3
16
13%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
70
57%
LEVEL 2
38
31%
LEVEL 3
13
11%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Male
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
89
66%
LEVEL 2
38
28%
LEVEL 3
7
5%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 242
LEVEL 1
145
60%
LEVEL 2
75
31%
LEVEL 3
20
8%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
14
93%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
111
74%
LEVEL 2
32
21%
LEVEL 3
7
5%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
48
45%
LEVEL 2
44
42%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
257
220
37
1
6
64
57
127
2
9
122
135
242
15
151
106
4
253
PROFICIENT
9%
10%
0%
_%
_%
2%
4%
14%
_%
11%
11%
6%
9%
0%
5%
13%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
159
62%
124
56%
35
95%
_
_
_
_
50
78%
40
70%
64
50%
_
_
5
56%
70
57%
89
66%
145
60%
14
93%
111
74%
48
45%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
76
30%
74
34%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
13
20%
15
26%
45
35%
_
_
3
33%
38
31%
38
28%
75
31%
1
7%
32
21%
44
42%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
20
8%
20
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
4%
16
13%
_
_
1
11%
13
11%
7
5%
20
8%
0
0%
7
5%
13
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
2
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 280
All Students
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 237
LEVEL 1
121
51%
LEVEL 2
97
41%
LEVEL 3
15
6%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 193
LEVEL 1
82
42%
LEVEL 2
92
48%
LEVEL 3
15
8%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
39
89%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
37
65%
LEVEL 2
19
33%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
28
56%
LEVEL 2
18
36%
LEVEL 3
3
6%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
White
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
51
42%
LEVEL 2
57
47%
LEVEL 3
11
9%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
58
50%
LEVEL 2
51
44%
LEVEL 3
6
5%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Male
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
63
52%
LEVEL 2
46
38%
LEVEL 3
9
7%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 231
LEVEL 1
116
50%
LEVEL 2
96
42%
LEVEL 3
15
6%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
5
83%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
93
57%
LEVEL 2
62
38%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
28
37%
LEVEL 2
35
47%
LEVEL 3
9
12%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 236
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
237
193
44
6
57
50
121
3
9
116
121
231
6
162
75
1
236
PROFICIENT
8%
10%
0%
_%
2%
8%
11%
_%
11%
6%
10%
8%
0%
4%
16%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
121
51%
82
42%
39
89%
_
_
37
65%
28
56%
51
42%
_
_
5
56%
58
50%
63
52%
116
50%
5
83%
93
57%
28
37%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
97
41%
92
48%
5
11%
_
_
19
33%
18
36%
57
47%
_
_
3
33%
51
44%
46
38%
96
42%
1
17%
62
38%
35
47%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
15
6%
15
8%
0
0%
_
_
1
2%
3
6%
11
9%
_
_
0
0%
6
5%
9
7%
15
6%
0
0%
6
4%
9
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
4
2%
4
2%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
2
2%
_
_
1
11%
1
1%
3
2%
4
2%
0
0%
1
1%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 75
All Students
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
7
3%
LEVEL 2
50
21%
LEVEL 3
97
41%
LEVEL 4
85
36%
General Education
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 203
LEVEL 1
4
2%
LEVEL 2
32
16%
LEVEL 3
84
41%
LEVEL 4
83
41%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
18
50%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
5
100%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
14
30%
LEVEL 3
16
35%
LEVEL 4
13
28%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
14
25%
LEVEL 3
25
45%
LEVEL 4
13
24%
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
21
17%
LEVEL 3
52
41%
LEVEL 4
54
43%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
19
17%
LEVEL 3
46
41%
LEVEL 4
45
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
31
24%
LEVEL 3
51
40%
LEVEL 4
40
31%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 217
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
40
18%
LEVEL 3
91
42%
LEVEL 4
80
37%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
10
45%
LEVEL 3
6
27%
LEVEL 4
5
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 168
LEVEL 1
5
3%
LEVEL 2
44
26%
LEVEL 3
76
45%
LEVEL 4
43
26%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
21
30%
LEVEL 4
42
59%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 237
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
239
203
36
5
46
55
127
6
112
127
217
22
168
71
2
237
PROFICIENT
76%
82%
42%
100%
63%
69%
83%
67%
81%
72%
79%
50%
71%
89%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
7
3%
4
2%
3
8%
0
0%
3
7%
3
5%
0
0%
1
17%
2
2%
5
4%
6
3%
1
5%
5
3%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
50
21%
32
16%
18
50%
0
0%
14
30%
14
25%
21
17%
1
17%
19
17%
31
24%
40
18%
10
45%
44
26%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
97
41%
84
41%
13
36%
0
0%
16
35%
25
45%
52
41%
4
67%
46
41%
51
40%
91
42%
6
27%
76
45%
21
30%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
85
36%
83
41%
2
6%
5
100%
13
28%
13
24%
54
43%
0
0%
45
40%
40
31%
80
37%
5
23%
43
26%
42
59%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 64
All Students
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
17
10%
LEVEL 2
68
41%
LEVEL 3
67
41%
LEVEL 4
13
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
50
41%
LEVEL 3
55
45%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
13
30%
LEVEL 2
18
41%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
24
55%
LEVEL 3
13
30%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
20
51%
LEVEL 3
12
31%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
White
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
24
31%
LEVEL 3
39
51%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
34
42%
LEVEL 3
35
43%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
10
12%
LEVEL 2
34
40%
LEVEL 3
32
38%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
15
9%
LEVEL 2
64
40%
LEVEL 3
67
42%
LEVEL 4
13
8%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
14
11%
LEVEL 2
56
45%
LEVEL 3
46
37%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
12
30%
LEVEL 3
21
53%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
17
10%
LEVEL 2
68
41%
LEVEL 3
67
41%
LEVEL 4
13
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
165
121
44
2
44
39
77
3
5
81
84
159
6
125
40
165
PROFICIENT
48%
55%
30%
_%
34%
38%
61%
_%
60%
49%
48%
50%
0%
44%
63%
48%
LEVEL 1
17
10%
4
3%
13
30%
_
_
5
11%
4
10%
6
8%
_
_
2
40%
7
9%
10
12%
15
9%
2
33%
14
11%
3
8%
17
10%
LEVEL 2
68
41%
50
41%
18
41%
_
_
24
55%
20
51%
24
31%
_
_
0
0%
34
42%
34
40%
64
40%
4
67%
56
45%
12
30%
68
41%
LEVEL 3
67
41%
55
45%
12
27%
_
_
13
30%
12
31%
39
51%
_
_
3
60%
35
43%
32
38%
67
42%
0
0%
46
37%
21
53%
67
41%
LEVEL 4
13
8%
12
10%
1
2%
_
_
2
5%
3
8%
8
10%
_
_
0
0%
5
6%
8
10%
13
8%
0
0%
9
7%
4
10%
13
8%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
47
71%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
66
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
47
71%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2012 - 13)
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
1
1
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
1
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2012 - 13)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 3
1
Grade 4
1
Grade 5
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 3
1
Grade 4
