DUANESBURG CSD - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
25%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
19%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
25%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
19%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS
68
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
3%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
22%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
203
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
283
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 68
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
3%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
22%
Total Number of Core Classes
203
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
283
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
72
64
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
70
64
6
REGENTS DIPLOMA
68
97%
63
98%
5
83%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
28
40%
28
44%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
3%
1
2%
1
17%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
3%
0
0%
2
25%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
72
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
70
Regents Diploma
68
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
28
40%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
64
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
64
Regents Diploma
63
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
28
44%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
6
Regents Diploma
5
83%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
17%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
25%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
72
64
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
70
64
6
REGENTS DIPLOMA
68
97%
63
98%
5
83%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
28
40%
28
44%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
3%
1
2%
1
17%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
3%
0
0%
2
25%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
72
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
70
Regents Diploma
68
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
28
40%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
64
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
64
Regents Diploma
63
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
28
44%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
6
Regents Diploma
5
83%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
17%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
25%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
72
64
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
70
64
6
REGENTS DIPLOMA
68
97%
63
98%
5
83%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
28
40%
28
44%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
3%
1
2%
1
17%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
3%
0
0%
2
25%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
72
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
70
Regents Diploma
68
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
28
40%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
64
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
64
Regents Diploma
63
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
28
44%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
8
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
6
Regents Diploma
5
83%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
17%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
25%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
4
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
4
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
4
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
4
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
4
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
4
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
39%
28
44%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
32
44%
26
41%
6
75%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
6%
4
6%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
4
6%
4
6%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
3%
0
0%
2
25%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
39%
To Two-Year College
32
44%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
6%
To Employment
4
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
3%
Plan Unknown
2
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
28
44%
To Two-Year College
26
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
6%
To Employment
4
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
3%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
6
75%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
39%
28
44%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
32
44%
26
41%
6
75%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
6%
4
6%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
4
6%
4
6%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
3%
0
0%
2
25%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
39%
To Two-Year College
32
44%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
6%
To Employment
4
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
3%
Plan Unknown
2
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
28
44%
To Two-Year College
26
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
6%
To Employment
4
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
3%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
6
75%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
39%
28
44%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
32
44%
26
41%
6
75%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
6%
4
6%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
4
6%
4
6%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
3%
0
0%
2
25%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
39%
To Two-Year College
32
44%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
6%
To Employment
4
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
3%
Plan Unknown
2
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
28
44%
To Two-Year College
26
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
6%
To Employment
4
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
3%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
6
75%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
25%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
24
35%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
18
29%
LEVEL 2
22
35%
LEVEL 3
20
