ARKPORT CENTRAL SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2013 - 14]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
17%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
2%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2012-13 to 2013-14)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
17%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
2%
Staff Counts (2013 - 14)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
2
0
4
0
Staff Counts (2013 - 14)
Principals
2
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
4
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2013 - 14)
TOTAL TEACHERS
47
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
2%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
4%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
11%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
106
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
204
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2013 - 14)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 47
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
2%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
4%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
11%
Total Number of Core Classes
106
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
204
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
42
34
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
42
34
8
REGENTS DIPLOMA
37
88%
33
97%
4
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
14
33%
14
41%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
7%
1
3%
2
25%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
12%
1
3%
4
50%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
42
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
42
Regents Diploma
37
88%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
14
33%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
12%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
34
Regents Diploma
33
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
14
41%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
8
Regents Diploma
4
50%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
25%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
50%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
42
34
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
42
34
8
REGENTS DIPLOMA
37
88%
33
97%
4
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
14
33%
14
41%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
7%
1
3%
2
25%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
12%
1
3%
4
50%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
42
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
42
Regents Diploma
37
88%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
14
33%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
12%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
34
Regents Diploma
33
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
14
41%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
8
Regents Diploma
4
50%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
25%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
50%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
42
34
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
42
34
8
REGENTS DIPLOMA
37
88%
33
97%
4
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
14
33%
14
41%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
7%
1
3%
2
25%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
12%
1
3%
4
50%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
42
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
42
Regents Diploma
37
88%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
14
33%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
12%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
34
Regents Diploma
33
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
14
41%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
8
Regents Diploma
4
50%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
25%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
50%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
11
26%
11
32%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
19
45%
18
53%
1
13%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
7%
2
6%
1
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
8
19%
2
6%
6
75%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
11
26%
To Two-Year College
19
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
2%
To the Military
3
7%
To Employment
8
19%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
11
32%
To Two-Year College
18
53%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
2
6%
To Employment
2
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
13%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
13%
To Employment
6
75%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
11
26%
11
32%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
19
45%
18
53%
1
13%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
7%
2
6%
1
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
8
19%
2
6%
6
75%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
11
26%
To Two-Year College
19
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
2%
To the Military
3
7%
To Employment
8
19%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
11
32%
To Two-Year College
18
53%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
2
6%
To Employment
2
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
13%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
13%
To Employment
6
75%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
11
26%
11
32%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
19
45%
18
53%
1
13%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
7%
2
6%
1
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
8
19%
2
6%
6
75%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
11
26%
To Two-Year College
19
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
2%
To the Military
3
7%
To Employment
8
19%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
11
32%
To Two-Year College
18
53%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
2
6%