1
Grade 5
1
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 260
LEVEL 1
16
6%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
111
43%
LEVEL 4
80
31%
General Education
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 210
LEVEL 1
4
2%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
LEVEL 3
101
48%
LEVEL 4
80
38%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
12
24%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
10
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
5
56%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
26
43%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
37
59%
LEVEL 4
10
16%
White
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
46
36%
LEVEL 4
52
41%
Female
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
47
38%
LEVEL 4
55
44%
Male
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
64
47%
LEVEL 4
25
18%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
15
6%
LEVEL 2
11
4%
LEVEL 3
110
43%
LEVEL 4
80
32%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
10
8%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
58
49%
LEVEL 4
23
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
53
38%
LEVEL 4
57
40%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 259
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
260
210
50
9
60
63
128
124
136
253
7
119
141
1
259
PROFICIENT
73%
86%
20%
78%
65%
75%
77%
82%
65%
75%
14%
68%
78%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
16
6%
4
2%
12
24%
0
0%
5
8%
4
6%
7
5%
5
4%
11
8%
15
6%
1
14%
10
8%
6
4%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
12
5%
8
4%
4
8%
1
11%
4
7%
3
5%
4
3%
6
5%
6
4%
11
4%
1
14%
7
6%
5
4%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
111
43%
101
48%
10
20%
2
22%
26
43%
37
59%
46
36%
47
38%
64
47%
110
43%
1
14%
58
49%
53
38%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
80
31%
80
38%
0
0%
5
56%
13
22%
10
16%
52
41%
55
44%
25
18%
80
32%
0
0%
23
19%
57
40%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 260
LEVEL 1
17
7%
LEVEL 2
7
3%
LEVEL 3
183
70%
LEVEL 4
29
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 210
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
169
80%
LEVEL 4
29
14%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
14
28%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
14
28%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
4
44%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
46
77%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
50
79%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
84
66%
LEVEL 4
22
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
95
77%
LEVEL 4
16
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
13
10%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
88
65%
LEVEL 4
13
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
14
6%
LEVEL 2
7
3%
LEVEL 3
181
72%
LEVEL 4
28
11%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
13
11%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
86
72%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
97
69%
LEVEL 4
23
16%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 259
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
260
210
50
9
60
63
128
124
136
253
7
119
141
1
259
PROFICIENT
82%
94%
28%
78%
77%
84%
83%
90%
74%
83%
43%
77%
85%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
17
7%
3
1%
14
28%
2
22%
4
7%
4
6%
7
5%
4
3%
13
10%
14
6%
3
43%
13
11%
4
3%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
7
3%
4
2%
3
6%
0
0%
1
2%
2
3%
4
3%
4
3%
3
2%
7
3%
0
0%
4
3%
3
2%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
183
70%
169
80%
14
28%
3
33%
46
77%
50
79%
84
66%
95
77%
88
65%
181
72%
2
29%
86
72%
97
69%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
29
11%
29
14%
0
0%
4
44%
0
0%
3
5%
22
17%
16
13%
13
10%
28
11%
1
14%
6
5%
23
16%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 260
LEVEL 1
22
8%
LEVEL 2
19
7%
LEVEL 3
137
53%
LEVEL 4
48
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 210
LEVEL 1
8
4%
LEVEL 2
11
5%
LEVEL 3
129
61%
LEVEL 4
47
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
14
28%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
5
56%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
7
12%
LEVEL 3
34
57%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
35
56%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
White
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
67
52%
LEVEL 4
34
27%
Female
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
12
10%
LEVEL 3
72
58%
LEVEL 4
26
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
16
12%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
65
48%
LEVEL 4
22
16%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
20
8%
LEVEL 2
19
8%
LEVEL 3
137
54%
LEVEL 4
47
19%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
13
11%
LEVEL 2
15
13%
LEVEL 3
64
54%
LEVEL 4
13
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
9
6%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
73
52%
LEVEL 4
35
25%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 259
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
260
210
50
9
60
63
128
124
136
253
7
119
141
1
259
PROFICIENT
71%
84%
18%
67%
63%
63%
79%
79%
64%
73%
14%
65%
77%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
22
8%
8
4%
14
28%
0
0%
5
8%
8
13%
9
7%
6
5%
16
12%
20
8%
2
29%
13
11%
9
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
19
7%
11
5%
8
16%
1
11%
7
12%
6
10%
5
4%
12
10%
7
5%
19
8%
0
0%
15
13%
4
3%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
137
53%
129
61%
8
16%
1
11%
34
57%
35
56%
67
52%
72
58%
65
48%
137
54%
0
0%
64
54%
73
52%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
48
18%
47
22%
1
2%
5
56%
4
7%
5
8%
34
27%
26
21%
22
16%
47
19%
1
14%
13
11%
35
25%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 260
LEVEL 1
16
6%
LEVEL 2
11
4%
LEVEL 3
101
39%
LEVEL 4
92
35%
General Education
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 210
LEVEL 1
4
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
90
43%
LEVEL 4
91
43%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
12
24%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
5
56%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
25
42%
LEVEL 4
17
28%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
28
44%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
White
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
46
36%
LEVEL 4
54
42%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
53
43%
LEVEL 4
48
39%
Male
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
48
35%
LEVEL 4
44
32%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
13
5%
LEVEL 2
11
4%
LEVEL 3
99
39%
LEVEL 4
92
36%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
13
11%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
46
39%
LEVEL 4
35
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
55
39%
LEVEL 4
57
40%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 259
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
260
210
50
9
60
63
128
124
136
253
7
119
141
1
259
PROFICIENT
74%
86%
24%
78%
70%
70%
78%
81%
68%
75%
29%
68%
79%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
16
6%
4
2%
12
24%
2
22%
5
8%
4
6%
5
4%
5
4%
11
8%
13
5%
3
43%
13
11%
3
2%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
11
4%
9
4%
2
4%
0
0%
2
3%
4
6%
5
4%
6
5%
5
4%
11
4%
0
0%
6
5%
5
4%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
101
39%
90
43%
11
22%
2
22%
25
42%
28
44%
46
36%
53
43%
48
35%
99
39%
2
29%
46
39%
55
39%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
92
35%
91
43%
1
2%
5
56%
17
28%
16
25%
54
42%
48
39%
44
32%
92
36%
0
0%
35
29%
57
40%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 260