32%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
24
35%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
11
37%
LEVEL 3
10
33%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Male
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
17
45%
LEVEL 2
11
29%
LEVEL 3
10
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
24
35%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
10
67%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
14
26%
LEVEL 2
18
34%
LEVEL 3
20
38%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
24
35%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
62
6
1
1
2
64
68
30
38
68
15
53
68
PROFICIENT
32%
35%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
32%
40%
26%
32%
7%
40%
32%
LEVEL 1
24
35%
18
29%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
35%
7
23%
17
45%
24
35%
10
67%
14
26%
24
35%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
22
35%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
32%
11
37%
11
29%
22
32%
4
27%
18
34%
22
32%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
20
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
29%
10
33%
10
26%
20
29%
0
0%
20
38%
20
29%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3%
2
7%
0
0%
2
3%
1
7%
1
2%
2
3%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 315
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
22
38%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
LEVEL 4
15
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
22
42%
LEVEL 3
12
23%
LEVEL 4
15
29%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
6
11%
LEVEL 2
22
42%
LEVEL 3
11
21%
LEVEL 4
14
26%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
7
25%
LEVEL 3
7
25%
LEVEL 4
11
39%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
6
20%
LEVEL 2
15
50%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
9
60%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
13
30%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
13
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
22
38%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
LEVEL 4
15
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
58
52
6
1
4
53
5
28
30
57
1
15
43
58
PROFICIENT
47%
52%
0%
_%
_%
47%
40%
64%
30%
_%
_%
27%
53%
47%
LEVEL 1
9
16%
3
6%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
11%
3
60%
3
11%
6
20%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
7
16%
9
16%
LEVEL 2
22
38%
22
42%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
22
42%
0
0%
7
25%
15
50%
_
_
_
_
9
60%
13
30%
22
38%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
12
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
11
21%
1
20%
7
25%
5
17%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
10
23%
12
21%
LEVEL 4
15
26%
15
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
14
26%
1
20%
11
39%
4
13%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
13
30%
15
26%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
20
36%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
20
36%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
13
36%
LEVEL 2
14
39%
LEVEL 3
8
22%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
20
36%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
6
55%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
14
31%
LEVEL 2
18
40%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
20
36%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
56
53
3
1
2
1
52
56
20
36
56
11
45
56
PROFICIENT
25%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
25%
25%
25%
25%
9%
29%
25%
LEVEL 1
20
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
36%
7
35%
13
36%
20
36%
6
55%
14
31%
20
36%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
39%
8
40%
14
39%
22
39%
4
36%
18
40%
22
39%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
23%
5
25%
8
22%
13
23%
1
9%
12
27%
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
9
12%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
28
47%
LEVEL 3
9
15%
LEVEL 4
11
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
10
77%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
9
12%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
7
21%
LEVEL 2
15
44%
LEVEL 3
4
12%
LEVEL 4
8
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
15
38%
LEVEL 2
15
38%
LEVEL 3
5
13%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
9
12%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
8
47%
LEVEL 2
6
35%
LEVEL 3
3
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
14
25%
LEVEL 2
24
43%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
12
21%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
9
12%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
73
60
13
1
3
69
73
34
39
73
17
56
73
PROFICIENT
29%
33%
8%
_%
_%
_%
29%
35%
23%
29%
18%
32%
29%
LEVEL 1
22
30%
12
20%
10
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
30%
7
21%
15
38%
22
30%
8
47%
14
25%
22
30%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
28
47%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
41%
15
44%
15
38%
30
41%
6
35%
24
43%
30
41%
LEVEL 3
9
12%
9
15%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
12%
4
12%
5
13%
9
12%
3
18%
6
11%
9
12%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
11
18%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
16%
8
24%
4
10%
12
16%
0
0%
12
21%
12
16%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
16
26%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
16
26%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
5
16%
LEVEL 2
17
55%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
8
27%
LEVEL 3
12
40%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
16
26%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
22
45%
LEVEL 3
13
27%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
16
26%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
57
4
1
1
58
1
61
31
30
61
12
49
61
PROFICIENT
39%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
39%
29%
50%
39%
42%
39%
39%
LEVEL 1
12
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
20%
5
16%
7
23%
12
20%
4
33%
8
16%
12
20%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
41%
17
55%
8
27%
25
41%
3
25%
22
45%
25
41%
LEVEL 3
16
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
26%
4
13%
12
40%
16
26%
3
25%
13
27%
16
26%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
13%
5
16%
3
10%
8
13%
2
17%
6
12%
8
13%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
9
12%
LEVEL 2
33
45%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
29
45%
LEVEL 3
20
31%
LEVEL 4
11
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
9
12%
LEVEL 2
33
45%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
15
45%
LEVEL 3
9
27%
LEVEL 4
7
