SCHODACK CSD - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
14%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
20%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
14%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
20%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS
82
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
4%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
11%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
266
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
359
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 82
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
4%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
11%
Total Number of Core Classes
266
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
359
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
High School Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
104
89
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
100
89
11
REGENTS DIPLOMA
95
95%
88
99%
7
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
43
43%
43
48%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
6%
4
4%
2
18%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
5%
1
1%
4
36%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
4
4%
0
0%
4
27%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
104
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
100
Regents Diploma
95
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
43
43%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
6%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
4
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
89
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
89
Regents Diploma
88
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
43
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
11
Regents Diploma
7
64%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
18%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
36%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
4
27%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
104
89
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
100
89
11
REGENTS DIPLOMA
95
95%
88
99%
7
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
43
43%
43
48%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
6%
4
4%
2
18%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
5%
1
1%
4
36%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
4
4%
0
0%
4
27%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
104
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
100
Regents Diploma
95
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
43
43%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
6%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
4
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
89
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
89
Regents Diploma
88
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
43
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
11
Regents Diploma
7
64%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
18%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
36%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
4
27%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
104
89
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
100
89
11
REGENTS DIPLOMA
95
95%
88
99%
7
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
43
43%
43
48%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
6%
4
4%
2
18%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
5%
1
1%
4
36%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
4
4%
0
0%
4
27%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
104
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
100
Regents Diploma
95
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
43
43%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
6%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
4
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
89
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
89
Regents Diploma
88
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
43
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
11
Regents Diploma
7
64%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
18%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
36%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
4
27%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
53
51%
53
60%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
38%
30
34%
9
60%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
5
5%
3
3%
2
13%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
2%
0
0%
2
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
3
3%
2
2%
1
7%
All Students
To Four-Year College
53
51%
To Two-Year College
39
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
5
5%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
3
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
53
60%
To Two-Year College
30
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
2%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
9
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
13%
To Adult Services
1
7%
To Other Known Plans
2
13%
Plan Unknown
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
53
51%
53
60%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
38%
30
34%
9
60%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
5
5%
3
3%
2
13%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
2%
0
0%
2
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
3
3%
2
2%
1
7%
All Students
To Four-Year College
53
51%
To Two-Year College
39
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
5
5%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
3
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
53
60%
To Two-Year College
30
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
2%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
9
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
13%
To Adult Services
1
7%
To Other Known Plans
2
13%
Plan Unknown
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
53
51%
53
60%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
38%
30
34%
9
60%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
5
5%
3
3%
2
13%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
2%
0
0%
2
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
3
3%
2
2%
1
7%
All Students
To Four-Year College
53
51%
To Two-Year College
39
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
5
5%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
2
2%
Plan Unknown
3
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
53
60%
To Two-Year College
30
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
2%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
9
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
13%
To Adult Services
1
7%
To Other Known Plans
2
13%
Plan Unknown
1
7%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 312
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
17
25%
LEVEL 2
21
30%
LEVEL 3
28
41%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
11
18%
LEVEL 2
19
31%
LEVEL 3
28
46%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
17
25%
LEVEL 2
21
30%
LEVEL 3
28
41%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
8
28%
LEVEL 2
8
28%
LEVEL 3
12
41%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
9
23%
LEVEL 2
13
33%
LEVEL 3