To Employment
2
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
13%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
13%
To Employment
6
75%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 314
All Students
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
11
32%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
11
32%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
11
58%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
6
40%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
11
32%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
5
19%
LEVEL 2
9
33%
LEVEL 3
12
44%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
11
32%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
32
2
33
1
34
19
15
34
7
27
34
PROFICIENT
53%
_%
_%
_%
_%
53%
58%
47%
53%
71%
48%
53%
LEVEL 1
5
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
15%
1
5%
4
27%
5
15%
0
0%
5
19%
5
15%
LEVEL 2
11
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
32%
7
37%
4
27%
11
32%
2
29%
9
33%
11
32%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
50%
11
58%
6
40%
17
50%
5
71%
12
44%
17
50%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
7%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
1
3%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
8
26%
LEVEL 2
8
26%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
8
26%
LEVEL 2
8
26%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
18%
LEVEL 3
9
53%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
7
50%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
8
26%
LEVEL 2
8
26%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
5
22%
LEVEL 2
6
26%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
8
26%
LEVEL 2
8
26%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
29
2
31
17
14
31
8
23
31
PROFICIENT
48%
_%
_%
48%
76%
14%
48%
38%
52%
48%
LEVEL 1
8
26%
_
_
_
_
8
26%
1
6%
7
50%
8
26%
3
38%
5
22%
8
26%
LEVEL 2
8
26%
_
_
_
_
8
26%
3
18%
5
36%
8
26%
2
25%
6
26%
8
26%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
_
_
_
_
11
35%
9
53%
2
14%
11
35%
2
25%
9
39%
11
35%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
_
_
_
_
4
13%
4
24%
0
0%
4
13%
1
13%
3
13%
4
13%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
6
27%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
7
32%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
5
23%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
6
27%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
27
3
1
28
1
30
22
8
30
8
22
30
PROFICIENT
37%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
37%
45%
13%
37%
25%
41%
37%
LEVEL 1
9
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
30%
6
27%
3
38%
9
30%
4
50%
5
23%
9
30%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
33%
6
27%
4
50%
10
33%
2
25%
8
36%
10
33%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
27%
7
32%
1
13%
8
27%
2
25%
6
27%
8
27%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
10%
3
14%
0
0%
3
10%
0
0%
3
14%
3
10%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
15
60%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
4
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
15
60%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
4
16%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
3
19%
LEVEL 2
10
63%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
15
60%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
4
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
3
19%
LEVEL 2
10
63%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
15
60%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
4
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
23
2
25
9
16
25
9
16
25
PROFICIENT
24%
_%
_%
24%
33%
19%
24%
33%
19%
24%
LEVEL 1
4
16%
_
_
_
_
4
16%
1
11%
3
19%
4
16%
1
11%
3
19%
4
16%
LEVEL 2
15
60%
_
_
_
_
15
60%
5
56%
10
63%
15
60%
5
56%
10
63%
15
60%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
_
_
_
_
2
8%
1
11%
1
6%
2
8%
2
22%
0
0%
2
8%
LEVEL 4
4
16%
_
_
_
_
4
16%
2
22%
2
13%
4
16%
1
11%
3
19%
4
16%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
6
27%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
6
27%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
6
27%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
6
27%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
22
21
1
22
10
12
22
8
14
22
PROFICIENT
36%
_%
_%
36%
30%
42%
36%
38%
36%
36%
LEVEL 1
6
27%
_
_
_
_
6
27%
2
20%
4
33%
6
27%
1
13%
5
36%
6
27%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
_
_
_
_
8
36%
5
50%
3
25%
8
36%
4
50%
4
29%
8
36%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
_
_
_
_
8
36%
3
30%
5
42%
8
36%
3
38%
5
36%
8
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
7
25%
LEVEL 2
14
50%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
7
25%
LEVEL 2
14
50%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
6
30%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
6
75%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
7
25%
LEVEL 2
14
50%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
10
50%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
7
25%
LEVEL 2
14
50%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
25
3
28
20
8
28
8
20
28
PROFICIENT
25%
_%
_%
25%
30%
13%
25%
25%
25%
25%
LEVEL 1
7
25%
_
_
_
_
7
25%
6
30%
1
13%
7
25%
2
25%
5
25%
7
25%
LEVEL 2
14
50%
_
_
_
_
14
50%
8
40%
6
75%
14
50%
4
50%
10
50%
14
50%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
_
_
_
_
6
21%
5
25%
1
13%
6
21%
2
25%
4
20%
6
21%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
5%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
5%
1
4%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 323
All Students
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
7
21%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
LEVEL 4
9
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
7
21%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
LEVEL 4
9
26%
Female
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
5
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
7
44%
LEVEL 4
4
25%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
7
21%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
LEVEL 4
9
26%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