LEVEL 1
11
4%
LEVEL 2
19
7%
LEVEL 3
121
47%
LEVEL 4
75
29%
General Education
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 210
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
11
5%
LEVEL 3
110
52%
LEVEL 4
74
35%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
5
56%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
32
53%
LEVEL 4
9
15%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
9
14%
LEVEL 3
30
48%
LEVEL 4
12
19%
White
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
58
45%
LEVEL 4
49
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
10
8%
LEVEL 3
60
48%
LEVEL 4
43
35%
Male
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
61
45%
LEVEL 4
32
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
18
7%
LEVEL 3
120
47%
LEVEL 4
75
30%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
9
8%
LEVEL 2
10
8%
LEVEL 3
61
51%
LEVEL 4
23
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
60
43%
LEVEL 4
52
37%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 259
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
260
210
50
9
60
63
128
124
136
253
7
119
141
1
259
PROFICIENT
75%
88%
24%
67%
68%
67%
84%
83%
68%
77%
14%
71%
79%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
11
4%
3
1%
8
16%
1
11%
4
7%
2
3%
4
3%
2
2%
9
7%
8
3%
3
43%
9
8%
2
1%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
19
7%
11
5%
8
16%
2
22%
5
8%
9
14%
3
2%
10
8%
9
7%
18
7%
1
14%
10
8%
9
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
121
47%
110
52%
11
22%
1
11%
32
53%
30
48%
58
45%
60
48%
61
45%
120
47%
1
14%
61
51%
60
43%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
75
29%
74
35%
1
2%
5
56%
9
15%
12
19%
49
38%
43
35%
32
24%
75
30%
0
0%
23
19%
52
37%
_
_
_
_
Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
272
222
50
0
6
69
70
126
1
7
140
132
267
5
141
131
2
270
55
240
88%
209
94%
31
62%
0
0%
_
_
56
81%
62
89%
115
91%
_
_
7
100%
127
91%
113
86%
237
89%
3
60%
125
89%
115
88%
_
_
_
_
65
191
70%
172
77%
19
38%
0
0%
_
_
40
58%
48
69%
97
77%
_
_
6
86%
104
74%
87
66%
190
71%
1
20%
92
65%
99
76%
_
_
_
_
85
45
17%
45
20%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
4
6%
5
7%
32
25%
_
_
4
57%
28
20%
17
13%
45
17%
0
0%
16
11%
29
22%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 272
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
240
88%
65
191
70%
85
45
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 222
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
209
94%
65
172
77%
85
45
20%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
62%
65
19
38%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
81%
65
40
58%
85
4
6%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
89%
65
48
69%
85
5
7%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
91%
65
97
77%
85
32
25%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
4
57%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 140
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
127
91%
65
104
74%
85
28
20%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
86%
65
87
66%
85
17
13%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 267
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
237
89%
65
190
71%
85
45
17%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 141
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
89%
65
92
65%
85
16
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 131
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
88%
65
99
76%
85
29
22%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 270
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
285
236
49
0
8
81
62
133
1
9
132
153
276
9
167
118
1
284
55
255
89%
225
95%
30
61%
0
0%
_
_
69
85%
56
90%
123
92%
_
_
7
78%
122
92%
133
87%
249
90%
6
67%
147
88%
108
92%
_
_
_
_
65
208
73%
195
83%
13
27%
0
0%
_
_
52
64%
43
69%
107
80%
_
_
6
67%
98
74%
110
72%
205
74%
3
33%
118
71%
90
76%
_
_
_
_
85
17
6%
17
7%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
2
2%
5
8%
9
7%
_
_
1
11%
4
3%
13
8%
17
6%
0
0%
5
3%
12
10%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 285
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
255
89%
65
208
73%
85
17
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 236
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
225
95%
65
195
83%
85
17
7%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
61%
65
13
27%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
85%
65
52
64%
85
2
2%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
90%
65
43
69%
85
5
8%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 133
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
123
92%
65
107
80%
85
9
7%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
92%
65
98
74%
85
4
3%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
133
87%
65
110
72%
85
13
8%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 276
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
249
90%
65
205
74%
85
17
6%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
3
33%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 167
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
147
88%
65
118
71%
85
5
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
108
92%
65
90
76%
85
12
10%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 284
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
168
159
9
0
1
39
28
99
1
30
84
84
166
2
77
91
2
166
55
133
79%
126
79%
7
78%
0
0%
_
_
28
72%
_
_
83
84%
_
_
22
73%
66
79%
67
80%
_
_
_
_
55
71%
78
86%
_
_
_
_
65
102
61%
97
61%
5
56%
0
0%
_
_
20
51%
_
_
70
71%
_
_
12
40%
49
58%
53
63%
_
_
_
_
40
52%
62
68%
_
_
_
_
85
36
21%
36
23%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
3
8%
_
_
30
30%
_
_
3
10%
16
19%
20
24%
_
_
_
_
9
12%
27
30%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 168
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
133
79%
65
102
61%
85
36
21%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 159
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
126
79%
65
97
61%
85
36
23%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
5
56%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
72%
65
20
51%
85
3
8%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 99
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
84%
65
70
71%
85
30
30%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
73%
65
12
40%
85
3
10%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
79%
65
49
58%
85
16
19%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
80%
65
53
63%
85
20
24%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
71%
65
40
52%
85
9
12%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
78
86%
65
62
68%
85
27
30%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
83
82
1
0
4
17
12
50
0
16
56
27
82
1
33
50
0
83
55
48
58%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
6
35%
_
_
31
62%
0
0%
11
69%
30
54%
18
67%
_
_
_
_
16
48%
32
64%
0
0%
48
58%
65
42
51%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
4
24%
_
_
30
60%
0
0%
8
50%
24
43%
18
67%
_
_
_
_
11
33%
31
62%
0
0%
42
51%
85
18
22%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
14
28%
0
0%
4
25%
14
25%
4
15%
_
_
_
_
5
15%
13
26%
0
0%
18
22%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
58%
65
42
51%
85
18
22%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
35%
65
4
24%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
62%
65
30
60%
85
14
28%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
69%
65
8
50%
85
4
25%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
54%
65
24
43%
85
14
25%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
67%
65
18
67%
85
4
15%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
48%
65
11
33%
85
5
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