16
40%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
17
25%
LEVEL 2
21
30%
LEVEL 3
28
41%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
15
25%
LEVEL 2
16
26%
LEVEL 3
28
46%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
17
25%
LEVEL 2
21
30%
LEVEL 3
28
41%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
61
8
1
1
65
2
69
29
40
69
8
61
69
PROFICIENT
45%
51%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
45%
45%
45%
45%
13%
49%
45%
LEVEL 1
17
25%
11
18%
6
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
25%
8
28%
9
23%
17
25%
2
25%
15
25%
17
25%
LEVEL 2
21
30%
19
31%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
30%
8
28%
13
33%
21
30%
5
63%
16
26%
21
30%
LEVEL 3
28
41%
28
46%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
41%
12
41%
16
40%
28
41%
0
0%
28
46%
28
41%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
3
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
4%
1
3%
2
5%
3
4%
1
13%
2
3%
3
4%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
19
25%
LEVEL 2
34
45%
LEVEL 3
16
21%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
31
52%
LEVEL 3
15
25%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
11
73%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
33
49%
LEVEL 3
16
24%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
5
71%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
18
56%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
13
30%
LEVEL 2
16
37%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
19
25%
LEVEL 2
34
45%
LEVEL 3
16
21%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
6
55%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
28
44%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
19
25%
LEVEL 2
34
45%
LEVEL 3
16
21%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
60
15
1
4
2
68
7
32
43
75
11
64
75
PROFICIENT
29%
35%
7%
_%
_%
_%
31%
14%
25%
33%
29%
0%
34%
29%
LEVEL 1
19
25%
8
13%
11
73%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
21%
5
71%
6
19%
13
30%
19
25%
5
45%
14
22%
19
25%
LEVEL 2
34
45%
31
52%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
49%
1
14%
18
56%
16
37%
34
45%
6
55%
28
44%
34
45%
LEVEL 3
16
21%
15
25%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
24%
0
0%
6
19%
10
23%
16
21%
0
0%
16
25%
16
21%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
6
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
7%
1
14%
2
6%
4
9%
6
8%
0
0%
6
9%
6
8%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
40
51%
LEVEL 3
18
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
37
56%
LEVEL 3
17
26%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
8
67%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
40
51%
LEVEL 3
18
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
20
57%
LEVEL 3
9
26%
LEVEL 4
5
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
14
33%
LEVEL 2
20
47%
LEVEL 3
9
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
40
51%
LEVEL 3
18
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
36
53%
LEVEL 3
16
24%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
40
51%
LEVEL 3
18
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
78
66
12
1
2
75
78
35
43
78
10
68
78
PROFICIENT
29%
33%
8%
_%
_%
_%
29%
40%
21%
29%
20%
31%
29%
LEVEL 1
15
19%
7
11%
8
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
19%
1
3%
14
33%
15
19%
4
40%
11
16%
15
19%
LEVEL 2
40
51%
37
56%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
51%
20
57%
20
47%
40
51%
4
40%
36
53%
40
51%
LEVEL 3
18
23%
17
26%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
23%
9
26%
9
21%
18
23%
2
20%
16
24%
18
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
5
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
6%
5
14%
0
0%
5
6%
0
0%
5
7%
5
6%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
20
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
23
36%
LEVEL 3
19
30%
LEVEL 4
20
31%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
6
50%
LEVEL 2
5
42%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
7
10%
LEVEL 2
25
35%
LEVEL 3
19
27%
LEVEL 4
20
28%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
11
34%
LEVEL 3
12
38%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
17
39%
LEVEL 3
8
18%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
20
26%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
4
24%
LEVEL 2
9
53%
LEVEL 3
3
18%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
19
32%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
20
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
64
12
1
2
1
71
1
5
32
44
76
17
59
76
PROFICIENT
53%
61%
8%
_%
_%
_%
55%
_%
20%
53%
52%
53%
24%
61%
53%
LEVEL 1
8
11%
2
3%
6
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
10%
_
_
1
20%
4
13%
4
9%
8
11%
4
24%
4
7%
8
11%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
23
36%
5
42%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
35%
_
_
3
60%
11
34%
17
39%
28
37%
9
53%
19
32%
28
37%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
19
30%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
27%
_
_
1
20%
12
38%
8
18%
20
26%
3
18%
17
29%
20
26%
LEVEL 4
20
26%
20
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
28%
_
_
0
0%
5
16%
15
34%
20
26%
1
6%
19
32%
20
26%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
18
27%
LEVEL 2
19
29%
LEVEL 3
28
42%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
6
12%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
27
52%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
12
86%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
16
27%
LEVEL 2
16
27%
LEVEL 3
27
45%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
12
30%
LEVEL 3
20
50%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
11
42%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
8
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
13
23%
LEVEL 2
16
29%
LEVEL 3
26
46%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
18
27%
LEVEL 2
19
29%
LEVEL 3
28
42%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
52
14
2
1
3
60
6
40
26
65
1
10
56
66
PROFICIENT
44%
54%
7%
_%
_%
_%
47%
17%
53%
31%
_%
_%
20%
48%
44%
LEVEL 1
18
27%
6
12%
12
86%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
27%
2
33%
7
18%
11
42%
_
_
_
_
5
50%
13
23%
18
27%
LEVEL 2
19
29%
18
35%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
27%
3
50%
12
30%
7
27%
_
_
_
_
3
30%
16
29%
19
29%
LEVEL 3
28
42%
27
52%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
45%
1
17%
20
50%
8
31%
_
_
_
_
2
20%
26
46%
28
42%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
30
38%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
25
40%
LEVEL 3
22
35%
LEVEL 4
11
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
11
65%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
14
19%
LEVEL 2
27
37%
LEVEL 3
22
30%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
8
21%
LEVEL 2
17
45%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
7
17%
LEVEL 2
13
32%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
7
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
30
38%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
4
31%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
11
17%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
20
30%
LEVEL 4
11
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
30
38%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
79
62
17
1
1
4
73
6
38
41
79
13
66
79