6
22%
LEVEL 3
11
41%
LEVEL 4
7
26%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
7
21%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
LEVEL 4
9
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
32
2
33
1
34
18
16
34
7
27
34
PROFICIENT
71%
_%
_%
_%
_%
71%
72%
69%
71%
86%
67%
71%
LEVEL 1
3
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
9%
2
11%
1
6%
3
9%
0
0%
3
11%
3
9%
LEVEL 2
7
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
21%
3
17%
4
25%
7
21%
1
14%
6
22%
7
21%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
44%
8
44%
7
44%
15
44%
4
57%
11
41%
15
44%
LEVEL 4
9
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
26%
5
28%
4
25%
9
26%
2
29%
7
26%
9
26%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
16
52%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
16
52%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
10
56%
LEVEL 3
3
17%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
4
31%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
16
52%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
5
22%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
5
22%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
16
52%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
29
2
31
18
13
31
8
23
31
PROFICIENT
26%
_%
_%
26%
28%
23%
26%
13%
30%
26%
LEVEL 1
7
23%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
3
17%
4
31%
7
23%
2
25%
5
22%
7
23%
LEVEL 2
16
52%
_
_
_
_
16
52%
10
56%
6
46%
16
52%
5
63%
11
48%
16
52%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
_
_
_
_
6
19%
3
17%
3
23%
6
19%
1
13%
5
22%
6
19%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
2
11%
0
0%
2
6%
0
0%
2
9%
2
6%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
8
30%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
8
30%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
8
30%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
3
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
8
30%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
24
3
1
26
27
20
7
27
8
19
27
PROFICIENT
41%
_%
_%
_%
_%
41%
45%
29%
41%
50%
37%
41%
LEVEL 1
8
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
30%
5
25%
3
43%
8
30%
3
38%
5
26%
8
30%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
30%
6
30%
2
29%
8
30%
1
13%
7
37%
8
30%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
30%
6
30%
2
29%
8
30%
4
50%
4
21%
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
11%
3
15%
0
0%
3
11%
0
0%
3
16%
3
11%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
4
29%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
23
21
2
23
9
14
23
9
14
23
PROFICIENT
35%
_%
_%
35%
33%
36%
35%
33%
36%
35%
LEVEL 1
4
17%
_
_
_
_
4
17%
1
11%
3
21%
4
17%
0
0%
4
29%
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
_
_
_
_
11
48%
5
56%
6
43%
11
48%
6
67%
5
36%
11
48%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
_
_
_
_
4
17%
1
11%
3
21%
4
17%
3
33%
1
7%
4
17%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
_
_
_
_
4
17%
2
22%
2
14%
4
17%
0
0%
4
29%
4
17%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
19
1
20
10
10
20
9
11
20
PROFICIENT
20%
_%
_%
20%
10%
30%
20%
11%
27%
20%
LEVEL 1
8
40%
_
_
_
_
8
40%
5
50%
3
30%
8
40%
4
44%
4
36%
8
40%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
_
_
_
_
8
40%
4
40%
4
40%
8
40%
4
44%
4
36%
8
40%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
_
_
_
_
4
20%
1
10%
3
30%
4
20%
1
11%
3
27%
4
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
14
52%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
14
52%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
10
50%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
14
52%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
4
21%
LEVEL 2
11
58%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
14
52%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
25
2
27
20
7
27
8
19
27
PROFICIENT
15%
_%
_%
15%
15%
14%
15%
0%
21%
15%
LEVEL 1
9
33%
_
_
_
_
9
33%
7
35%
2
29%
9
33%
5
63%
4
21%
9
33%
LEVEL 2
14
52%
_
_
_
_
14
52%
10
50%
4
57%
14
52%
3
38%
11
58%
14
52%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
_
_
_
_
4
15%
3
15%
1
14%
4
15%
0
0%
4
21%
4
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 81
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
19
50%
LEVEL 4
16
42%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
19
50%
LEVEL 4
16
42%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
13
59%
Male
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
11
69%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
19
50%
LEVEL 4
16
42%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
4
44%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
15
52%
LEVEL 4
12
41%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
19
50%
LEVEL 4
16
42%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
38
36
2
38
22
16
38
9
29
38
PROFICIENT
92%
_%
_%
92%
95%
88%
92%
89%
93%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
_
_
_
_
3
8%
1
5%
2
13%
3
8%
1
11%
2
7%
3
8%
LEVEL 3
19
50%
_
_
_
_
19
50%
8
36%
11
69%
19
50%
4
44%
15
52%
19
50%
LEVEL 4
16
42%
_
_
_
_
16
42%
13
59%
3
19%
16
42%
4
44%
12
41%
16
42%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 72
All Students
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
Female
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
6
26%
LEVEL 3
13
57%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
91%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
6
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
17
68%
LEVEL 4
4
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
30
4
1
33
34
23
11
34
9
25
34
PROFICIENT
79%
_%
_%
_%
_%
79%
70%
100%
79%
67%
84%
79%
LEVEL 1
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
4%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
1
3%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
18%
6
26%
0
0%
6
18%
3
33%
3
12%
6
18%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
68%
13
57%
10
91%
23
68%
6
67%
17
68%
23
68%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
12%
3
13%
1
9%
4
12%
0
0%
4
16%
4
12%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
47%
LEVEL 4
17
47%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
11
42%
