The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
55%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
12%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
55%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
12%
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
1
10
70
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
Principals
3
Assistant Principals
1
Other Professional Staff
10
Paraprofessionals
70
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS
135
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
1%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
4%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
4%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
332
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
484
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 135
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
1%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
4%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
4%
Total Number of Core Classes
332
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
484
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
124
111
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
121
111
10
REGENTS DIPLOMA
110
91%
107
96%
3
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
53
44%
53
48%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
44
36%
42
38%
2
20%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
11
9%
4
4%
7
70%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
2%
0
0%
3
23%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
124
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
121
Regents Diploma
110
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
44%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
44
36%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
111
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
111
Regents Diploma
107
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
42
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
10
Regents Diploma
3
30%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
70%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
23%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
124
111
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
121
111
10
REGENTS DIPLOMA
110
91%
107
96%
3
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
53
44%
53
48%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
44
36%
42
38%
2
20%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
11
9%
4
4%
7
70%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
2%
0
0%
3
23%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
124
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
121
Regents Diploma
110
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
44%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
44
36%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
111
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
111
Regents Diploma
107
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
42
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
10
Regents Diploma
3
30%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
70%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
23%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
124
111
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
121
111
10
REGENTS DIPLOMA
110
91%
107
96%
3
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
53
44%
53
48%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
44
36%
42
38%
2
20%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
11
9%
4
4%
7
70%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
2%
0
0%
3
23%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
124
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
121
Regents Diploma
110
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
44%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
44
36%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
111
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
111
Regents Diploma
107
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
42
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
10
Regents Diploma
3
30%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
70%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
23%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
14
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
14
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
14
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
14
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
14
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
14
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
35
28%
35
32%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
43
35%
42
38%
1
8%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
TO THE MILITARY
9
7%
9
8%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
32
26%
23
21%
9
69%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
All Students
To Four-Year College
35
28%
To Two-Year College
43
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
9
7%
To Employment
32
26%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
35
32%
To Two-Year College
42
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
9
8%
To Employment
23
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
8%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
8%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
9
69%
To Adult Services
1
8%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
35
28%
35
32%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
43
35%
42
38%
1
8%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
TO THE MILITARY
9
7%
9
8%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
32
26%
23
21%
9
69%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
All Students
To Four-Year College
35
28%
To Two-Year College
43
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
9
7%
To Employment
32
26%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
35
32%
To Two-Year College
42
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
9
8%
To Employment
23
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
8%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
8%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
9
69%
To Adult Services
1
8%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
35
28%
35
32%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
43
35%
42
38%
1
8%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
TO THE MILITARY
9
7%
9
8%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
32
26%
23
21%
9
69%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
All Students
To Four-Year College
35
28%
To Two-Year College
43
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
9
7%
To Employment
32
26%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
35
32%
To Two-Year College
42
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
9
8%
To Employment
23
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
8%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
8%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
9
69%
To Adult Services
1
8%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
8%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
39
31%
LEVEL 2
49
39%
LEVEL 3
36
29%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
28
26%
LEVEL 2
45
42%
LEVEL 3
33
31%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
11
61%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
3
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
34
29%
LEVEL 2
47
40%
LEVEL 3
35
30%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
17
26%
LEVEL 2
27
42%
LEVEL 3
20
31%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
22
37%
LEVEL 2
22
37%
LEVEL 3
16
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
24
38%
LEVEL 2
27
43%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
15
24%
LEVEL 2
22
35%
LEVEL 3
24