64%
65
31
62%
85
13
26%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
58%
65
42
51%
85
18
22%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
301
231
70
0
2
82
65
150
2
69
146
155
296
5
153
148
2
299
55
202
67%
179
77%
23
33%
0
0%
_
_
50
61%
_
_
106
71%
_
_
46
67%
95
65%
107
69%
201
68%
1
20%
93
61%
109
74%
_
_
_
_
65
143
48%
134
58%
9
13%
0
0%
_
_
33
40%
_
_
80
53%
_
_
30
43%
62
42%
81
52%
142
48%
1
20%
57
37%
86
58%
_
_
_
_
85
28
9%
27
12%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
4
5%
_
_
18
12%
_
_
6
9%
13
9%
15
10%
27
9%
1
20%
11
7%
17
11%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 301
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
202
67%
65
143
48%
85
28
9%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 231
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
179
77%
65
134
58%
85
27
12%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
33%
65
9
13%
85
1
1%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
61%
65
33
40%
85
4
5%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
71%
65
80
53%
85
18
12%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
67%
65
30
43%
85
6
9%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
95
65%
65
62
42%
85
13
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
69%
65
81
52%
85
15
10%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 296
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
201
68%
65
142
48%
85
27
9%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
1
20%
65
1
20%
85
1
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
93
61%
65
57
37%
85
11
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 148
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
74%
65
86
58%
85
17
11%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 299
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
244
201
43
0
7
61
55
120
1
8
130
114
238
6
125
119
2
242
55
208
85%
186
93%
22
51%
0
0%
_
_
43
70%
46
84%
112
93%
_
_
7
88%
112
86%
96
84%
205
86%
3
50%
98
78%
110
92%
_
_
_
_
65
170
70%
157
78%
13
30%
0
0%
_
_
32
52%
38
69%
93
78%
_
_
7
88%
89
68%
81
71%
169
71%
1
17%
75
60%
95
80%
_
_
_
_
85
75
31%
71
35%
4
9%
0
0%
_
_
11
18%
13
24%
45
38%
_
_
6
75%
37
28%
38
33%
75
32%
0
0%
28
22%
47
39%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 244
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
208
85%
65
170
70%
85
75
31%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 201
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
186
93%
65
157
78%
85
71
35%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
51%
65
13
30%
85
4
9%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
70%
65
32
52%
85
11
18%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
84%
65
38
69%
85
13
24%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 120
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
112
93%
65
93
78%
85
45
38%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
7
88%
85
6
75%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
112
86%
65
89
68%
85
37
28%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
96
84%
65
81
71%
85
38
33%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 238
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
205
86%
65
169
71%
85
75
32%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
98
78%
65
75
60%
85
28
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
110
92%
65
95
80%
85
47
39%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 242
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
352
303
49
0
6
86
74
185
1
7
172
180
346
6
192
160
1
351
55
323
92%
291
96%
32
65%
0
0%
_
_
78
91%
62
84%
177
96%
_
_
6
86%
158
92%
165
92%
322
93%
1
17%
168
88%
155
97%
_
_
_
_
65
278
79%
260
86%
18
37%
0
0%
_
_
56
65%
53
72%
164
89%
_
_
5
71%
134
78%
144
80%
277
80%
1
17%
138
72%
140
88%
_
_
_
_
85
121
34%
121
40%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
11
13%
19
26%
88
48%
_
_
3
43%
56
33%
65
36%
121
35%
0
0%
47
24%
74
46%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 352
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
323
92%
65
278
79%
85
121
34%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 303
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
291
96%
65
260
86%
85
121
40%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
65%
65
18
37%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
78
91%
65
56
65%
85
11
13%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
84%
65
53
72%
85
19
26%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 185
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
177
96%
65
164
89%
85
88
48%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
5
71%
85
3
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
158
92%
65
134
78%
85
56
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 180
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
165
92%
65
144
80%
85
65
36%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 346
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
322
93%
65
277
80%
85
121
35%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
1
17%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 192
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
168
88%
65
138
72%
85
47
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 160
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
155
97%
65
140
88%
85
74
46%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 351
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
166
129
37
0
2
43
47
73
1
46
74
92
160
6
95
71
3
163
55
113
68%
99
77%
14
38%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
30
64%
55
75%
_
_
28
61%
53
72%
60
65%
111
69%
2
33%
59
62%
54
76%
_
_
_
_
65
72
43%
63
49%
9
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
36%
38
52%
_
_
17
37%
26
35%
46
50%
72
45%
0
0%
36
38%
36
51%
_
_
_
_
85
17
10%
13
10%
4
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
11%
11
15%
_
_
1
2%
5
7%
12
13%
17
11%
0
0%
7
7%
10
14%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
68%
65
72
43%
85
17
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 129
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
99
77%
65
63
49%
85
13
10%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
38%
65
9
24%
85
4
11%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
64%
65
17
36%
85
5
11%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 73
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
75%
65
38
52%
85
11
15%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
61%
65
17
37%
85
1
2%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
72%
65
26
35%
85
5
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
65%
65
46
50%
85
12
13%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 160
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
111
69%
65
72
45%
85
17
11%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
62%
65
36
38%
85
7
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
76%
65
36
51%
85
10
14%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 163
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
84
2
0
2
17
16
51
0
18
51
35
86
0
36
50
1
85
55
81
94%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
15
88%
_
_
48
94%
0
0%
18
100%
48
94%
33
94%
81
94%
0
0%
33
92%
48
96%
_
_
_
_
65
59
69%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
7
41%
_
_
39
76%
0
0%
13
72%
35
69%
24
69%
59
69%
0
0%
19
53%
40
80%
_
_
_
_
85
11
13%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
9
18%
0
0%
2
11%
11
22%
0
0%
11
13%
0
0%
3
8%
8
16%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
81
94%
65
59
69%
85
11
13%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
88%
65
7
41%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