Male
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
6
32%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
5
42%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
17
52%
LEVEL 4
12
36%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
36
9
2
43
45
26
19
45
12
33
45
PROFICIENT
91%
94%
78%
_%
_%
91%
96%
84%
91%
100%
88%
91%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
5%
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
17
47%
7
78%
_
_
_
_
24
53%
14
54%
10
53%
24
53%
7
58%
17
52%
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
17
47%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
38%
11
42%
6
32%
17
38%
5
42%
12
36%
17
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
16
44%
LEVEL 4
17
47%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
12
46%
LEVEL 4
12
46%
Male
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
8
42%
LEVEL 4
5
26%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
6
50%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
14
42%
LEVEL 4
14
42%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
36
9
2
43
45
26
19
45
12
33
45
PROFICIENT
82%
92%
44%
_%
_%
82%
92%
68%
82%
75%
85%
82%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
1
8%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
1
3%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
5
11%
1
4%
4
21%
5
11%
2
17%
3
9%
5
11%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
16
44%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
20
44%
12
46%
8
42%
20
44%
6
50%
14
42%
20
44%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
17
47%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
38%
12
46%
5
26%
17
38%
3
25%
14
42%
17
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
50%
LEVEL 4
17
47%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
6
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
7
37%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
6
50%
LEVEL 4
5
42%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
55%
LEVEL 4
12
36%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
36
9
2
43
45
26
19
45
12
33
45
PROFICIENT
91%
97%
67%
_%
_%
91%
92%
89%
91%
92%
91%
91%
LEVEL 1
2
4%
0
0%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
1
4%
1
5%
2
4%
0
0%
2
6%
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
1
8%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
18
50%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
24
53%
14
54%
10
53%
24
53%
6
50%
18
55%
24
53%
LEVEL 4
17
38%
17
47%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
38%
10
38%
7
37%
17
38%
5
42%
12
36%
17
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
22
49%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
21
58%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
22
49%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
46%
LEVEL 4
13
50%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
42%
LEVEL 4
9
47%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
22
49%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
7
58%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
48%
LEVEL 4
15
45%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
LEVEL 4
22
49%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
36
9
2
43
45
26
19
45
12
33
45
PROFICIENT
93%
94%
89%
_%
_%
93%
96%
89%
93%
92%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
1
8%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
44%
13
36%
7
78%
_
_
_
_
20
44%
12
46%
8
42%
20
44%
4
33%
16
48%
20
44%
LEVEL 4
22
49%
21
58%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
22
49%
13
50%
9
47%
22
49%
7
58%
15
45%
22
49%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
18
40%
LEVEL 4
25
56%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
23
64%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
18
40%
LEVEL 4
25
56%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
11
42%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
7
37%
LEVEL 4
11
58%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
18
40%
LEVEL 4
25
56%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
8
67%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
14
42%
LEVEL 4
17
52%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
18
40%
LEVEL 4
25
56%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
36
9
2
43
45
26
19
45
12
33
45
PROFICIENT
96%
100%
78%
_%
_%
96%
96%
95%
96%
100%
94%
96%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
0
0%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
1
4%
1
5%
2
4%
0
0%
2
6%
2
4%
LEVEL 3
18
40%
13
36%
5
56%
_
_
_
_
18
40%
11
42%
7
37%
18
40%
4
33%
14
42%
18
40%
LEVEL 4
25
56%
23
64%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
25
56%
14
54%
11
58%
25
56%
8
67%
17
52%
25
56%
Regents Examination Results (2013 - 14)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
42
38
4
42
28
14
42
7
35
42
55
41
98%
_
_
_
_
41
98%
27
96%
14
100%
41
98%
7
100%
34
97%
41
98%
65
40
95%
_
_
_
_
40
95%
26
93%
14
100%
40
95%
7
100%
33
94%
40
95%
85
13
31%
_
_
_
_
13
31%
10
36%
3
21%
13
31%
0
0%
13
37%
13
31%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
98%
65
40
95%
85
13
31%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
98%
65
40
95%
85
13
31%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
26
93%
85
10
36%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
14
100%
85
3
21%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
98%
65
40
95%
85
13
31%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
97%
65
33
94%
85
13
37%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
98%
65
40
95%
85
13
31%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
17
1
18
13
5
18
4
14
18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
1
8%
0
0%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
LEVEL 3
11
61%
_
_
_
_
11
61%
8
62%
3
60%
11
61%
_
_
_
_
11
61%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
_
_
_
_
4
22%
2
15%
2
40%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
4
22%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
_
_
_
_
2
11%
2
15%
0
0%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
2
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
11
61%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