PROFICIENT
43%
53%
6%
_%
_%
_%
44%
33%
34%
51%
43%
23%
47%
43%
LEVEL 1
15
19%
4
6%
11
65%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
19%
1
17%
8
21%
7
17%
15
19%
4
31%
11
17%
15
19%
LEVEL 2
30
38%
25
40%
5
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
37%
3
50%
17
45%
13
32%
30
38%
6
46%
24
36%
30
38%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
22
35%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
30%
1
17%
9
24%
14
34%
23
29%
3
23%
20
30%
23
29%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
11
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
14%
1
17%
4
11%
7
17%
11
14%
0
0%
11
17%
11
14%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
10
14%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
LEVEL 3
24
35%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
General Education
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
17
28%
LEVEL 3
24
39%
LEVEL 4
16
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
10
14%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
LEVEL 3
24
35%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
Female
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
7
24%
LEVEL 2
7
24%
LEVEL 3
8
28%
LEVEL 4
7
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
12
30%
LEVEL 3
16
40%
LEVEL 4
9
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
10
14%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
LEVEL 3
24
35%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
17
28%
LEVEL 3
21
34%
LEVEL 4
15
25%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
10
14%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
LEVEL 3
24
35%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
61
8
1
1
65
2
69
29
40
69
8
61
69
PROFICIENT
58%
66%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
58%
52%
63%
58%
50%
59%
58%
LEVEL 1
10
14%
4
7%
6
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
14%
7
24%
3
8%
10
14%
2
25%
8
13%
10
14%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
17
28%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
28%
7
24%
12
30%
19
28%
2
25%
17
28%
19
28%
LEVEL 3
24
35%
24
39%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
35%
8
28%
16
40%
24
35%
3
38%
21
34%
24
35%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
16
26%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
23%
7
24%
9
23%
16
23%
1
13%
15
25%
16
23%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 292
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
24
32%
LEVEL 2
32
43%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
13
22%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
11
73%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
20
29%
LEVEL 2
29
43%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
10
31%
LEVEL 2
15
47%
LEVEL 3
7
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
14
33%
LEVEL 2
17
40%
LEVEL 3
11
26%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
24
32%
LEVEL 2
32
43%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
6
55%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
18
28%
LEVEL 2
27
42%
LEVEL 3
18
28%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
24
32%
LEVEL 2
32
43%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
60
15
1
4
2
68
7
32
43
75
11
64
75
PROFICIENT
25%
30%
7%
_%
_%
_%
28%
0%
22%
28%
25%
0%
30%
25%
LEVEL 1
24
32%
13
22%
11
73%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
29%
4
57%
10
31%
14
33%
24
32%
6
55%
18
28%
24
32%
LEVEL 2
32
43%
29
48%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
43%
3
43%
15
47%
17
40%
32
43%
5
45%
27
42%
32
43%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
17
28%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
26%
0
0%
7
22%
11
26%
18
24%
0
0%
18
28%
18
24%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
19
25%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
26
39%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
8
80%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
19
25%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
9
26%
LEVEL 2
12
34%
LEVEL 3
9
26%
LEVEL 4
5
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
12
29%
LEVEL 2
16
39%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
19
25%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
6
67%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
15
22%
LEVEL 2
27
40%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
19
25%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
66
10
1
2
73
76
35
41
76
9
67
76
PROFICIENT
36%
41%
0%
_%
_%
_%
36%
40%
32%
36%
22%
37%
36%
LEVEL 1
21
28%
13
20%
8
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
28%
9
26%
12
29%
21
28%
6
67%
15
22%
21
28%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
26
39%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
37%
12
34%
16
39%
28
37%
1
11%
27
40%
28
37%
LEVEL 3
19
25%
19
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
25%
9
26%
10
24%
19
25%
2
22%
17
25%
19
25%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
8
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
11%
5
14%
3
7%
8
11%
0
0%
8
12%
8
11%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
16
21%
LEVEL 2
38
51%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
36
57%
LEVEL 3
17
27%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
14
20%
LEVEL 2
35
50%
LEVEL 3
17
24%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
11
35%
LEVEL 2
14
45%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
24
55%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
16
21%
LEVEL 2
38
51%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
5
29%
LEVEL 2
11
65%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
11
19%
LEVEL 2
27
47%
LEVEL 3
16
28%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
16
21%
LEVEL 2
38
51%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
63
12
1
2
1
70
1
5
31
44
75
17
58
75
PROFICIENT
28%
33%
0%
_%
_%
_%
30%
_%
0%
19%
34%
28%
6%
34%
28%
LEVEL 1
16
21%
6
10%
10
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
20%
_
_
2
40%
11
35%
5
11%
16
21%
5
29%
11
19%
16
21%
LEVEL 2
38
51%
36
57%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
50%
_
_
3
60%
14
45%
24
55%
38
51%
11
65%
27
47%
38
51%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
17
27%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
24%
_
_
0
0%
5
16%
12
27%
17
23%
1
6%
16
28%
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
4
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
6%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
3
7%
4
5%
0
0%
4
7%
4
5%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
18
27%
LEVEL 2
27
41%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
25
48%
LEVEL 3
20
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
11
79%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
14
23%
LEVEL 2
25
42%
LEVEL 3
21
35%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
10
25%
LEVEL 2
20
50%
LEVEL 3
10
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
8
31%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
11
42%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
6
60%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
12
21%
LEVEL 2
25
45%
LEVEL 3
19
34%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
18
27%
LEVEL 2
27
41%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
52
14
2
1
3
60
6
40
26
65
1
10
56
66
PROFICIENT
32%
38%
7%