39%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
39
31%
LEVEL 2
49
39%
LEVEL 3
36
29%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
107
18
3
3
117
2
8
65
60
124
1
63
62
125
PROFICIENT
30%
32%
17%
_%
_%
31%
_%
13%
32%
27%
_%
_%
19%
40%
30%
LEVEL 1
39
31%
28
26%
11
61%
_
_
_
_
34
29%
_
_
5
63%
17
26%
22
37%
_
_
_
_
24
38%
15
24%
39
31%
LEVEL 2
49
39%
45
42%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
47
40%
_
_
2
25%
27
42%
22
37%
_
_
_
_
27
43%
22
35%
49
39%
LEVEL 3
36
29%
33
31%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
35
30%
_
_
1
13%
20
31%
16
27%
_
_
_
_
12
19%
24
39%
36
29%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
42
38%
LEVEL 2
43
39%
LEVEL 3
20
18%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
25
28%
LEVEL 2
38
43%
LEVEL 3
20
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
17
77%
LEVEL 2
5
23%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
42
38%
LEVEL 2
43
39%
LEVEL 3
20
18%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
20
38%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
22
39%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
42
38%
LEVEL 2
43
39%
LEVEL 3
20
18%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
27
47%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
15
29%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
12
23%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
42
38%
LEVEL 2
43
39%
LEVEL 3
20
18%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
110
88
22
1
2
106
1
110
53
57
110
58
52
110
PROFICIENT
23%
28%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
23%
25%
21%
23%
14%
33%
23%
LEVEL 1
42
38%
25
28%
17
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
38%
20
38%
22
39%
42
38%
27
47%
15
29%
42
38%
LEVEL 2
43
39%
38
43%
5
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
39%
20
38%
23
40%
43
39%
23
40%
20
38%
43
39%
LEVEL 3
20
18%
20
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
18%
10
19%
10
18%
20
18%
8
14%
12
23%
20
18%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
5
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
5%
3
6%
2
4%
5
5%
0
0%
5
10%
5
5%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 292
All Students
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
47
45%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
28
35%
LEVEL 2
34
42%
LEVEL 3
18
22%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
19
79%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
47
45%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
20
42%
LEVEL 2
18
38%
LEVEL 3
10
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
27
47%
LEVEL 2
20
35%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
47
45%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
32
57%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
LEVEL 3
7
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
15
31%
LEVEL 2
21
43%
LEVEL 3
12
24%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
47
45%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
105
81
24
1
2
1
101
105
48
57
105
56
49
105
PROFICIENT
19%
23%
4%
_%
_%
_%
_%
19%
21%
18%
19%
13%
27%
19%
LEVEL 1
47
45%
28
35%
19
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
45%
20
42%
27
47%
47
45%
32
57%
15
31%
47
45%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
34
42%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
36%
18
38%
20
35%
38
36%
17
30%
21
43%
38
36%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
18
22%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
18%
10
21%
9
16%
19
18%
7
13%
12
24%
19
18%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
27
27%
LEVEL 2
37
37%
LEVEL 3
26
26%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
12
15%
LEVEL 2
33
42%
LEVEL 3
25
32%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
15
75%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
27
27%
LEVEL 2
37
37%
LEVEL 3
26
26%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
11
25%
LEVEL 2
13
30%
LEVEL 3
14
32%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
16
29%
LEVEL 2
24
44%
LEVEL 3
12
22%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
27
27%
LEVEL 2
37
37%
LEVEL 3
26
26%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
19
40%
LEVEL 2
19
40%
LEVEL 3
8
17%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
18
35%
LEVEL 4
7
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
27
27%
LEVEL 2
37
37%
LEVEL 3
26
26%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
79
20
1
1
97
99
44
55
99
48
51
99
PROFICIENT
35%
43%
5%
_%
_%
_%
35%
45%
27%
35%
21%
49%
35%
LEVEL 1
27
27%
12
15%
15
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
27%
11
25%
16
29%
27
27%
19
40%
8
16%
27
27%
LEVEL 2
37
37%
33
42%
4
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
37%
13
30%
24
44%
37
37%
19
40%
18
35%
37
37%
LEVEL 3
26
26%
25
32%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
26%
14
32%
12
22%
26
26%
8
17%
18
35%
26
26%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
9
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
9%
6
14%
3
5%
9
9%
2
4%
7
14%
9
9%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
46
39%
LEVEL 2
44
37%
LEVEL 3
20
17%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
27
29%
LEVEL 2
40
43%
LEVEL 3
19
20%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
19
79%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
46
39%
LEVEL 2
44
37%
LEVEL 3
20
17%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
18
32%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
28
46%
LEVEL 2
22
36%
LEVEL 3
8
13%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
46
39%
LEVEL 2
44
37%
LEVEL 3
20
17%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
27
51%
LEVEL 2
16
30%
LEVEL 3
8
15%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
19
29%
LEVEL 2
28
43%
LEVEL 3
12
18%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
46
39%
LEVEL 2
44
37%
LEVEL 3
20
17%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
118
94
24
2
1
115
118
57
61
118
53
65
118
PROFICIENT
24%
29%
4%
_%
_%
_%
24%
30%
18%
24%
19%
28%
24%
LEVEL 1
46
39%
27
29%
19
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
39%
18
32%
28
46%
46
39%
27
51%
19
29%
46
39%
LEVEL 2
44
37%
40
43%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
37%
22
39%
22
36%
44
37%
16
30%
28
43%
44
37%
LEVEL 3
20
17%
19
20%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
17%
12
21%
8
13%
20
17%
8
15%
12
18%
20
17%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
8
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
7%
5
9%
3
5%
8
7%
2
4%
6
9%
8
7%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
37
31%
LEVEL 2
40
34%
LEVEL 3
30
25%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
18
18%
LEVEL 2
38
39%
LEVEL 3
30
31%
LEVEL 4
12
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
19
90%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
37
31%
LEVEL 2
40
34%
LEVEL 3
30
25%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
19
31%
LEVEL 2
17
28%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
18
31%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
37
31%
LEVEL 2
40
34%
LEVEL 3
30
25%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
25
56%
LEVEL 2
10
22%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
12
16%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
37
31%
LEVEL 2
40
34%
LEVEL 3
30
25%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
119
98
21
1
2
1
115
119
61
58
119
45
74
119
PROFICIENT
35%
43%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
35%
41%
29%
35%
22%
43%
35%
LEVEL 1
37
31%
18
18%
19
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
31%
19
31%
18
31%
37
31%
25
56%
12
16%
37
31%
LEVEL 2
40
34%
38
39%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
34%
17
28%
23
40%
40
34%
10
22%
30
41%
40
34%
LEVEL 3
30
25%
30
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
25%
17
28%
13
22%
30
25%
9
20%
21
28%
30
25%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