11
61%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
8
62%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
LEVEL 5
2
15%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
11
61%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
11
61%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
17
10
1
1
1
24
27
9
18
26
1
10
17
1
26
55
24
89%
16
94%
8
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
89%
9
100%
15
83%
_
_
_
_
9
90%
15
88%
_
_
_
_
65
19
70%
14
82%
5
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
70%
8
89%
11
61%
_
_
_
_
7
70%
12
71%
_
_
_
_
85
4
15%
3
18%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
15%
1
11%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
89%
65
19
70%
85
4
15%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
14
82%
85
3
18%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
80%
65
5
50%
85
1
10%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
89%
65
19
70%
85
4
15%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
1
11%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
83%
65
11
61%
85
3
17%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
7
70%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
88%
65
12
71%
85
4
24%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
31
31
17
14
31
4
27
31
55
30
97%
30
97%
30
97%
16
94%
14
100%
30
97%
_
_
_
_
30
97%
65
24
77%
24
77%
24
77%
14
82%
10
71%
24
77%
_
_
_
_
24
77%
85
7
23%
7
23%
7
23%
5
29%
2
14%
7
23%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
97%
65
24
77%
85
7
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
97%
65
24
77%
85
7
23%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
97%
65
24
77%
85
7
23%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
14
82%
85
5
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
10
71%
85
2
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
97%
65
24
77%
85
7
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
97%
65
24
77%
85
7
23%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
26
26
19
7
26
5
21
26
55
20
77%
20
77%
20
77%
14
74%
6
86%
20
77%
2
40%
18
86%
20
77%
65
14
54%
14
54%
14
54%
10
53%
4
57%
14
54%
1
20%
13
62%
14
54%
85
3
12%
3
12%
3
12%
2
11%
1
14%
3
12%
0
0%
3
14%
3
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
77%
65
14
54%
85
3
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
77%
65
14
54%
85
3
12%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
77%
65
14
54%
85
3
12%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
74%
65
10
53%
85
2
11%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
4
57%
85
1
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
77%
65
14
54%
85
3
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
86%
65
13
62%
85
3
14%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
77%
65
14
54%
85
3
12%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
8
1
9
4
5
9
4
5
9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
_
_
_
_
8
89%
_
_
_
_
8
89%
_
_
_
_
8
89%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
41
10
1
1
1
48
51
22
29
50
1
8
43
1
50
55
47
92%
41
100%
6
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
92%
22
100%
25
86%
_
_
_
_
7
88%
40
93%
_
_
_
_
65
44
86%
40
98%
4
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
86%
21
95%
23
79%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
39
91%
_
_
_
_
85
24
47%
22
54%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
47%
9
41%
15
52%
_
_
_
_
3
38%
21
49%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
92%
65
44
86%
85
24
47%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
100%
65
40
98%
85
22
54%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
60%
65
4
40%
85
2
20%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
92%
65
44
86%
85
24
47%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
100%
65
21
95%
85
9
41%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
86%
65
23
79%
85
15
52%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
5
63%
85
3
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
93%
65
39
91%
85
21
49%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
35
5
40
26
14
40
7
33
40
55
40
100%
35
100%
5
100%
40
100%
26
100%
14
100%
40
100%
7
100%
33
100%
40
100%
65
37
93%
34
97%
3
60%
37
93%
25
96%
12
86%
37
93%
5
71%
32
97%
37
93%
85
19
48%
19
54%
0
0%
19
48%
13
50%
6
43%
19
48%
1
14%
18
55%
19
48%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
37
93%
85
19
48%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
100%
65
34
97%
85
19
54%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
37
93%
85
19
48%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
100%
65
25
96%
85
13
50%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
6
43%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
37
93%
85
19
48%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
5
71%
85
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
100%
65
32
97%
85
18
55%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
37
93%
85
19
48%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
40
11
1
1
49
51
23
28
50
1
8
43
1
50
55
50
98%
40
100%
10
91%
_
_
_
_
_
_
50
98%
23
100%
27
96%
_
_
_
_
8
100%
42
98%
_
_
_
_
65
49
96%
39
98%
10
91%
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
96%
23
100%
26
93%
_
_
_
_
7
88%
42
98%
_
_
_
_
85
30
59%
30
75%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
59%
16
70%
14
50%
_
_
_
_
3
38%
27
63%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
98%
65
49
96%
85
30
59%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
39
98%
85
30
75%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
10
91%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
98%
65
49
96%
85
30
59%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
100%
65
23
100%
85
16
70%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
26
93%
85
14
50%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
3
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
42
98%
85
27
63%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
30
4
34
19
15
34
12
22
34
55
31
91%
_
_
_
_
31
91%
18
95%
13
87%
31
91%
11
92%
20
91%
31
91%
65
27
79%
_
_
_
_
27
79%
14
74%
13
87%
27
79%
9
75%
18
82%
27
79%
85
8
24%
_
_
_
_
8
24%
5
26%
3
20%
8