_%
_%
_%
35%
0%
25%
42%
_%
_%
20%
34%
32%
LEVEL 1
18
27%
7
13%
11
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
23%
4
67%
10
25%
8
31%
_
_
_
_
6
60%
12
21%
18
27%
LEVEL 2
27
41%
25
48%
2
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
42%
2
33%
20
50%
7
27%
_
_
_
_
2
20%
25
45%
27
41%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
20
38%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
35%
0
0%
10
25%
11
42%
_
_
_
_
2
20%
19
34%
21
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
16
20%
LEVEL 2
33
42%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
31
50%
LEVEL 3
21
34%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
13
76%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
15
21%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
21
29%
LEVEL 4
7
10%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
10
26%
LEVEL 2
17
45%
LEVEL 3
10
26%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
6
15%
LEVEL 2
16
39%
LEVEL 3
13
32%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
16
20%
LEVEL 2
33
42%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
26
39%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
16
20%
LEVEL 2
33
42%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
79
62
17
1
1
4
73
6
38
41
79
13
66
79
PROFICIENT
38%
45%
12%
_%
_%
_%
38%
33%
29%
46%
38%
23%
41%
38%
LEVEL 1
16
20%
3
5%
13
76%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
21%
1
17%
10
26%
6
15%
16
20%
3
23%
13
20%
16
20%
LEVEL 2
33
42%
31
50%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
41%
3
50%
17
45%
16
39%
33
42%
7
54%
26
39%
33
42%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
21
34%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
29%
2
33%
10
26%
13
32%
23
29%
2
15%
21
32%
23
29%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
7
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
10%
0
0%
1
3%
6
15%
7
9%
1
8%
6
9%
7
9%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 86
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
51
68%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
46
77%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
6
40%
LEVEL 4
5
33%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
49
72%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
11
34%
LEVEL 4
20
63%
Male
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
7
16%
LEVEL 4
31
72%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
51
68%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
6
55%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
15
23%
LEVEL 4
45
70%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
51
68%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
60
15
1
4
2
68
7
32
43
75
11
64
75
PROFICIENT
92%
97%
73%
_%
_%
_%
93%
86%
97%
88%
92%
82%
94%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
2
3%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
7%
1
14%
1
3%
5
12%
6
8%
2
18%
4
6%
6
8%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
12
20%
6
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
21%
4
57%
11
34%
7
16%
18
24%
3
27%
15
23%
18
24%
LEVEL 4
51
68%
46
77%
5
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
72%
2
29%
20
63%
31
72%
51
68%
6
55%
45
70%
51
68%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 75
All Students
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
12
18%
LEVEL 3
31
48%
LEVEL 4
21
32%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
25
52%
LEVEL 4
19
40%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
9
53%
LEVEL 3
6
35%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
11
18%
LEVEL 3
29
48%
LEVEL 4
20
33%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
31%
LEVEL 3
14
44%
LEVEL 4
7
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
17
52%
LEVEL 4
14
42%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
12
18%
LEVEL 3
31
48%
LEVEL 4
21
32%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
8
15%
LEVEL 3
24
44%
LEVEL 4
21
39%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
12
18%
LEVEL 3
31
48%
LEVEL 4
21
32%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
48
17
1
4
60
5
32
33
65
11
54
65
PROFICIENT
80%
92%
47%
_%
_%
82%
60%
66%
94%
80%
64%
83%
80%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
20%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
12
18%
3
6%
9
53%
_
_
_
_
11
18%
1
20%
10
31%
2
6%
12
18%
4
36%
8
15%
12
18%
LEVEL 3
31
48%
25
52%
6
35%
_
_
_
_
29
48%
2
40%
14
44%
17
52%
31
48%
7
64%
24
44%
31
48%
LEVEL 4
21
32%
19
40%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
20
33%
1
20%
7
22%
14
42%
21
32%
0
0%
21
39%
21
32%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
14
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
14
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
14
100%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
53
52%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
33
37%
LEVEL 4
51
57%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
53
52%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
19
31%
LEVEL 4
38
61%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
19
48%
LEVEL 4
15
38%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
53
52%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
8
47%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
30
35%
LEVEL 4
49
58%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
53
52%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
89
13
2
1
99
102
62
40
102
17
85
102
PROFICIENT
89%
94%
54%
_%
_%
_%
89%
92%
85%
89%
71%
93%
89%
LEVEL 1
2
2%
1
1%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
1
2%
1
3%
2
2%
2
12%
0
0%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
0
0%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
2
3%
2
5%
4
4%
2
12%
2
2%
4
4%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
33
37%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
37%
19
31%
19
48%
38
37%
8
47%
30
35%
38
37%
LEVEL 4
53
52%
51
57%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
53
52%
38
61%
15
38%
53
52%
4
24%
49
58%
53
52%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
53
52%
LEVEL 4
42
41%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
46
52%
LEVEL 4
42
47%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
7
54%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
53
52%
LEVEL 4
42
41%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
33
53%
LEVEL 4
25
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
20
50%
LEVEL 4
17
43%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
53
52%
LEVEL 4
42
41%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
65%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
42
49%
LEVEL 4
40
47%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
53
52%
LEVEL 4
42
41%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
89
13
2
1
99
102
62
40
102
17
85
102
PROFICIENT
93%
99%
54%
_%
_%
_%
93%
94%
93%
93%
76%
96%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
0
0%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
0
0%
2
5%
2
2%
0
0%
2
2%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
53
52%
46
52%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
53
52%
33
53%
20
50%
53
52%
11
65%
42
49%
53
52%
LEVEL 4
42
41%
42
47%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
41%
25
40%
17
43%
42
41%
2
12%
40
47%
42
41%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
55
54%
LEVEL 4
39