12
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
10%
8
13%
4
7%
12
10%
1
2%
11
15%
12
10%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
40
32%
LEVEL 2
51
40%
LEVEL 3
26
21%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
29
27%
LEVEL 2
48
45%
LEVEL 3
24
22%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
11
58%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
3
16%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
36
31%
LEVEL 2
48
41%
LEVEL 3
25
21%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
21
32%
LEVEL 2
26
39%
LEVEL 3
15
23%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
19
32%
LEVEL 2
25
42%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
28
44%
LEVEL 2
21
33%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
12
19%
LEVEL 2
30
48%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
40
32%
LEVEL 2
51
40%
LEVEL 3
26
21%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
126
107
19
3
3
118
2
8
66
60
125
1
63
63
126
PROFICIENT
28%
28%
26%
_%
_%
29%
_%
13%
29%
27%
_%
_%
22%
33%
28%
LEVEL 1
40
32%
29
27%
11
58%
_
_
_
_
36
31%
_
_
4
50%
21
32%
19
32%
_
_
_
_
28
44%
12
19%
40
32%
LEVEL 2
51
40%
48
45%
3
16%
_
_
_
_
48
41%
_
_
3
38%
26
39%
25
42%
_
_
_
_
21
33%
30
48%
51
40%
LEVEL 3
26
21%
24
22%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
25
21%
_
_
1
13%
15
23%
11
18%
_
_
_
_
10
16%
16
25%
26
21%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
6
6%
3
16%
_
_
_
_
9
8%
_
_
0
0%
4
6%
5
8%
_
_
_
_
4
6%
5
8%
9
7%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 290
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
44
41%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
23
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
29
34%
LEVEL 2
29
34%
LEVEL 3
23
27%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
15
68%
LEVEL 2
7
32%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
44
41%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
23
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
21
40%
LEVEL 2
19
37%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
23
41%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
44
41%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
23
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
25
44%
LEVEL 2
24
42%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
19
37%
LEVEL 2
12
24%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
44
41%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
23
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
108
86
22
1
2
104
1
108
52
56
108
57
51
108
PROFICIENT
26%
33%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
26%
23%
29%
26%
14%
39%
26%
LEVEL 1
44
41%
29
34%
15
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
41%
21
40%
23
41%
44
41%
25
44%
19
37%
44
41%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
29
34%
7
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
33%
19
37%
17
30%
36
33%
24
42%
12
24%
36
33%
LEVEL 3
23
21%
23
27%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
21%
10
19%
13
23%
23
21%
8
14%
15
29%
23
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
5
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
5%
2
4%
3
5%
5
5%
0
0%
5
10%
5
5%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
61
58%
LEVEL 2
30
28%
LEVEL 3
14
13%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
42
52%
LEVEL 2
25
31%
LEVEL 3
13
16%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
19
76%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
61
58%
LEVEL 2
30
28%
LEVEL 3
14
13%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
26
54%
LEVEL 2
15
31%
LEVEL 3
7
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
35
60%
LEVEL 2
15
26%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
61
58%
LEVEL 2
30
28%
LEVEL 3
14
13%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
39
70%
LEVEL 2
11
20%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
22
44%
LEVEL 2
19
38%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
61
58%
LEVEL 2
30
28%
LEVEL 3
14
13%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
106
81
25
1
2
1
102
106
48
58
106
56
50
106
PROFICIENT
14%
17%
4%
_%
_%
_%
_%
14%
15%
14%
14%
11%
18%
14%
LEVEL 1
61
58%
42
52%
19
76%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
61
58%
26
54%
35
60%
61
58%
39
70%
22
44%
61
58%
LEVEL 2
30
28%
25
31%
5
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
28%
15
31%
15
26%
30
28%
11
20%
19
38%
30
28%
LEVEL 3
14
13%
13
16%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
13%
7
15%
7
12%
14
13%
6
11%
8
16%
14
13%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
9
11%
LEVEL 2
39
49%
LEVEL 3
21
27%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
15
75%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
10
23%
LEVEL 2
20
45%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
14
25%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
12
22%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
16
33%
LEVEL 2
26
54%
LEVEL 3
6
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
17
33%
LEVEL 3
16
31%
LEVEL 4
10
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
79
20
1
1
97
99
44
55
99
48
51
99
PROFICIENT
32%
39%
5%
_%
_%
_%
32%
32%
33%
32%
13%
51%
32%
LEVEL 1
24
24%
9
11%
15
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
24%
10
23%
14
25%
24
24%
16
33%
8
16%
24
24%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
39
49%
4
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
43%
20
45%
23
42%
43
43%
26
54%
17
33%
43
43%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
21
27%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
22%
10
23%
12
22%
22
22%
6
13%
16
31%
22
22%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
10
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
10%
4
9%
6
11%
10
10%
0
0%
10
20%
10
10%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
42
36%
LEVEL 2
45
38%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
22
24%
LEVEL 2
41
44%
LEVEL 3
24
26%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
20
83%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
42
36%
LEVEL 2
45
38%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
20
35%
LEVEL 2
24
42%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
22
37%
LEVEL 2
21
35%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
42
36%
LEVEL 2
45
38%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
28
53%
LEVEL 2
19
36%
LEVEL 3
5
9%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
26
41%
LEVEL 3
19
30%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
42
36%
LEVEL 2
45
38%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
117
93
24
2
1
114
117
57
60
117
53
64
117
PROFICIENT
26%
32%
0%
_%
_%
_%
26%
23%
28%
26%
11%
38%
26%
LEVEL 1
42
36%
22
24%
20
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
36%
20
35%
22
37%
42
36%
28
53%
14
22%
42
36%
LEVEL 2
45
38%
41
44%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
38%
24
42%
21
35%
45
38%
19
36%
26
41%
45
38%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
24
26%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
21%
10
18%
14
23%
24
21%
5
9%
19
30%
24
21%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
6
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
3
5%
3
5%
6
5%
1
2%
5
8%
6
5%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
29
24%
LEVEL 2
62
52%
LEVEL 3
27
23%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
17
17%
LEVEL 2
54
55%
LEVEL 3
26
27%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
12
57%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
29
24%
LEVEL 2
62
52%
LEVEL 3
27
23%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
13
21%
LEVEL 2
32
52%
LEVEL 3
16
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
16
28%
LEVEL 2
30
52%
LEVEL 3
11
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
29
24%
LEVEL 2
62
52%
LEVEL 3
27
23%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
15
33%
LEVEL 2
25
56%
LEVEL 3