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
7
17%
LEVEL 2
18
44%
LEVEL 3
12
29%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
9
12%
LEVEL 2
33
45%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
9
69%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
24
39%
LEVEL 3
19
31%
LEVEL 4
11
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
9
12%
LEVEL 2
33
45%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
74
64
10
2
72
74
33
41
74
13
61
74
PROFICIENT
43%
48%
10%
_%
_%
43%
48%
39%
43%
15%
49%
43%
LEVEL 1
9
12%
4
6%
5
50%
_
_
_
_
9
12%
2
6%
7
17%
9
12%
2
15%
7
11%
9
12%
LEVEL 2
33
45%
29
45%
4
40%
_
_
_
_
33
45%
15
45%
18
44%
33
45%
9
69%
24
39%
33
45%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
20
31%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
21
28%
9
27%
12
29%
21
28%
2
15%
19
31%
21
28%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
11
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
11
15%
7
21%
4
10%
11
15%
0
0%
11
18%
11
15%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
27
40%
LEVEL 2
26
38%
LEVEL 3
10
15%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
22
35%
LEVEL 2
25
40%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
5
83%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
27
40%
LEVEL 2
26
38%
LEVEL 3
10
15%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
10
33%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
17
45%
LEVEL 2
14
37%
LEVEL 3
6
16%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
27
40%
LEVEL 2
26
38%
LEVEL 3
10
15%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
12
80%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
15
28%
LEVEL 2
23
43%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
27
40%
LEVEL 2
26
38%
LEVEL 3
10
15%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
62
6
1
1
2
64
68
30
38
68
15
53
68
PROFICIENT
22%
24%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
22%
27%
18%
22%
0%
28%
22%
LEVEL 1
27
40%
22
35%
5
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
40%
10
33%
17
45%
27
40%
12
80%
15
28%
27
40%
LEVEL 2
26
38%
25
40%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
38%
12
40%
14
37%
26
38%
3
20%
23
43%
26
38%
LEVEL 3
10
15%
10
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
15%
4
13%
6
16%
10
15%
0
0%
10
19%
10
15%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
5
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
7%
4
13%
1
3%
5
7%
0
0%
5
9%
5
7%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
10
17%
LEVEL 2
20
34%
LEVEL 3
22
38%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
22
42%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
8
15%
LEVEL 2
19
36%
LEVEL 3
20
38%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
9
32%
LEVEL 3
13
46%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
11
37%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
18
42%
LEVEL 4
5
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
10
17%
LEVEL 2
20
34%
LEVEL 3
22
38%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
58
52
6
1
4
53
5
28
30
57
1
15
43
58
PROFICIENT
48%
54%
0%
_%
_%
49%
40%
61%
37%
_%
_%
33%
53%
48%
LEVEL 1
10
17%
4
8%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
8
15%
2
40%
2
7%
8
27%
_
_
_
_
4
27%
6
14%
10
17%
LEVEL 2
20
34%
20
38%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
19
36%
1
20%
9
32%
11
37%
_
_
_
_
6
40%
14
33%
20
34%
LEVEL 3
22
38%
22
42%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
20
38%
2
40%
13
46%
9
30%
_
_
_
_
4
27%
18
42%
22
38%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
6
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
11%
0
0%
4
14%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
5
12%
6
10%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 298
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
25
45%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
25
45%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
14
70%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
11
31%
LEVEL 2
13
36%
LEVEL 3
11
31%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
25
45%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
6
55%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
19
42%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
LEVEL 3
13
29%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
25
45%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
56
53
3
1
2
1
52
56
20
36
56
11
45
56
PROFICIENT
25%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
25%
10%
33%
25%
0%
31%
25%
LEVEL 1
25
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
45%
14
70%
11
31%
25
45%
6
55%
19
42%
25
45%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
30%
4
20%
13
36%
17
30%
5
45%
12
27%
17
30%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
23%
2
10%
11
31%
13
23%
0
0%
13
29%
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 290
All Students
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
30
41%
LEVEL 2
35
48%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
20
33%
LEVEL 2
33
55%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
10
77%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
30
41%
LEVEL 2
35
48%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Female
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
12
35%
LEVEL 2
18
53%
LEVEL 3
4
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
18
46%
LEVEL 2
17
44%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
30
41%
LEVEL 2
35
48%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
11
65%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
19
34%
LEVEL 2
30
54%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
30
41%
LEVEL 2
35
48%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
73
60
13
1
3
69
73
34
39
73
17
56
73
PROFICIENT
11%
12%
8%
_%
_%
_%
11%
12%
10%
11%
6%
13%
11%
LEVEL 1
30
41%
20
33%
10
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
41%
12
35%
18
46%
30
41%
11
65%
19
34%
30
41%
LEVEL 2
35
48%
33
55%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
48%
18
53%
17
44%
35
48%
5
29%
30
54%
35
48%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
7
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
10%
4
12%
3
8%
7
10%
1
6%
6
11%
7
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
15
25%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
15
25%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
9
29%
LEVEL 2
17
55%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
6
20%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
15
25%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
5
42%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
11
22%
LEVEL 2
24
49%
LEVEL 3