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
49
55%
LEVEL 4
37
42%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
55
54%
LEVEL 4
39
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
36
58%
LEVEL 4
21
34%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
19
48%
LEVEL 4
18
45%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
55
54%
LEVEL 4
39
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
71%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
43
51%
LEVEL 4
38
45%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
55
54%
LEVEL 4
39
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
89
13
2
1
99
102
62
40
102
17
85
102
PROFICIENT
92%
97%
62%
_%
_%
_%
92%
92%
93%
92%
76%
95%
92%
LEVEL 1
2
2%
1
1%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
1
2%
1
3%
2
2%
1
6%
1
1%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
55
54%
49
55%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
55
54%
36
58%
19
48%
55
54%
12
71%
43
51%
55
54%
LEVEL 4
39
38%
37
42%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
38%
21
34%
18
45%
39
38%
1
6%
38
45%
39
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
71
70%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
LEVEL 4
68
76%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
71
70%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
24%
LEVEL 4
41
66%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
7
18%
LEVEL 4
30
75%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
71
70%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
5
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
66
78%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
LEVEL 4
71
70%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
89
13
2
1
99
102
62
40
102
17
85
102
PROFICIENT
91%
96%
62%
_%
_%
_%
91%
90%
93%
91%
71%
95%
91%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
22%
17
19%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
22%
15
24%
7
18%
22
22%
7
41%
15
18%
22
22%
LEVEL 4
71
70%
68
76%
3
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
71
70%
41
66%
30
75%
71
70%
5
29%
66
78%
71
70%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
43
42%
LEVEL 4
56
55%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
36
40%
LEVEL 4
52
58%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
54%
LEVEL 4
4
31%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
43
42%
LEVEL 4
56
55%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
28
45%
LEVEL 4
32
52%
Male
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
24
60%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
43
42%
LEVEL 4
56
55%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
53%
LEVEL 4
6
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
34
40%
LEVEL 4
50
59%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
43
42%
LEVEL 4
56
55%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
89
13
2
1
99
102
62
40
102
17
85
102
PROFICIENT
97%
99%
85%
_%
_%
_%
97%
97%
98%
97%
88%
99%
97%
LEVEL 1
2
2%
1
1%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
1
2%
1
3%
2
2%
1
6%
1
1%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
43
42%
36
40%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
42%
28
45%
15
38%
43
42%
9
53%
34
40%
43
42%
LEVEL 4
56
55%
52
58%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
55%
32
52%
24
60%
56
55%
6
35%
50
59%
56
55%
Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
68
14
0
1
2
3
76
0
6
42
40
82
0
15
67
0
82
55
79
96%
67
99%
12
86%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
74
97%
0
0%
5
83%
42
100%
37
93%
79
96%
0
0%
12
80%
67
100%
0
0%
79
96%
65
69
84%
63
93%
6
43%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
64
84%
0
0%
5
83%
39
93%
30
75%
69
84%
0
0%
10
67%
59
88%
0
0%
69
84%
85
20
24%
20
29%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
24%
0
0%
2
33%
13
31%
7
18%
20
24%
0
0%
1
7%
19
28%
0
0%
20
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
96%
65
69
84%
85
20
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
63
93%
85
20
29%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
6
43%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
97%
65
64
84%
85
18
24%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
5
83%
85
2
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
100%
65
39
93%
85
13
31%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
93%
65
30
75%
85
7
18%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
96%
65
69
84%
85
20
24%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
80%
65
10
67%
85
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
100%
65
59
88%
85
19
28%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
96%
65
69
84%
85
20
24%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
79
64
15
0
1
2
1
75
0
79
38
41
79
0
13
66
0
79
55
73
92%
63
98%
10
67%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
73
92%
36
95%
37
90%
73
92%
0
0%
12
92%
61
92%
0
0%
73
92%
65
70
89%
62
97%
8
53%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
70
89%
33
87%
37
90%
70
89%
0
0%
11
85%
59
89%
0
0%
70
89%
85
42
53%
40
63%
2
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
42
53%
22
58%
20
49%
42
53%
0
0%
6
46%
36
55%
0
0%
42
53%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
92%
65
70
89%
85
42
53%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
63
98%
65
62
97%
85
40
63%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
67%
65
8
53%
85
2
13%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
92%
65
70
89%
85
42
53%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
95%
65
33
87%
85
22
58%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
90%
65
37
90%
85
20
49%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
92%
65
70
89%
85
42
53%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
11
85%
85
6
46%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
92%
65
59
89%
85
36
55%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
92%
65
70
89%
85
42
53%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
57
55
2
0
1
1
0
55
0
57
26
31
57
0
3
54
0
57
55
53
93%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
53
93%
24
92%
29
94%
53
93%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
53
93%
65
51
89%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
51
89%
22
85%
29
94%
51
89%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
51
89%
85
13
23%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
13
23%
9
35%
4
13%
13
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
13
23%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
93%
65
51
89%
85
13
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
93%
65
51
89%
85
13
23%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
92%
65
22
85%
85
9
35%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
94%
65
29
94%
85
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
93%
65
51
89%
85
13
23%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
93%
65
51
89%
85
13
23%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
42
41
1
0
0
1
3
38
0
42
20
22
42
0
2
40
0
42
55
31
74%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
31
74%
15
75%
16
73%
31
74%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
31
74%
65
31
74%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
31
74%
15
75%
16
73%
31
74%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
31
74%
85
14
33%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