5
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
14
19%
LEVEL 2
37
50%
LEVEL 3
22
30%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
29
24%
LEVEL 2
62
52%
LEVEL 3
27
23%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
119
98
21
1
2
1
115
119
61
58
119
45
74
119
PROFICIENT
24%
28%
5%
_%
_%
_%
_%
24%
26%
21%
24%
11%
31%
24%
LEVEL 1
29
24%
17
17%
12
57%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
24%
13
21%
16
28%
29
24%
15
33%
14
19%
29
24%
LEVEL 2
62
52%
54
55%
8
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
62
52%
32
52%
30
52%
62
52%
25
56%
37
50%
62
52%
LEVEL 3
27
23%
26
27%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
23%
16
26%
11
19%
27
23%
5
11%
22
30%
27
23%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 84
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
34
32%
LEVEL 4
63
60%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
27
32%
LEVEL 4
57
68%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
4
19%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
7
33%
LEVEL 4
6
29%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
34
32%
LEVEL 4
63
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
17
32%
LEVEL 4
32
60%
Male
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
17
33%
LEVEL 4
31
60%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
34
32%
LEVEL 4
63
60%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
23
41%
LEVEL 4
28
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
35
71%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
34
32%
LEVEL 4
63
60%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
105
84
21
1
1
102
1
105
53
52
105
56
49
105
PROFICIENT
92%
100%
62%
_%
_%
_%
_%
92%
92%
92%
92%
91%
94%
92%
LEVEL 1
4
4%
0
0%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
3
6%
1
2%
4
4%
2
4%
2
4%
4
4%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
0
0%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
1
2%
3
6%
4
4%
3
5%
1
2%
4
4%
LEVEL 3
34
32%
27
32%
7
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
32%
17
32%
17
33%
34
32%
23
41%
11
22%
34
32%
LEVEL 4
63
60%
57
68%
6
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
63
60%
32
60%
31
60%
63
60%
28
50%
35
71%
63
60%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 80
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
47
51%
LEVEL 4
39
42%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
33
46%
LEVEL 4
37
51%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
24%
LEVEL 3
14
67%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
47
51%
LEVEL 4
39
42%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
26
57%
LEVEL 4
18
39%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
21
45%
LEVEL 4
21
45%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
47
51%
LEVEL 4
39
42%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
24
56%
LEVEL 4
16
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
23
46%
LEVEL 4
23
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
47
51%
LEVEL 4
39
42%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
93
72
21
2
1
90
93
46
47
93
43
50
93
PROFICIENT
92%
97%
76%
_%
_%
_%
92%
96%
89%
92%
93%
92%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
2
3%
5
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
8%
2
4%
5
11%
7
8%
3
7%
4
8%
7
8%
LEVEL 3
47
51%
33
46%
14
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
51%
26
57%
21
45%
47
51%
24
56%
23
46%
47
51%
LEVEL 4
39
42%
37
51%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
42%
18
39%
21
45%
39
42%
16
37%
23
46%
39
42%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
26
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
26
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
26
100%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
60
43%
LEVEL 4
48
35%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
56
48%
LEVEL 4
47
41%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
4
18%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
57
43%
LEVEL 4
47
36%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
25
41%
LEVEL 4
25
41%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
35
45%
LEVEL 4
23
30%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
21
49%
LEVEL 4
8
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
39
41%
LEVEL 4
40
42%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
60
43%
LEVEL 4
48
35%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
138
116
22
2
2
2
132
6
61
77
137
1
43
95
138
PROFICIENT
78%
89%
23%
_%
_%
_%
79%
67%
82%
75%
_%
_%
67%
83%
78%
LEVEL 1
3
2%
0
0%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
2%
0
0%
1
2%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
1%
3
2%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
4
3%
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
6%
0
0%
3
5%
5
6%
_
_
_
_
5
12%
3
3%
8
6%
LEVEL 3
60
43%
56
48%
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
57
43%
3
50%
25
41%
35
45%
_
_
_
_
21
49%
39
41%
60
43%
LEVEL 4
48
35%
47
41%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
36%
1
17%
25
41%
23
30%
_
_
_
_
8
19%
40
42%
48
35%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
77
56%
LEVEL 4
37
27%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
74
64%
LEVEL 4
37
32%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
8
36%
LEVEL 2
4
18%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
76
58%
LEVEL 4
34
26%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
3
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
32
52%
LEVEL 4
20
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
45
58%
LEVEL 4
17
22%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
27
63%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
5
5%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
50
53%
LEVEL 4
31
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
77
56%
LEVEL 4
37
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
138
116
22
2
2
2
132
6
61
77
137
1
43
95
138
PROFICIENT
83%
96%
14%
_%
_%
_%
83%
67%
85%
81%
_%
_%
77%
85%
83%
LEVEL 1
8
6%
0
0%
8
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
1
17%
1
2%
7
9%
_
_
_
_
3
7%
5
5%
8
6%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
1
1%
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
4%
0
0%
3
5%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
3
3%
5
4%
LEVEL 3
77
56%
74
64%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
76
58%
1
17%
32
52%
45
58%
_
_
_
_
27
63%
50
53%
77
56%
LEVEL 4
37
27%
37
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
26%
3
50%
20
33%
17
22%
_
_
_
_
6
14%
31
33%
37
27%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
58
42%
LEVEL 4
53
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
55
47%
LEVEL 4
51
44%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
5
23%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
57
43%
LEVEL 4
50
38%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
3
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
26
43%
LEVEL 4
27
44%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
32
42%
LEVEL 4
26
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
22
51%
LEVEL 4
9
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
36
38%
LEVEL 4
44
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
58
42%
LEVEL 4
53
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
138
116
22
2
2
2
132
6
61
77
137
1
43
95
138
PROFICIENT
80%
91%
23%
_%
_%
_%
81%
67%
87%
75%
_%
_%
72%
84%
80%
LEVEL 1
5
4%
2
2%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
4%
0
0%
2
3%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
3
7%
2
2%
5
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
2
2%
5
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
0
0%
1
2%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
4
9%
3
3%
7
5%
LEVEL 3
58
42%
55
47%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
57
43%
1
17%
26
43%
32
42%
_
_
_
_
22
51%
36
38%
58
42%
LEVEL 4
53
38%
51
44%
2