10
20%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
15
25%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
57
4
1
1
58
1
61
31
30
61
12
49
61
PROFICIENT
28%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
28%
16%
40%
28%
25%
29%
28%
LEVEL 1
15
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
25%
9
29%
6
20%
15
25%
4
33%
11
22%
15
25%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
48%
17
55%
12
40%
29
48%
5
42%
24
49%
29
48%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
20%
4
13%
8
27%
12
20%
2
17%
10
20%
12
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
8%
1
3%
4
13%
5
8%
1
8%
4
8%
5
8%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 316
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
34
46%
LEVEL 3
24
32%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
30
47%
LEVEL 3
22
34%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
34
46%
LEVEL 3
24
32%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
17
52%
LEVEL 3
11
33%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
17
41%
LEVEL 3
13
32%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
34
46%
LEVEL 3
24
32%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
8
62%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
26
43%
LEVEL 3
22
36%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
34
46%
LEVEL 3
24
32%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
74
64
10
2
72
74
33
41
74
13
61
74
PROFICIENT
43%
47%
20%
_%
_%
43%
39%
46%
43%
23%
48%
43%
LEVEL 1
8
11%
4
6%
4
40%
_
_
_
_
8
11%
3
9%
5
12%
8
11%
2
15%
6
10%
8
11%
LEVEL 2
34
46%
30
47%
4
40%
_
_
_
_
34
46%
17
52%
17
41%
34
46%
8
62%
26
43%
34
46%
LEVEL 3
24
32%
22
34%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
24
32%
11
33%
13
32%
24
32%
2
15%
22
36%
24
32%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
8
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
11%
2
6%
6
15%
8
11%
1
8%
7
11%
8
11%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 89
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
47
81%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
12%
LEVEL 4
46
88%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
7
13%
LEVEL 4
44
83%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
25
89%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
6
20%
LEVEL 4
22
73%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
11
73%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
36
84%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
47
81%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
58
52
6
1
4
53
5
28
30
57
1
15
43
58
PROFICIENT
95%
100%
50%
_%
_%
96%
80%
96%
93%
_%
_%
100%
93%
95%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
20%
0
0%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
5%
2
3%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
6
12%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
7
13%
1
20%
2
7%
6
20%
_
_
_
_
4
27%
4
9%
8
14%
LEVEL 4
47
81%
46
88%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
44
83%
3
60%
25
89%
22
73%
_
_
_
_
11
73%
36
84%
47
81%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 79
All Students
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
11%
LEVEL 3
36
49%
LEVEL 4
28
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
34
53%
LEVEL 4
26
41%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
11%
LEVEL 3
36
49%
LEVEL 4
28
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
19
58%
LEVEL 4
11
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
15%
LEVEL 3
17
43%
LEVEL 4
17
43%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
11%
LEVEL 3
36
49%
LEVEL 4
28
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
8
67%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
28
46%
LEVEL 4
26
43%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
11%
LEVEL 3
36
49%
LEVEL 4
28
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
73
64
9
2
71
73
33
40
73
12
61
73
PROFICIENT
88%
94%
44%
_%
_%
88%
91%
85%
88%
83%
89%
88%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
3%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
11%
4
6%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
8
11%
2
6%
6
15%
8
11%
2
17%
6
10%
8
11%
LEVEL 3
36
49%
34
53%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
36
49%
19
58%
17
43%
36
49%
8
67%
28
46%
36
49%
LEVEL 4
28
38%
26
41%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
28
38%
11
33%
17
43%
28
38%
2
17%
26
43%
28
38%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
28
37%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
36%
LEVEL 4
43
62%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
28
37%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
31%
LEVEL 4
25
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
16
43%
LEVEL 4
19
51%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
63%
LEVEL 4
6
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
18
30%
LEVEL 4
38
63%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
28
37%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
69
7
1
75
76
39
37
75
1
16
60
76
PROFICIENT
95%
99%
57%
_%
_%
95%
95%
95%
_%
_%
100%
93%
95%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
0
0%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
0
0%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
2
3%
LEVEL 3
28
37%
25
36%
3
43%
_
_
_
_
28
37%
12
31%
16
43%
_
_
_
_
10
63%
18
30%
28
37%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
43
62%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
44
58%
25
64%
19
51%
_
_
_
_
6
38%
38
63%
44
58%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
51
67%
LEVEL 4
19
25%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
48
70%
LEVEL 4
19
28%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
51
67%
LEVEL 4
19
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
62%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
Male
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
27
73%
LEVEL 4
9
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
88%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
37
62%
LEVEL 4
17
28%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
51
67%
LEVEL 4
19
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
69
7
1
75
76
39
37
75
1
16
60
76
PROFICIENT
92%
97%
43%
_%
_%
92%
87%
97%
_%
_%
100%
90%
92%
LEVEL 1
3
4%
1
1%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
3
4%
3
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
5%
3
4%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
1
1%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
1
3%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
2
3%
LEVEL 3
51
67%
48
70%
3
43%
_
_
_
_
51
67%
24
62%
27
73%
_
_
_
_