14
33%
9
45%
5
23%
14
33%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
14
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
74%
65
31
74%
85
14
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
74%
65
31
74%
85
14
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
75%
65
15
75%
85
9
45%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
73%
65
16
73%
85
5
23%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
74%
65
31
74%
85
14
33%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
74%
65
31
74%
85
14
33%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
81
66
15
0
1
2
2
76
0
5
35
46
81
0
14
67
0
81
55
76
94%
64
97%
12
80%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
71
93%
0
0%
5
100%
33
94%
43
93%
76
94%
0
0%
14
100%
62
93%
0
0%
76
94%
65
70
86%
61
92%
9
60%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
66
87%
0
0%
4
80%
30
86%
40
87%
70
86%
0
0%
12
86%
58
87%
0
0%
70
86%
85
24
30%
24
36%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
29%
0
0%
2
40%
9
26%
15
33%
24
30%
0
0%
1
7%
23
34%
0
0%
24
30%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
94%
65
70
86%
85
24
30%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
97%
65
61
92%
85
24
36%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
80%
65
9
60%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
71
93%
65
66
87%
85
22
29%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
30
86%
85
9
26%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
93%
65
40
87%
85
15
33%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
94%
65
70
86%
85
24
30%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
93%
65
58
87%
85
23
34%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
94%
65
70
86%
85
24
30%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
71
60
11
0
1
2
2
66
0
5
38
33
71
0
12
59
0
71
55
71
100%
60
100%
11
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
66
100%
0
0%
5
100%
38
100%
33
100%
71
100%
0
0%
12
100%
59
100%
0
0%
71
100%
65
70
99%
60
100%
10
91%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
98%
0
0%
5
100%
38
100%
32
97%
70
99%
0
0%
12
100%
58
98%
0
0%
70
99%
85
47
66%
42
70%
5
45%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
65%
0
0%
4
80%
20
53%
27
82%
47
66%
0
0%
5
42%
42
71%
0
0%
47
66%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
71
100%
65
70
99%
85
47
66%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
100%
65
60
100%
85
42
70%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
10
91%
85
5
45%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
100%
65
65
98%
85
43
65%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
4
80%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
100%
65
38
100%
85
20
53%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
100%
65
32
97%
85
27
82%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
71
100%
65
70
99%
85
47
66%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
5
42%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
100%
65
58
98%
85
42
71%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
71
100%
65
70
99%
85
47
66%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
95
80
15
0
1
2
4
88
0
7
43
52
94
1
10
85
0
95
55
93
98%
79
99%
14
93%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
87
99%
0
0%
6
86%
42
98%
51
98%
_
_
_
_
9
90%
84
99%
0
0%
93
98%
65
88
93%
79
99%
9
60%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
83
94%
0
0%
5
71%
39
91%
49
94%
_
_
_
_
8
80%
80
94%
0
0%
88
93%
85
50
53%
48
60%
2
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
48
55%
0
0%
2
29%
22
51%
28
54%
_
_
_
_
2
20%
48
56%
0
0%
50
53%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
93
98%
65
88
93%
85
50
53%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
99%
65
79
99%
85
48
60%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
93%
65
9
60%
85
2
13%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
99%
65
83
94%
85
48
55%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
5
71%
85
2
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
39
91%
85
22
51%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
98%
65
49
94%
85
28
54%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
8
80%
85
2
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
99%
65
80
94%
85
48
56%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
93
98%
65
88
93%
85
50
53%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
67
58
9
0
1
2
1
63
0
67
29
38
67
0
11
56
0
67
55
66
99%
58
100%
8
89%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
66
99%
28
97%
38
100%
66
99%
0
0%
11
100%
55
98%
0
0%
66
99%
65
61
91%
55
95%
6
67%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
61
91%
26
90%
35
92%
61
91%
0
0%
9
82%
52
93%
0
0%
61
91%
85
29
43%
28
48%
1
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
29
43%
15
52%
14
37%
29
43%
0
0%
3
27%
26
46%
0
0%
29
43%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
99%
65
61
91%
85
29
43%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
100%
65
55
95%
85
28
48%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
99%
65
61
91%
85
29
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
97%
65
26
90%
85
15
52%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
100%
65
35
92%
85
14
37%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
99%
65
61
91%
85
29
43%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
9
82%
85
3
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
98%
65
52
93%
85
26
46%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
99%
65
61
91%
85
29
43%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
49
46
3
0
1
2
2
44
0
5
26
23
49
0
5
44
0
49
55
49
100%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
100%
0
0%
5
100%
26
100%
23
100%
49
100%
0
0%
5
100%
44
100%
0
0%
49
100%
65
39
80%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
80%
0
0%
4
80%
20
77%
19
83%
39
80%
0
0%
4
80%
35
80%
0
0%
39
80%
85
9
18%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
18%
0
0%
1
20%
4
15%
5
22%
9
18%
0
0%
0
0%
9
20%
0
0%
9
18%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
100%
65
39
80%
85
9
18%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
100%
65
35
80%
85
8
18%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
100%
65
20
77%
85
4
15%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
100%
65
19
83%
85
5
22%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
100%
65
39
80%
85
9
18%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
100%
65
35
80%
85
9
20%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
100%
65
39
80%
85
9
18%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
26
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
13
13
26
0
1
25
0
26
55
25
96%
25
96%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
25
96%
0
0%
13
100%
12
92%
25
96%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
25
96%
65
21
81%
21
81%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
21
81%
0
0%
12
92%
9
69%
21
81%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
21
81%
85
9
35%
9
35%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
9
35%
0
0%
4
31%
5
38%
9
35%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
9
35%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
96%
65
21
81%
85
9
35%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
96%
65
21
81%
85
9
35%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