24%
1
8%
7
32%
8
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
27
79%
85
8
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
27
79%
85
8
24%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
95%
65
14
74%
85
5
26%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
87%
65
13
87%
85
3
20%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
27
79%
85
8
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
9
75%
85
1
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
18
82%
85
7
32%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
27
79%
85
8
24%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
23
1
24
16
8
24
4
20
24
55
24
100%
_
_
_
_
24
100%
16
100%
8
100%
24
100%
_
_
_
_
24
100%
65
19
79%
_
_
_
_
19
79%
14
88%
5
63%
19
79%
_
_
_
_
19
79%
85
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
6%
0
0%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
19
79%
85
1
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
19
79%
85
1
4%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
14
88%
85
1
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
5
63%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
19
79%
85
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
19
79%
85
1
4%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2013 - 14)
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
0
0
3
0
426*
2
19
0
125*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
―
―
―
―
88%*
―
―
―
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
0
0
1
0
167
2
14
0
47
PI
119
―
―
―
―
118
―
―
―
117
EAMO
81
―
―
―
―
101
―
―
―
61
Safe Harbor Target
81
―
―
―
―
101
―
―
―
61
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
119
EAMO
81
Safe Harbor Target
81
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
426*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
167
PI
118
EAMO
101
Safe Harbor Target
101
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
125*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47
PI
117
EAMO
61
Safe Harbor Target
61
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
437*
430*
436*
5
434*
396*
437*
312*
209*
228*
0
436*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
88%*
88%*
88%*
―
88%*
88%*
88%*
86%*
84%*
91%*
―
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
170
169
170
3
168
156
170
123
73
97
0
170
PI
119
119
118
119
―
118
126
119
120
100
133
―
119
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
119
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
119
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
430*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
169
PI
118
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
436*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
119
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
434*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
168
PI
118
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
396*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
156
PI
126
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
119
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
312*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
PI
120
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
209*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
73
PI
100
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
228*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
97
PI
133
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
436*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
119
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
0
0
3
0
426*
2
19
0
125*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
―
―
―
―
85%*
―
―
―
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
0
0
1
0
160
1
13
0
48
PI
112
―
―
―
―
111
―
―
―
104
EAMO
78
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
58
Safe Harbor Target
78
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
58
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
112
EAMO
78
Safe Harbor Target
78
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
426*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
160
PI
111
EAMO
97
Safe Harbor Target
97
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
125*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48
PI
104
EAMO
58
Safe Harbor Target
58
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
437*
430*
436*
5
434*
396*
437*
312*
209*
228*
0
436*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
85%*
85%*
85%*
―
85%*
85%*
85%*
83%*
80%*
89%*
―
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
162
161
162
2
161
149
162
114
67
95
0
162
PI
112
112
112
112
―
112
115
112
116
113
112
―
112
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
112
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
112
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
430*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
161
PI
112
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
436*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
112
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
434*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
161
PI
112
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
396*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
149
PI
115
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
112
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
312*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
114
PI
116
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
209*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
67
PI
113
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
228*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
95
PI
112
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
436*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
112
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
0
0
1
0
73
0
6
0
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
―
―
―
―
97%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
0
0
1
0
70
0
6
0
17
PI
186
―
―
―
―
186
―
―
―
―
EAMO
172
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
172
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
186
EAMO
172
Progress Target
172
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