14
88%
37
62%
51
67%
LEVEL 4
19
25%
19
28%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
19
25%
10
26%
9
24%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
17
28%
19
25%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
46%
LEVEL 4
33
43%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
33
48%
LEVEL 4
33
48%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
46%
LEVEL 4
33
43%
Female
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
19
49%
Male
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
20
54%
LEVEL 4
14
38%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
75%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
23
38%
LEVEL 4
30
50%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
46%
LEVEL 4
33
43%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
69
7
1
75
76
39
37
75
1
16
60
76
PROFICIENT
89%
96%
29%
_%
_%
89%
87%
92%
_%
_%
94%
88%
89%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
46%
33
48%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
35
46%
15
38%
20
54%
_
_
_
_
12
75%
23
38%
35
46%
LEVEL 4
33
43%
33
48%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
33
43%
19
49%
14
38%
_
_
_
_
3
19%
30
50%
33
43%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
General Education
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
19
28%
LEVEL 4
43
62%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
12
31%
LEVEL 4
23
59%
Male
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
10
27%
LEVEL 4
21
57%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
63%
LEVEL 4
5
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
39
65%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
69
7
1
75
76
39
37
75
1
16
60
76
PROFICIENT
87%
90%
57%
_%
_%
87%
90%
84%
_%
_%
94%
85%
87%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
1
1%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
1
3%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
2
3%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
19
28%
3
43%
_
_
_
_
22
29%
12
31%
10
27%
_
_
_
_
10
63%
12
20%
22
29%
LEVEL 4
44
58%
43
62%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
44
58%
23
59%
21
57%
_
_
_
_
5
31%
39
65%
44
58%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
56
74%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
20%
LEVEL 4
55
80%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
56
74%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
18%
LEVEL 4
30
77%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
30%
LEVEL 4
26
70%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
44%
LEVEL 4
9
56%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
47
78%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
56
74%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
69
7
1
75
76
39
37
75
1
16
60
76
PROFICIENT
97%
100%
71%
_%
_%
97%
95%
100%
_%
_%
100%
97%
97%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
14
20%
4
57%
_
_
_
_
18
24%
7
18%
11
30%
_
_
_
_
7
44%
11
18%
18
24%
LEVEL 4
56
74%
55
80%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
56
74%
30
77%
26
70%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
47
78%
56
74%
Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
62
6
0
0
3
2
63
0
5
31
37
68
0
9
59
0
68
55
66
97%
61
98%
5
83%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
61
97%
0
0%
5
100%
30
97%
36
97%
66
97%
0
0%
8
89%
58
98%
0
0%
66
97%
65
64
94%
60
97%
4
67%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
59
94%
0
0%
5
100%
30
97%
34
92%
64
94%
0
0%
7
78%
57
97%
0
0%
64
94%
85
29
43%
29
47%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
26
41%
0
0%
3
60%
19
61%
10
27%
29
43%
0
0%
0
0%
29
49%
0
0%
29
43%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
97%
65
64
94%
85
29
43%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
98%
65
60
97%
85
29
47%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
97%
65
59
94%
85
26
41%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
97%
65
30
97%
85
19
61%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
97%
65
34
92%
85
10
27%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
97%
65
64
94%
85
29
43%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
7
78%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
98%
65
57
97%
85
29
49%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
97%
65
64
94%
85
29
43%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
87
76
11
0
2
0
1
84
0
87
43
44
87
0
17
70
0
87
55
83
95%
75
99%
8
73%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
83
95%
40
93%
43
98%
83
95%
0
0%
16
94%
67
96%
0
0%
83
95%
65
78
90%
74
97%
4
36%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
78
90%
37
86%
41
93%
78
90%
0
0%
14
82%
64
91%
0
0%
78
90%
85
19
22%
18
24%
1
9%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
19
22%
9
21%
10
23%
19
22%
0
0%
3
18%
16
23%
0
0%
19
22%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
78
90%
85
19
22%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
75
99%
65
74
97%
85
18
24%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
73%
65
4
36%
85
1
9%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
78
90%
85
19
22%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
93%
65
37
86%
85
9
21%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
98%
65
41
93%
85
10
23%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
78
90%
85
19
22%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
14
82%
85
3
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
96%
65
64
91%
85
16
23%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
78
90%
85
19
22%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
74
68
6
0
0
1
3
70
0
74
25
49
74
0
11
63
0
74
55
73
99%
67
99%
6
100%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
73
99%
25
100%
48
98%
73
99%
0
0%
11
100%
62
98%
0
0%
73
99%
65
62
84%
57
84%
5
83%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
62
84%
22
88%
40
82%
62
84%
0
0%
6
55%
56
89%
0
0%
62
84%
85
15
20%
15
22%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
15
20%
7
28%
8
16%
15
20%
0
0%
0
0%
15
24%
0
0%
15
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
99%
65
62
84%
85
15
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
57
84%
85
15
22%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
99%
65
62
84%
85
15
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
22
88%
85
7
28%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
98%
65
40
82%
85
8
16%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
99%
65
62
84%
85
15
20%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
6
55%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
98%
65
56
89%
85
15
24%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