96%
65
21
81%
85
9
35%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
12
92%
85
4
31%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
9
69%
85
5
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
96%
65
21
81%
85
9
35%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
96%
65
21
81%
85
9
35%
Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
Reading
1
_
Writing
1
_
1
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
_
1
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
General Education
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Black or African American
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Hispanic or Latino
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
White
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Multiracial
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Small Group Total
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Female
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Male
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Not Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
0%
0%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
0 0%
TOTAL TESTED: 0
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
0
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
0 0%
TOTAL TESTED: 0
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
0
LEVEL 4
0
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2012 - 13)
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
448
0
10
13
6
416
3
82
1
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
98%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
435
0
8
12
6
406
3
84✝
1
66
PI
122
―
―
―
―
124
―
49✝
―
82
EAMO
77
―
―
―
―
100
―
24
―
54
Safe Harbor Target
77
―
―
―
―
100
―
24
―
54
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
448
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
435
PI
122
EAMO
77
Safe Harbor Target
77
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
416
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
406
PI
124
EAMO
100
Safe Harbor Target
100
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
82
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
84✝
PI
49✝
EAMO
24
Safe Harbor Target
24
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
66
PI
82
EAMO
54
Safe Harbor Target
54
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
448
438
435
442
32
445
366
447
379
239
209
0
448
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
100%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
100%
99%
―
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
435
427
423
429
29
432
357
434
369
232
203
0
435
PI
122
123
123
122
―
122
140
123
130
117
129
―
122
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
448
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
435
PI
122
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
438
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
427
PI
123
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
435
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
423
PI
123
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
442
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
429
PI
122
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
29
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
445
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
432
PI
122
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
366
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
357
PI
140
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
447
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
434
PI
123
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
379
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
369
PI
130
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
239
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
232
PI
117
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
209
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
203
PI
129
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
448
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
435
PI
122
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
447
0
10
13
6
415
3
82
1
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
95%
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
432
0
8
12
6
403
3
82✝
1
65
PI
113
―
―
―
―
116
―
40✝
―
78
EAMO
74
―
―
―
―
94
―
26
―
50
Safe Harbor Target
74
―
―
―
―
94
―
26
―
50
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
447
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
432
PI
113
EAMO
74
Safe Harbor Target
74
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
415
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
403
PI
116
EAMO
94
Safe Harbor Target
94
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
82
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
82✝
PI
40✝
EAMO
26
Safe Harbor Target
26
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
65
PI
78
EAMO
50
Safe Harbor Target
50
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
447
437
434
441
32
444
365
446
378
239
208
0
447
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
432
424
420
426
29
429
356
431
367
230
202
0
432
PI
113
114
114
113
―
114
131
113
119
120
105
―
113
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
447
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
432
PI
113
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
437
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
424
PI
114
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
434
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
420
PI
114
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
441
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
426
PI
113
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
29
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
444
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
429
PI
114
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
365
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
356
PI
131
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
446
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
431
PI
113
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
378
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
367
PI
119
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
239
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
230
PI
120
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
105
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
447
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
432
PI
113
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
0
5
6
2
142
0
33
0
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
0
4
5
2
141
0
36✝
0
23
PI
188
―
―
―
―
189
―
164✝
―
―
EAMO
173
―
―
―
―
183
―
142
―
―
Progress Target
173
―
―
―
―
183
―
1
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
PI
188
EAMO
173
Progress Target
173
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
142
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
141
PI
189
EAMO
183
Progress Target
183
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
33
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
36✝
PI
164✝
EAMO
142
Progress Target
1
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
150
149
153
13
155
122
155
131
85
70
0
155
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
148
147
150
11
152
120