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
50
38%
3
50%
27
44%
26
34%
_
_
_
_
9
21%
44
46%
53
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
50
36%
LEVEL 4
59
43%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
58
50%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
6
27%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
49
37%
LEVEL 4
56
42%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
3
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
22
36%
LEVEL 4
28
46%
Male
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
28
36%
LEVEL 4
31
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
16
37%
LEVEL 4
13
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
34
36%
LEVEL 4
46
48%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
50
36%
LEVEL 4
59
43%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
138
116
22
2
2
2
132
6
61
77
137
1
43
95
138
PROFICIENT
79%
91%
18%
_%
_%
_%
80%
67%
82%
77%
_%
_%
67%
84%
79%
LEVEL 1
6
4%
0
0%
6
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
0
0%
1
2%
5
6%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
4
4%
6
4%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
2
2%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
4%
0
0%
3
5%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
5
12%
0
0%
5
4%
LEVEL 3
50
36%
47
41%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
37%
1
17%
22
36%
28
36%
_
_
_
_
16
37%
34
36%
50
36%
LEVEL 4
59
43%
58
50%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
42%
3
50%
28
46%
31
40%
_
_
_
_
13
30%
46
48%
59
43%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
51
37%
LEVEL 4
64
46%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
62
53%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
2
9%
LEVEL 2
5
23%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
49
37%
LEVEL 4
61
46%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
3
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
21
34%
LEVEL 4
33
54%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
30
39%
LEVEL 4
31
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
22
51%
LEVEL 4
13
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
29
31%
LEVEL 4
51
54%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
51
37%
LEVEL 4
64
46%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
138
116
22
2
2
2
132
6
61
77
137
1
43
95
138
PROFICIENT
83%
94%
27%
_%
_%
_%
83%
83%
89%
79%
_%
_%
81%
84%
83%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
0
0%
0
0%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
2
2%
5
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
0
0%
1
2%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
4
9%
3
3%
7
5%
LEVEL 3
51
37%
47
41%
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
37%
2
33%
21
34%
30
39%
_
_
_
_
22
51%
29
31%
51
37%
LEVEL 4
64
46%
62
53%
2
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
61
46%
3
50%
33
54%
31
40%
_
_
_
_
13
30%
51
54%
64
46%
Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
111
95
16
0
0
3
0
108
0
111
55
56
111
0
33
78
0
111
55
109
98%
95
100%
14
88%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
109
98%
54
98%
55
98%
109
98%
0
0%
31
94%
78
100%
0
0%
109
98%
65
95
86%
87
92%
8
50%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
95
86%
48
87%
47
84%
95
86%
0
0%
22
67%
73
94%
0
0%
95
86%
85
43
39%
43
45%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
43
39%
26
47%
17
30%
43
39%
0
0%
4
12%
39
50%
0
0%
43
39%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
98%
65
95
86%
85
43
39%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
95
100%
65
87
92%
85
43
45%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
88%
65
8
50%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
98%
65
95
86%
85
43
39%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
98%
65
48
87%
85
26
47%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
98%
65
47
84%
85
17
30%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
98%
65
95
86%
85
43
39%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
22
67%
85
4
12%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
78
100%
65
73
94%
85
39
50%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
98%
65
95
86%
85
43
39%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
137
121
16
0
1
1
1
133
1
137
69
68
136
1
43
94
0
137
55
131
96%
118
98%
13
81%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
131
96%
67
97%
64
94%
_
_
_
_
41
95%
90
96%
0
0%
131
96%
65
116
85%
107
88%
9
56%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
116
85%
60
87%
56
82%
_
_
_
_
36
84%
80
85%
0
0%
116
85%
85
22
16%
22
18%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
16%
14
20%
8
12%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
21
22%
0
0%
22
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
131
96%
65
116
85%
85
22
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
118
98%
65
107
88%
85
22
18%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
81%
65
9
56%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 133
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
131
96%
65
116
85%
85
22
16%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
97%
65
60
87%
85
14
20%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
94%
65
56
82%
85
8
12%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 136
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
95%
65
36
84%
85
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
90
96%
65
80
85%
85
21
22%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
131
96%
65
116
85%
85
22
16%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
77
77
0
0
1
3
0
73
0
77
37
40
77
0
18
59
0
77
55
77
100%
77
100%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
77
100%
37
100%
40
100%
77
100%
0
0%
18
100%
59
100%
0
0%
77
100%
65
74
96%
74
96%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
74
96%
35
95%
39
98%
74
96%
0
0%
16
89%
58
98%
0
0%
74
96%
85
21
27%
21
27%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
21
27%
10
27%
11
28%
21
27%
0
0%
1
6%
20
34%
0
0%
21
27%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
100%
65
74
96%
85
21
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
100%
65
74
96%
85
21
27%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 73
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
100%
65
74
96%
85
21
27%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
35
95%
85
10
27%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
39
98%
85
11
28%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
100%
65
74
96%
85
21
27%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
16
89%
85
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
100%
65
58
98%
85
20
34%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
100%
65
74
96%
85
21
27%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
43
43
0
0
0
0
0
43
0
24
19
43
0
5
38
0
43
55
42
98%
42
98%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
42
98%
0
0%
23
96%
19
100%
42
98%
0
0%
5
100%
37
97%
0
0%
42
98%
65
37
86%
37
86%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
37
86%
0
0%
19
79%
18
95%
37
86%
0
0%
4
80%
33
87%
0
0%
37
86%
85
14
33%
14
33%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
14
33%
0
0%
8
33%
6
32%
14
33%
0
0%
1
20%
13
34%
0
0%
14
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
37
86%
85
14
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
37
86%
85
14
33%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
37
86%
85
14
33%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
96%
65
19
79%
85
8
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
18
95%
85
6
32%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
37
86%
85
14
33%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
33
87%
85
13
34%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
37
86%
85
14
33%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
119
13
0
1
4
0
126
1
6
59
73
132
0
48
84
0
132
55
121
92%
111
93%
10
77%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