99%
65
62
84%
85
15
20%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
43
43
0
0
0
2
1
40
0
43
18
25
43
0
5
38
0
43
55
23
53%
23
53%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
23
53%
8
44%
15
60%
23
53%
0
0%
2
40%
21
55%
0
0%
23
53%
65
13
30%
13
30%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
13
30%
5
28%
8
32%
13
30%
0
0%
1
20%
12
32%
0
0%
13
30%
85
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
4%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
53%
65
13
30%
85
1
2%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
53%
65
13
30%
85
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
53%
65
13
30%
85
1
2%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
44%
65
5
28%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
60%
65
8
32%
85
1
4%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
53%
65
13
30%
85
1
2%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
55%
65
12
32%
85
1
3%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
53%
65
13
30%
85
1
2%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
87
74
13
0
0
0
3
84
0
87
35
52
87
0
13
74
0
87
55
83
95%
72
97%
11
85%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
83
95%
33
94%
50
96%
83
95%
0
0%
13
100%
70
95%
0
0%
83
95%
65
71
82%
65
88%
6
46%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
71
82%
27
77%
44
85%
71
82%
0
0%
8
62%
63
85%
0
0%
71
82%
85
26
30%
24
32%
2
15%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
26
30%
10
29%
16
31%
26
30%
0
0%
1
8%
25
34%
0
0%
26
30%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
71
82%
85
26
30%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
97%
65
65
88%
85
24
32%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
85%
65
6
46%
85
2
15%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
71
82%
85
26
30%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
27
77%
85
10
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
96%
65
44
85%
85
16
31%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
71
82%
85
26
30%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
8
62%
85
1
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
95%
65
63
85%
85
25
34%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
95%
65
71
82%
85
26
30%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
62
6
0
0
4
2
62
0
6
33
35
68
0
8
60
0
68
55
66
97%
61
98%
5
83%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
60
97%
0
0%
6
100%
31
94%
35
100%
66
97%
0
0%
8
100%
58
97%
0
0%
66
97%
65
64
94%
59
95%
5
83%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
58
94%
0
0%
6
100%
31
94%
33
94%
64
94%
0
0%
8
100%
56
93%
0
0%
64
94%
85
35
51%
34
55%
1
17%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
32
52%
0
0%
3
50%
17
52%
18
51%
35
51%
0
0%
2
25%
33
55%
0
0%
35
51%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
97%
65
64
94%
85
35
51%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
98%
65
59
95%
85
34
55%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
97%
65
58
94%
85
32
52%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
3
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
31
94%
85
17
52%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
100%
65
33
94%
85
18
51%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
97%
65
64
94%
85
35
51%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
2
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
97%
65
56
93%
85
33
55%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
97%
65
64
94%
85
35
51%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
50
45
5
0
1
0
0
49
0
50
26
24
50
0
11
39
0
50
55
48
96%
44
98%
4
80%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
48
96%
24
92%
24
100%
48
96%
0
0%
10
91%
38
97%
0
0%
48
96%
65
48
96%
44
98%
4
80%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
48
96%
24
92%
24
100%
48
96%
0
0%
10
91%
38
97%
0
0%
48
96%
85
38
76%
37
82%
1
20%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
38
76%
19
73%
19
79%
38
76%
0
0%
10
91%
28
72%
0
0%
38
76%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
96%
65
48
96%
85
38
76%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
98%
65
44
98%
85
37
82%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
96%
65
48
96%
85
38
76%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
92%
65
24
92%
85
19
73%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
24
100%
85
19
79%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
96%
65
48
96%
85
38
76%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
10
91%
85
10
91%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
38
97%
85
28
72%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
96%
65
48
96%
85
38
76%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
101
90
11
0
1
0
2
98
0
101
38
63
101
0
13
88
0
101
55
100
99%
90
100%
10
91%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
100
99%
37
97%
63
100%
100
99%
0
0%
12
92%
88
100%
0
0%
100
99%
65
93
92%
87
97%
6
55%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
93
92%
32
84%
61
97%
93
92%
0
0%
11
85%
82
93%
0
0%
93
92%
85
53
52%
51
57%
2
18%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
53
52%
17
45%
36
57%
53
52%
0
0%
3
23%
50
57%
0
0%
53
52%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
99%
65
93
92%
85
53
52%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
90
100%
65
87
97%
85
51
57%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
6
55%
85
2
18%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
99%
65
93
92%
85
53
52%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
32
84%
85
17
45%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
63
100%
65
61
97%
85
36
57%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
99%
65
93
92%
85
53
52%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
11
85%
85
3
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
100%
65
82
93%
85
50
57%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
99%
65
93
92%
85
53
52%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
38
38
0
0
0
3
1
34
0
38
17
21
38
0
2
36
0
38
55
37
97%
37
97%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
37
97%
17
100%
20
95%
37
97%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
37
97%
65
28
74%
28
74%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
28
74%
11
65%
17
81%
28
74%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
28
74%
85
5
13%
5
13%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
5
13%
2
12%
3
14%
5
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
5
13%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
28
74%
85
5
13%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
28
74%
85
5
13%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