152
129
83
69
0
152
PI
188
189
188
187
―
188
195
188
189
193
181
―
188
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
PI
188
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
148
PI
189
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
149
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
147
PI
188
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
153
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
150
PI
187
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
PI
188
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
122
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
120
PI
195
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
PI
188
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
129
PI
189
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
85
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
83
PI
193
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
70
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
69
PI
181
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
PI
188
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
96
0
0
2
2
92
0
11
0
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
0
0
1
2
96
0
11
0
15
PI
166
―
―
―
―
167
―
―
―
―
EAMO
153
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
153
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
166
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
153
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
96
PI
167
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
166
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
96
96
94
94
4
96
85
96
84
39
57
0
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
100%
―
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
99
98
97
3
99
88
99
84
39
60
0
99
PI
166
166
167
165
―
166
173
166
171
149
177
―
166
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
166
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
166
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
94
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
167
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
94
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
97
PI
165
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
166
General Education
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
88
PI
173
English Proficient
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
166
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
171
Male
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
149
Female
12th Graders
57
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
177
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
166
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
96
0
0
2
2
92
0
11
0
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
0
0
1
2
96
0
11
0
15
PI
170
―
―
―
―
170
―
―
―
―
EAMO
132
―
―
―
―
148
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
132
―
―
―
―
148
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
170
EAMO
132
Safe Harbor Target
132
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
96
PI
170
EAMO
148
Safe Harbor Target
148
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
96
96
94
94
4
96
85
96
84
39
57
0
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
100%
―
100%
―
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
99
98
97
3
99
88
99
84
39
60
0
99
PI
170
170
170
169
―
170
181
170
174
162
175
―
170
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
170
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
170
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
94
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
170
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
94
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
97
PI
169
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
170
General Education
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
88
PI
181
English Proficient
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
170
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
174
Male
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
162
Female
12th Graders
57
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
175
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
170
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
122
―
―
―
―
124
―
49
―
82
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
113
―
―
―
―
116
―
40
―
78
Secondary-Level ELA PI
166
―
―
―
―
167
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
170
―
―
―
―
170
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
143
0
0
0
0
144
0
45
0
80
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
122
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
113
Secondary-Level ELA PI
166
Secondary-Level MATH PI
170
Unweighted Combined PI
143
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
124
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
116
Secondary-Level ELA PI
167
Secondary-Level MATH PI
170
Unweighted Combined PI
144
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
49
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
40
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
45
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
82
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
78
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
80
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
0
2
5
0
117
0
14
0
12
Graduation Rate
90%
―
―
―
―
91%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
117
Graduation Rate
91%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
0
0
4
0
87
0
11
1
3
Graduation Rate
88%
―
―
―
―
89%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
88%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
87
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
122
119
124
7
124
110
124
112
66
58
0
124
Graduation Rate
90%
90%
91%
90%
―
90%
91%
90%
92%
88%
93%
―
90%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
91
87
91
4
91
80
90
88
40
51
0
91
Graduation Rate
88%
88%
89%
88%
―
88%
91%
89%
90%
78%
96%
―
88%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
122
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
119
Graduation Rate
91%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
90%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
90%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
110
Graduation Rate
91%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
112
Graduation Rate
92%
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
66
Graduation Rate
88%
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58
Graduation Rate
93%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
90%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
87
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
88%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
88%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
91%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
90
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
88
Graduation Rate
90%
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
78%
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
96%
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
88%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
35%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
35%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
6%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