94%
65
39
76%
85
9
18%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
13
72%
85
2
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
94%
65
35
69%
85
11
22%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
24
69%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
81
94%
65
59
69%
85
11
13%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
92%
65
19
53%
85
3
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
96%
65
40
80%
85
8
16%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
53
53
0
0
5
11
5
32
0
26
27
53
0
16
37
0
53
55
47
89%
47
89%
0
0%
0
0%
5
100%
8
73%
5
100%
29
91%
0
0%
22
85%
25
93%
47
89%
0
0%
15
94%
32
86%
0
0%
47
89%
65
44
83%
44
83%
0
0%
0
0%
5
100%
8
73%
5
100%
26
81%
0
0%
21
81%
23
85%
44
83%
0
0%
14
88%
30
81%
0
0%
44
83%
85
14
26%
14
26%
0
0%
0
0%
2
40%
1
9%
3
60%
8
25%
0
0%
7
27%
7
26%
14
26%
0
0%
4
25%
10
27%
0
0%
14
26%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
89%
65
44
83%
85
14
26%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
89%
65
44
83%
85
14
26%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
2
40%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
73%
65
8
73%
85
1
9%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
91%
65
26
81%
85
8
25%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
85%
65
21
81%
85
7
27%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
93%
65
23
85%
85
7
26%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
89%
65
44
83%
85
14
26%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
94%
65
14
88%
85
4
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
86%
65
30
81%
85
10
27%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
89%
65
44
83%
85
14
26%
Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
Reading
10
50%
Writing
9
89%
Math
7
29%
Global Studies
9
44%
US Hist & Gov't
9
0%
Science
6
17%
1
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
_
1
_
0
0%
9
_
9
89%
7
29%
8
_
8
_
6
17%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
_
2
_
2
_
2
_
2
_
3
_
4
_
4
_
2
_
3
_
4
_
3
_
3
_
3
_
3
_
4
_
3
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
10
50%
9
89%
7
29%
9
44%
9
0%
6
17%
2
_
2
_
2
_
5
_
3
_
3
_
8
_
7
_
5
_
4
_
6
_
3
_
8
_
7
_
5
_
8
_
7
_
4
_
2
_
2
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
2
_
7
_
7
_
5
_
5
_
7
_
5
_
3
_
2
_
2
_
4
_
2
_
1
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
10
50%
9
89%
7
29%
9
44%
9
0%
6
17%
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
50%
Writing
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
89%
Math
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
29%
Global Studies
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
44%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
17%
General Education
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
89%
Math
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
29%
Global Studies
Number Tested
8
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
8
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
17%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Black or African American
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Hispanic or Latino
Reading
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
White
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Multiracial
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Small Group Total
Reading
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
50%
Writing
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
89%
Math
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
29%
Global Studies
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
44%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
17%
Female
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Male
Reading
Number Tested
8
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
8
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
8
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Not Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
50%
Writing
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
89%
Math
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
29%
Global Studies
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
44%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
17%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
3
3
9
9
7
7
7
10
10
10
10
PROFICIENT
80%
100%
80%
80%
100%
_%
_%
_%
_%
78%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0
0
0
0
_
_
_
_
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 2
1
0
1
1
0
_
_
_
_
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 3
0
1
1
1
2
_
_
_
_
0
6
2
2
1
0
1
1
2
LEVEL 4
4
4
3
3
3
_
_
_
_
7
3
5
5
6
10
9
9
8
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
4 80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
4
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
1
LEVEL 4
4
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
4 80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
1
LEVEL 4
3
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
4 80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
1
LEVEL 4
3
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
2
LEVEL 4
3
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
7 78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
7
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
9 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
6
LEVEL 4
3
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
7 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
2
LEVEL 4
5
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
7 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
2
LEVEL 4
5
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
7 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
1
LEVEL 4
6
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
10 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
10
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
10 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
1
LEVEL 4
9
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
10 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
1
LEVEL 4
9
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
10 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
2
LEVEL 4
8
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2012 - 13)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
11
11
BEGINNING
18%
18%
INTERMEDIATE
36%
36%
ADVANCED
45%
45%
PROFICIENT
0%
0%
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
17
13
4
BEGINNING
0%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
41%
_
_
ADVANCED
35%
_
_
PROFICIENT
24%
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
12
10
2
BEGINNING
0%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
17%
_
_
ADVANCED
67%
_
_
PROFICIENT
17%
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
13
12
1
BEGINNING
8%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
23%
_
_
ADVANCED
46%
_
_
PROFICIENT
23%
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
23
14
9
BEGINNING
9%
7%
11%
INTERMEDIATE
30%
14%
56%
ADVANCED
39%
43%
33%
PROFICIENT
22%
36%
0%
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
11
7
4
BEGINNING
18%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
27%
_
_
ADVANCED
27%
_
_
PROFICIENT
27%
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
4
2
2
BEGINNING
_
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
15
8
7
BEGINNING
0%
0%
0%
INTERMEDIATE
27%
25%
29%
ADVANCED
60%
50%
71%
PROFICIENT
13%
25%
0%
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
6
2
4
BEGINNING
17%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
17%
_
_
ADVANCED
50%
_
_
PROFICIENT
17%