73
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
186
EAMO
181
Progress Target
181
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
74
73
74
1
74
68
74
55
29
45
0
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
97%
97%
97%
―
97%
97%
97%
98%
―
100%
―
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
71
70
71
1
71
65
71
54
27
44
0
71
PI
186
186
186
186
―
186
189
186
187
―
182
―
186
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
186
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
186
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
73
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
186
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
186
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
186
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
68
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
65
PI
189
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
186
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
55
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
187
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
27
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
45
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
44
PI
182
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
186
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
43
0
0
0
0
43
0
8
0
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
0
0
0
0
42
0
9
0
12
PI
169
―
―
―
―
169
―
―
―
―
EAMO
151
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
151
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
EAMO
151
Safe Harbor Target
151
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
EAMO
163
Safe Harbor Target
163
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
43
43
43
43
0
43
35
43
31
16
27
0
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
―
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
42
42
42
0
42
33
42
30
17
25
0
42
PI
169
169
169
169
―
169
185
169
167
―
―
―
169
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
General Education
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
185
English Proficient
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
30
PI
167
Male
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
25
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
169
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2010 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
43
0
0
0
0
43
0
8
0
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
0
0
0
0
42
0
9
0
12
PI
140
―
―
―
―
140
―
―
―
―
EAMO
133
―
―
―
―
147
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
133
―
―
―
―
147
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
EAMO
133
Safe Harbor Target
133
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
EAMO
147
Safe Harbor Target
147
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
43
43
43
43
0
43
35
43
31
16
27
0
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
―
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
42
42
42
0
42
33
42
30
17
25
0
42
PI
140
140
140
140
―
140
167
140
150
―
―
―
140
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
General Education
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
167
English Proficient
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
30
PI
150
Male
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
25
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
43
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
42
PI
140
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2010 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
119
―
―
―
―
118
―
―
―
117
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
112
―
―
―
―
111
―
―
―
104
Secondary-Level ELA PI
169
―
―
―
―
169
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
140
―
―
―
―
140
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
135
0
0
0
0
135
0
0
0
111
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
119
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
112
Secondary-Level ELA PI
169
Secondary-Level MATH PI
140
Unweighted Combined PI
135
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
118
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
111
Secondary-Level ELA PI
169
Secondary-Level MATH PI
140
Unweighted Combined PI
135
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
117
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
104
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
111
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
0
0
1
0
36
0
5
0
6
Graduation Rate
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
0
0
0
0
45
0
3
0
10
Graduation Rate
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
37
36
37
1
37
32
37
31
17
20
0
37
Graduation Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
100%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
45
45
45
0
45
42
45
35
25
20
0
45
Graduation Rate
98%
98%
98%
98%
―
98%
98%
98%
97%
―
―
―
98%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Black or African American
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
Not White
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
General Education
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
100%
English Proficient
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
100%
Male
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
20
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Black or African American
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
Not White
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
General Education
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
42
Graduation Rate
98%
English Proficient
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35
Graduation Rate
97%
Male
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
25
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
20
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
98%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2009 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2013 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
11%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
4%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