116
92%
_
_
5
83%
55
93%
66
90%
121
92%
0
0%
43
90%
78
93%
0
0%
121
92%
65
103
78%
100
84%
3
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
100
79%
_
_
3
50%
48
81%
55
75%
103
78%
0
0%
30
63%
73
87%
0
0%
103
78%
85
47
36%
46
39%
1
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
46
37%
_
_
1
17%
27
46%
20
27%
47
36%
0
0%
8
17%
39
46%
0
0%
47
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
92%
65
103
78%
85
47
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
111
93%
65
100
84%
85
46
39%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
77%
65
3
23%
85
1
8%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
116
92%
65
100
79%
85
46
37%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
3
50%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
93%
65
48
81%
85
27
46%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 73
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
90%
65
55
75%
85
20
27%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
92%
65
103
78%
85
47
36%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
90%
65
30
63%
85
8
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
78
93%
65
73
87%
85
39
46%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
92%
65
103
78%
85
47
36%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
110
96
14
0
0
3
0
107
0
110
55
55
110
0
26
84
0
110
55
103
94%
94
98%
9
64%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
103
94%
52
95%
51
93%
103
94%
0
0%
22
85%
81
96%
0
0%
103
94%
65
95
86%
91
95%
4
29%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
95
86%
47
85%
48
87%
95
86%
0
0%
17
65%
78
93%
0
0%
95
86%
85
53
48%
52
54%
1
7%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
53
48%
27
49%
26
47%
53
48%
0
0%
5
19%
48
57%
0
0%
53
48%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
94%
65
95
86%
85
53
48%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
94
98%
65
91
95%
85
52
54%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
64%
65
4
29%
85
1
7%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
94%
65
95
86%
85
53
48%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
95%
65
47
85%
85
27
49%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
93%
65
48
87%
85
26
47%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
94%
65
95
86%
85
53
48%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
85%
65
17
65%
85
5
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
81
96%
65
78
93%
85
48
57%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
94%
65
95
86%
85
53
48%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
113
107
6
0
0
1
0
111
1
113
54
59
113
0
32
81
0
113
55
113
100%
107
100%
6
100%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
113
100%
54
100%
59
100%
113
100%
0
0%
32
100%
81
100%
0
0%
113
100%
65
102
90%
98
92%
4
67%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
102
90%
49
91%
53
90%
102
90%
0
0%
29
91%
73
90%
0
0%
102
90%
85
44
39%
44
41%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
44
39%
16
30%
28
47%
44
39%
0
0%
7
22%
37
46%
0
0%
44
39%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
100%
65
102
90%
85
44
39%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
100%
65
98
92%
85
44
41%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
100%
65
102
90%
85
44
39%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
100%
65
49
91%
85
16
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
100%
65
53
90%
85
28
47%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
100%
65
102
90%
85
44
39%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
29
91%
85
7
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
81
100%
65
73
90%
85
37
46%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
100%
65
102
90%
85
44
39%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
100
91
9
0
1
0
0
99
0
100
48
52
100
0
38
62
0
100
55
95
95%
88
97%
7
78%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
95
95%
46
96%
49
94%
95
95%
0
0%
37
97%
58
94%
0
0%
95
95%
65
84
84%
80
88%
4
44%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
84
84%
41
85%
43
83%
84
84%
0
0%
32
84%
52
84%
0
0%
84
84%
85
48
48%
48
53%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
48
48%
24
50%
24
46%
48
48%
0
0%
12
32%
36
58%
0
0%
48
48%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
95
95%
65
84
84%
85
48
48%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
97%
65
80
88%
85
48
53%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
4
44%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 99
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
95
95%
65
84
84%
85
48
48%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
96%
65
41
85%
85
24
50%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
94%
65
43
83%
85
24
46%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
95
95%
65
84
84%
85
48
48%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
32
84%
85
12
32%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
94%
65
52
84%
85
36
58%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
95
95%
65
84
84%
85
48
48%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
50
50
0
0
1
2
0
47
0
50
31
19
50
0
11
39
0
50
55
49
98%
49
98%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
49
98%
31
100%
18
95%
49
98%
0
0%
10
91%
39
100%
0
0%
49
98%
65
37
74%
37
74%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
37
74%
20
65%
17
89%
37
74%
0
0%
5
45%
32
82%
0
0%
37
74%
85
10
20%
10
20%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
10
20%
5
16%
5
26%
10
20%
0
0%
0
0%
10
26%
0
0%
10
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
98%
65
37
74%
85
10
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
98%
65
37
74%
85
10
20%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
98%
65
37
74%
85
10
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
20
65%
85
5
16%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
95%
65
17
89%
85
5
26%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
98%
65
37
74%
85
10
20%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
5
45%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
32
82%
85
10
26%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
98%
65
37
74%
85
10
20%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
33
33
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
14
19
33
0
5
28
0
33
55
31
94%
31
94%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
31
94%
0
0%
14
100%
17
89%
31
94%
0
0%
4
80%
27
96%
0
0%
31
94%
65
30
91%
30
91%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
30
91%
0
0%
13
93%
17
89%
30
91%
0
0%
4
80%
26
93%
0
0%
30
91%
85
9
27%
9
27%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
9
27%
0
0%
4
29%
5
26%
9
27%
0
0%
1
20%
8
29%
0
0%
9
27%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
30
91%
85
9
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
30
91%
85
9
27%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
30
91%
85
9
27%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
13
93%
85
4
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
89%
65
17
89%
85
5
26%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
30
91%
85
9
27%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
26
93%
85
8
29%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
30
91%
85
9
27%
Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
Reading
2
_
Writing
2
_
Global Studies
3
_
US Hist & Gov't
7
43%
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
0%
2
_
2
_
3
_
7
43%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
_
2
_
3
_
7
43%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
_
2
_
3
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
3
_
2
_
2
_
3
_
4
_
2
_
2
_
3
_
7
43%
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
0%
2
_
2
_
2
_
5
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
2
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
0%
2
_
2
_
3
_
7
43%
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
43%