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
4
3
1
BEGINNING
_
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
7
3
4
BEGINNING
14%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
29%
_
_
ADVANCED
29%
_
_
PROFICIENT
29%
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
2
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
BEGINNING
18%
INTERMEDIATE
36%
ADVANCED
45%
PROFICIENT
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 11
BEGINNING
18%
INTERMEDIATE
36%
ADVANCED
45%
PROFICIENT
0%
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 17
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
41%
ADVANCED
35%
PROFICIENT
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 13
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
17%
ADVANCED
67%
PROFICIENT
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 10
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 13
BEGINNING
8%
INTERMEDIATE
23%
ADVANCED
46%
PROFICIENT
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 23
BEGINNING
9%
INTERMEDIATE
30%
ADVANCED
39%
PROFICIENT
22%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 14
BEGINNING
7%
INTERMEDIATE
14%
ADVANCED
43%
PROFICIENT
36%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
BEGINNING
11%
INTERMEDIATE
56%
ADVANCED
33%
PROFICIENT
0%
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
BEGINNING
18%
INTERMEDIATE
27%
ADVANCED
27%
PROFICIENT
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 15
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
27%
ADVANCED
60%
PROFICIENT
13%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
25%
ADVANCED
50%
PROFICIENT
25%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
29%
ADVANCED
71%
PROFICIENT
0%
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
BEGINNING
17%
INTERMEDIATE
17%
ADVANCED
50%
PROFICIENT
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
14%
INTERMEDIATE
29%
ADVANCED
29%
PROFICIENT
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
YES
―
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
YES
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,421
2
339
331
26
690
33
244
72
947
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
100%
99%
―
99%
―
98%
100%
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
YES
―
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,362
2
327
308
24
671
30
238✝
86‡
905
PI
70
―
50
61
―
81
60
29✝
35‡
55
EAMO
79
―
53
59
―
101
66
28
28
62
Safe Harbor Target
78
―
53
59
―
91
20
28
28
62
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,421
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,362
PI
70
EAMO
79
Safe Harbor Target
78
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
339
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
327
PI
50
EAMO
53
Safe Harbor Target
53
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
331
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
308
PI
61
EAMO
59
Safe Harbor Target
59
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
24
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
690
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
671
PI
81
EAMO
101
Safe Harbor Target
91
Multiracial
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
33
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
30
PI
60
EAMO
66
Safe Harbor Target
20
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
238✝
PI
29✝
EAMO
28
Safe Harbor Target
28
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
72
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
86‡
PI
35‡
EAMO
28
Safe Harbor Target
28
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
947
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
905
PI
55
EAMO
62
Safe Harbor Target
62
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,419
1,082
1,090
1,395
731
1,388
1,177
1,349
474
746
675
14
1,407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,360
1,035
1,054
1,338
691
1,332
1,129
1,299
457
714
648
11
1,351
PI
70
76
72
69
58
70
78
72
99
61
79
―
70
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,419
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,360
PI
70
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,082
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,035
PI
76
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,090
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,054
PI
72
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,395
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,338
PI
69
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
731
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
691
PI
58
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,388
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,332
PI
70
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,177
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,129
PI
78
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,349
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,299
PI
72
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
474
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
457
PI
99
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
746
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
714
PI
61
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
675
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
648
PI
79
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,351
PI
70
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ‡ Includes former english language learner students because the number of english language learner students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
YES
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,419
2
339
331
26
689
32
243
72
946
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
98%
97%
―
98%
―
98%
99%
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,347
2
322
303
25
666
29
236✝
85‡
894
PI
57
―
36
46
―
71
―
29✝
27‡
44
EAMO
76
―
45
56
―
95
―
30
32
58
Safe Harbor Target
74
―
45
56
―
84
―
30
32
58
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,419
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,347
PI
57
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
74
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
339
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
322
PI
36
EAMO
45
Safe Harbor Target
45
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
331
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
303
PI
46
EAMO
56
Safe Harbor Target
56
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
689
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
666
PI
71
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
84
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
29
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
243
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
236✝
PI
29✝
EAMO
30
Safe Harbor Target
30
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
72
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
85‡
PI
27‡
EAMO
32
Safe Harbor Target
32
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
946
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
894
PI
44
EAMO
58
Safe Harbor Target
58
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,417
1,080
1,088
1,393
730
1,387
1,176
1,347
473
744
675
14
1,405
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
99%
98%
99%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,345
1,025
1,044
1,322
681
1,318
1,116
1,284
453
703
644
11
1,336
PI
57
64
61
57
44
58
64
60
84
57
57
―
58
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,417
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,345
PI
57
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,080
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,025