28
74%
85
5
13%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
11
65%
85
2
12%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
17
81%
85
3
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
28
74%
85
5
13%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
28
74%
85
5
13%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
28
0
0
0
0
0
28
0
19
9
28
0
3
25
0
28
55
25
89%
25
89%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
25
89%
0
0%
17
89%
8
89%
25
89%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
25
89%
65
22
79%
22
79%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
22
79%
0
0%
15
79%
7
78%
22
79%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
22
79%
85
7
25%
7
25%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
7
25%
0
0%
4
21%
3
33%
7
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
7
25%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
22
79%
85
7
25%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
22
79%
85
7
25%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
22
79%
85
7
25%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
89%
65
15
79%
85
4
21%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
7
78%
85
3
33%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
22
79%
85
7
25%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
22
79%
85
7
25%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
0
0
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
0%
0%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
0
0
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
0
0
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
0
0
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
0
0
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
0 0%
TOTAL TESTED: 0
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
0
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
0 0%
TOTAL TESTED: 0
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
0
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2012 - 13)
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
392
1
5
10
5
370
1
44
1
83
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
100%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
0
5
10
5
364
1
50✝
1
80
PI
116
―
―
―
―
117
―
52✝
―
85
EAMO
76
―
―
―
―
99
―
22
―
55
Safe Harbor Target
76
―
―
―
―
99
―
22
―
55
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
392
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
PI
116
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
76
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
370
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
PI
117
EAMO
99
Safe Harbor Target
99
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
44
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50✝
PI
52✝
EAMO
22
Safe Harbor Target
22
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
83
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
80
PI
85
EAMO
55
Safe Harbor Target
55
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
387
382
387
22
391
348
391
309
215
177
0
392
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
380
375
380
21
384
343
384
305
211
174
0
385
PI
116
117
117
116
―
116
125
116
124
107
128
―
116
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
PI
116
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
387
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
380
PI
117
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
382
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
375
PI
117
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
387
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
380
PI
116
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
116
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
348
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
343
PI
125
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
116
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
309
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
305
PI
124
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
215
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
211
PI
107
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
177
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
174
PI
128
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
392
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
PI
116
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
392
1
5
10
5
370
1
44
1
83
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
100%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
0
5
10
5
364
1
50✝
1
80
PI
102
―
―
―
―
104
―
58✝
―
69
EAMO
73
―
―
―
―
93
―
24
―
51
Safe Harbor Target
73
―
―
―
―
93
―
24
―
51
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
392
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
PI
102
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
73
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
370
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
PI
104
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
44
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50✝
PI
58✝
EAMO
24
Safe Harbor Target
24
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
83
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
80
PI
69
EAMO
51
Safe Harbor Target
51
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
387
382
387
22
391
348
391
309
215
177
0
392
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
380
375
380
21
384
343
384
305
211
174
0
385
PI
102
103
103
103
―
103
109
103
111
103
101
―
102
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
PI
102
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
387
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
380
PI
103
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
382
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
375
PI
103
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
387
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
380
PI
103
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
103
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
348
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
343
PI
109
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
391
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
103
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
309
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
305
PI
111
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
215
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
211
PI
103
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
177
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
174
PI
101
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