General Education
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
43%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Black or African American
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Hispanic or Latino
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
White
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
43%
Multiracial
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Small Group Total
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Female
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Male
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
43%
English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Not Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
7
Percent Passing
43%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
100%
100%
100%
100%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
5
5
5
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
5
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
5
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
5
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
5
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2012 - 13)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
687
1
11
8
2
662
3
139
1
330
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
99%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
663
1
11
6
2
641
2
139✝
1
322
PI
97
―
―
―
―
97
―
40✝
―
74
EAMO
78
―
―
―
―
101
―
26
―
60
Safe Harbor Target
78
―
―
―
―
101
―
26
―
60
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
687
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
663
PI
97
EAMO
78
Safe Harbor Target
78
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
662
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
641
PI
97
EAMO
101
Safe Harbor Target
101
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
139
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
139✝
PI
40✝
EAMO
26
Safe Harbor Target
26
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
330
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
322
PI
74
EAMO
60
Safe Harbor Target
60
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
686
676
679
685
25
684
548
686
357
355
332
0
687
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
99%
99%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
662
652
657
661
22
661
531
662
341
343
320
0
663
PI
97
98
96
96
―
97
111
97
118
90
104
―
97
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
686
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
662
PI
97
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
676
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
652
PI
98
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
679
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
657
PI
96
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
685
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
661
PI
96
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
684
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
661
PI
97
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
548
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
531
PI
111
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
686
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
662
PI
97
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
357
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
341
PI
118
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
355
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
343
PI
90
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
332
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
320
PI
104
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
687
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
663
PI
97
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
687
1
11
8
2
662
3
139
1
330
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
100%
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
660
1
11
6
2
638
2
139✝
1
321
PI
93
―
―
―
―
93
―
47✝
―
70
EAMO
75
―
―
―
―
95
―
28
―
56
Safe Harbor Target
75
―
―
―
―
95
―
28
―
56
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
687
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
660
PI
93
EAMO
75
Safe Harbor Target
75
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
662
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
638
PI
93
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
95
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
139
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
139✝
PI
47✝
EAMO
28
Safe Harbor Target
28
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
330
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
321
PI
70
EAMO
56
Safe Harbor Target
56
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
686
676
679
685
25
684
548
686
357
355
332
0
687
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
100%
―
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
659
649
654
658
22
658
528
659
339
341
319
0
660
PI
93
93
93
93
―
93
105
93
115
92
95
―
93
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
686
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
659
PI
93
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
676
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
649
PI
93
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
679
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
654
PI
93
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
685
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
658
PI
93
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
684
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
658
PI
93
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
548
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
528
PI
105
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
686
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
659
PI
93
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
357
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
339
PI
115
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
355
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
341
PI
92
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
332
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
319
PI
95
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
687
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
660
PI
93
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
0
3
2
1
224
1
46
0
105
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
98%
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
0
3
2
1
218
1
48✝
0
103
PI
192
―
―
―
―
192
―
165✝
―
190
EAMO
174
―
―
―
―
184
―
144
―
161
Progress Target
174
―
―
―
―
184
―
144
―
161
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
PI
192
EAMO
174
Progress Target
174
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
224
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
218
PI
192
EAMO
184
Progress Target
184
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
46
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48✝
PI
165✝
EAMO
144
Progress Target
144
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
105
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
103
PI
190
EAMO
161
Progress Target
161
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
228
229
230
7
230
185
231
126
115
116
0
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
―
98%
98%
98%
98%
97%
100%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
222
223
224
7
224
180
225
122
110
115
0
225
PI
192
192
191
192
―
192
199
192
193
191
192
―
192
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
PI
192
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
228
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
222
PI
192
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
223
PI
191
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
230
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
224
PI
192
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