PI
64
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,088
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,044
PI
61
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,393
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,322
PI
57
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
730
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
681
PI
44
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,387
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,318
PI
58
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,176
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,116
PI
64
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,347
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,284
PI
60
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
473
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
453
PI
84
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
744
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
703
PI
57
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
675
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
644
PI
57
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,405
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,336
PI
58
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ‡ Includes former english language learner students because the number of english language learner students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 80%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
495
0
110
108
11
256
10
95
29
344
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
97%
97%
―
98%
―
97%
―
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
467
0
104
96
11
247
9
91✝
24
323
PI
167
―
150
156
―
178
―
131✝
―
159
EAMO
176
―
155
159
―
185
―
148
―
165
Progress Target
176
―
155
159
―
185
―
148
―
165
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
495
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
467
PI
167
EAMO
176
Progress Target
176
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
110
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
PI
150
EAMO
155
Progress Target
155
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
108
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
156
EAMO
159
Progress Target
159
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
256
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
247
PI
178
EAMO
185
Progress Target
185
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
95
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91✝
PI
131✝
EAMO
148
Progress Target
148
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
24
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
344
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
323
PI
159
EAMO
165
Progress Target
165
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
495
385
387
484
239
485
400
466
151
263
232
4
491
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
97%
98%
98%
98%
99%
97%
99%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
467
363
371
456
220
458
378
443
144
246
221
1
466
PI
167
171
169
167
154
167
175
168
183
163
171
―
167
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
495
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
467
PI
167
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
385
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
363
PI
171
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
387
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
371
PI
169
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
484
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
456
PI
167
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
239
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
220
PI
154
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
485
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
458
PI
167
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
400
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
378
PI
175
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
466
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
443
PI
168
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
151
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
PI
183
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
263
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
246
PI
163
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
232
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
221
PI
171
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
491
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
466
PI
167
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
YES
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
167
0
34
36
7
90
0
15
1
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
97%
―
―
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
YES
YES
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
0
47
51
7
108
0
27
4
98
PI
147
―
136
143
―
152
―
―
―
129
EAMO
155
―
126
130
―
166
―
―
―
136
Safe Harbor Target
155
―
126
130
―
166
―
―
―
136
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
PI
147
EAMO
155
Safe Harbor Target
155
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
136
EAMO
126
Safe Harbor Target
126
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
51
PI
143
EAMO
130
Safe Harbor Target
130
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
108
PI
152
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
166
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
129
EAMO
136
Safe Harbor Target
136
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
167
133
131
160
77
167
152
166
97
86
81
1
166
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
100%
98%
100%
98%
98%
97%
100%
―
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
166
162
206
105
213
186
209
115
105
108
1
212
PI
147
150
148
146
142
147
161
149
163
131
162
―
148
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
PI
147
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
166
PI
150
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
131
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
162
PI
148
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
160
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
206
PI
146
Not White
12th Graders
77
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
142
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
PI
147
General Education
12th Graders
152
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
186
PI
161
English Proficient
12th Graders
166
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
209
PI
149
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
163
Male
12th Graders
86
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
131
Female
12th Graders
81
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
108
PI
162
Migrant
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
166
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
212
PI
148
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
YES
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
167
0
34
36
7
90
0
15
1
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
YES
YES
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
0
47
51
7
108
0
27
4
98
PI
122
―
106
110
―
131
―
―
―
109
EAMO
134
―
98
104
―
148
―
―
―
113
Safe Harbor Target
127
―
98
104
―
133
―
―
―
113
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
PI
122
EAMO
134
Safe Harbor Target
127
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
106
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
98
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
51
PI
110
EAMO
104
Safe Harbor Target
104
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
108