392
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
385
PI
102
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
0
0
4
3
124
0
15
1
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
0
0
4
3
123
0
15
1
27
PI
189
―
―
―
―
189
―
―
―
―
EAMO
172
―
―
―
―
183
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
172
―
―
―
―
183
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
EAMO
172
Progress Target
172
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
124
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
PI
189
EAMO
183
Progress Target
183
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
27
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
131
127
128
7
131
116
130
104
70
61
0
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
130
126
127
7
130
115
129
103
70
60
0
130
PI
189
189
189
190
―
189
197
190
188
189
190
―
189
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
127
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
126
PI
189
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
128
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
127
PI
190
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
116
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
115
PI
197
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
130
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
129
PI
190
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
104
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
103
PI
188
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
70
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
189
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
61
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
190
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
73
0
0
0
0
73
0
7
0
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
0
0
0
0
72
0
7
0
14
PI
179
―
―
―
―
179
―
―
―
―
EAMO
152
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
152
―
―
―
―
160
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
EAMO
152
Safe Harbor Target
152
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
EAMO
165
Safe Harbor Target
160
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
73
73
73
73
0
73
66
73
58
37
36
0
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
98%
99%
98%
―
―
―
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
72
72
72
0
72
65
72
58
37
35
0
72
PI
179
179
179
179
―
179
188
179
179
176
183
―
179
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
General Education
12th Graders
66
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
65
PI
188
English Proficient
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
58
PI
179
Male
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
176
Female
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
183
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
179
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
73
0
0
0
0
73
0
7
0
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
0
0
0
0
72
0
7
0
14
PI
146
―
―
―
―
146
―
―
―
―
EAMO
131
―
―
―
―
147
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
131
―
―
―
―
137
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
EAMO
131
Safe Harbor Target
131
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
EAMO
147
Safe Harbor Target
137
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
73
73
73
73
0
73
66
73
58
37
36
0
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
98%
―
―
―
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
72
72
72
0
72
65
72
58
37
35
0
72
PI
146
146
146
146
―
146
154
146
148
157
134
―
146
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
General Education
12th Graders
66
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
65
PI
154
English Proficient
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
58
PI
148
Male
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
157
Female
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
134
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
72
PI
146
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
116
―
―
―
―
117
―
52
―
85
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
102
―
―
―
―
104
―
58
―
69
Secondary-Level ELA PI
179
―
―
―
―
179
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
146
―
―
―
―
146
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
136
0
0
0
0
137
0
55
0
77
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
116
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
102
Secondary-Level ELA PI
179
Secondary-Level MATH PI
146
Unweighted Combined PI
136
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
117
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
104
Secondary-Level ELA PI
179
Secondary-Level MATH PI
146
Unweighted Combined PI
137
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
52
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
58
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
55
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
85
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
69
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
77
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
0
1
2
0
74
0
9
0
14
Graduation Rate
94%
―
―
―
―
95%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
74
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
9
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
0
1
0
0
76
0
8
0
8
Graduation Rate
92%
―
―
―
―
93%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
76
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
76
75
77
3
77
68
77
63
31
46
0
77
Graduation Rate
94%
95%
93%
94%
―
94%
96%
94%
94%
90%
96%
―
94%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
76
77
77
1
77
69
77
69
37
40
0
77
Graduation Rate
92%
93%
92%
92%
―
92%
97%
92%
93%
92%
93%
―
92%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
76
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
75
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
94%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
94%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
68
Graduation Rate
96%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
63
Graduation Rate
94%
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
Graduation Rate
96%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
94%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
76
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
92%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
93%
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
92%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
26%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
26%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