230
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
224
PI
192
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
185
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
180
PI
199
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
PI
192
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
126
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
122
PI
193
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
115
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
110
PI
191
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
116
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
115
PI
192
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
PI
192
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
128
0
1
1
2
124
0
13
0
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
0
1
2
2
119
0
16
1
37
PI
155
―
―
―
―
155
―
―
―
130
EAMO
154
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
130
Safe Harbor Target
154
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
130
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
155
EAMO
154
Safe Harbor Target
154
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
119
PI
155
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
165
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
130
EAMO
130
Safe Harbor Target
130
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
128
127
127
126
4
128
115
128
90
73
55
0
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
―
98%
100%
98%
98%
97%
100%
―
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
123
122
122
5
124
108
123
87
68
56
0
124
PI
155
154
156
154
―
155
169
156
166
149
163
―
155
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
155
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
127
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
154
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
127
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
122
PI
156
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
126
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
122
PI
154
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
155
General Education
12th Graders
115
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
108
PI
169
English Proficient
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
156
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
87
PI
166
Male
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
68
PI
149
Female
12th Graders
55
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
56
PI
163
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
155
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
128
0
1
1
2
124
0
13
0
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
0
1
2
2
119
0
16
1
37
PI
144
―
―
―
―
144
―
―
―
122
EAMO
133
―
―
―
―
148
―
―
―
107
Safe Harbor Target
133
―
―
―
―
145
―
―
―
107
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
144
EAMO
133
Safe Harbor Target
133
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
119
PI
144
EAMO
148
Safe Harbor Target
145
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
122
EAMO
107
Safe Harbor Target
107
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
128
127
127
126
4
128
115
128
90
73
55
0
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
99%
100%
―
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
123
122
122
5
124
108
123
87
68
56
0
124
PI
144
144
144
143
―
144
160
143
153
134
155
―
144
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
144
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
127
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
144
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
127
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
122
PI
144
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
126
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
122
PI
143
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
144
General Education
12th Graders
115
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
108
PI
160
English Proficient
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
143
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
87
PI
153
Male
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
68
PI
134
Female
12th Graders
55
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
56
PI
155
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
144
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
97
―
―
―
―
97
―
40
―
74
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
93
―
―
―
―
93
―
47
―
70
Secondary-Level ELA PI
155
―
―
―
―
155
―
―
―
130
Secondary-Level MATH PI
144
―
―
―
―
144
―
―
―
122
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
122
0
0
0
0
122
0
44
0
99
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
97
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
93
Secondary-Level ELA PI
155
Secondary-Level MATH PI
144
Unweighted Combined PI
122
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
97
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
93
Secondary-Level ELA PI
155
Secondary-Level MATH PI
144
Unweighted Combined PI
122
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
40
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
47
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
44
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
74
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
70
Secondary-Level ELA PI
130
Secondary-Level MATH PI
122
Unweighted Combined PI
99
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
NO
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
0
3
1
0
167
0
39✝
0
63
Graduation Rate
76%
―
―
―
―
75%
―
49%✝
―
65%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
50%
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
76%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
167
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39✝
Graduation Rate
49%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
50%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
63
Graduation Rate
65%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
0
3
0
1
138
0
16
0
47
Graduation Rate
85%
―
―
―
―
86%
―
―
―
83%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
47
Graduation Rate
83%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
168
170
171
4
171
138
171
108
101
70
0
171
Graduation Rate
76%
76%
76%
76%
―
76%
83%
76%
82%
70%
84%
―
76%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
139
142
141
4
142
126
142
95
70
72
0
142
Graduation Rate
85%
86%
85%
85%
―
85%
90%
85%
86%
87%
83%
―
85%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
76%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
168
Graduation Rate
76%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
170
Graduation Rate
76%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
76%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
76%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
83%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
76%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
108
Graduation Rate
82%
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
101
Graduation Rate
70%
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
84%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
76%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
Graduation Rate
86%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
141
Graduation Rate
85%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
85%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
126
Graduation Rate
90%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
95
Graduation Rate
86%
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
87%
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
83%
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
85%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
37%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
37%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
8%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