PI
131
EAMO
148
Safe Harbor Target
133
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
109
EAMO
113
Safe Harbor Target
113
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
167
133
131
160
77
167
152
166
97
86
81
1
166
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
98%
99%
100%
99%
100%
99%
98%
98%
100%
―
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
166
162
206
105
213
186
209
115
105
108
1
212
PI
122
127
126
120
112
122
131
123
133
113
131
―
122
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
PI
122
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
166
PI
127
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
131
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
162
PI
126
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
160
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
206
PI
120
Not White
12th Graders
77
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
112
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
213
PI
122
General Education
12th Graders
152
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
186
PI
131
English Proficient
12th Graders
166
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
209
PI
123
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
133
Male
12th Graders
86
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
113
Female
12th Graders
81
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
108
PI
131
Migrant
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
166
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
212
PI
122
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
70
―
50
61
―
81
60
29
35
55
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
57
―
36
46
―
71
―
29
27
44
Secondary-Level ELA PI
147
―
136
143
―
152
―
―
―
129
Secondary-Level MATH PI
122
―
106
110
―
131
―
―
―
109
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
99
0
82
90
0
109
60
29
31
84
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
70
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
57
Secondary-Level ELA PI
147
Secondary-Level MATH PI
122
Unweighted Combined PI
99
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
50
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
36
Secondary-Level ELA PI
136
Secondary-Level MATH PI
106
Unweighted Combined PI
82
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
61
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
46
Secondary-Level ELA PI
143
Secondary-Level MATH PI
110
Unweighted Combined PI
90
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
81
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
71
Secondary-Level ELA PI
152
Secondary-Level MATH PI
131
Unweighted Combined PI
109
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
60
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
60
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
29
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
29
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
29
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
35
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
27
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
31
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
55
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
44
Secondary-Level ELA PI
129
Secondary-Level MATH PI
109
Unweighted Combined PI
84
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
YES
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
YES
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
YES
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
NO
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
271
0
58
55
4
154
0
53✝
2
127
Graduation Rate
76%
―
71%
67%
―
81%
―
53%✝
―
76%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
76%
―
66%
79%
―
79%
―
58%
―
77%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
271
Graduation Rate
76%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
76%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58
Graduation Rate
71%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
66%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
55
Graduation Rate
67%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
154
Graduation Rate
81%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53✝
Graduation Rate
53%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
58%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
127
Graduation Rate
76%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
77%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
1
61
61
5
157
0
55✝
1
128
Graduation Rate
79%
―
69%
82%
―
82%
―
53%✝
―
74%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
73%
―
63%
72%
―
77%
―
52%
―
72%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
Graduation Rate
79%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
73%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
61
Graduation Rate
69%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
63%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
61
Graduation Rate
82%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
72%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
82%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
77%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
55✝
Graduation Rate
53%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
52%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
128
Graduation Rate
74%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
72%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
271
213
216
267
117
271
218
269
144
138
133
1
270
Graduation Rate
76%
78%
79%
76%
70%
76%
82%
77%
77%
70%
83%
―
77%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
284
224
224
280
128
285
230
284
157
143
142
0
285
Graduation Rate
79%
82%
78%
79%
75%
79%
85%
79%
83%
80%
77%
―
79%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
271
Graduation Rate
76%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
213
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
216
Graduation Rate
79%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
267
Graduation Rate
76%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
117
Graduation Rate
70%
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
271
Graduation Rate
76%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
218
Graduation Rate
82%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
269
Graduation Rate
77%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
Graduation Rate
77%
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
70%
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
83%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
270
Graduation Rate
77%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
284
Graduation Rate
79%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
224
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
224
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
79%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
128
Graduation Rate
75%
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
Graduation Rate
79%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
230
Graduation Rate
85%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
284
Graduation Rate
79%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
83%
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
Graduation Rate
80%
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
77%
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
Graduation Rate
79%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
15%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
15%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
2%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
