Skip to Content
Main content

DR KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

Grade 4 Science

MEAN SCORE: 66

All Students

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

37

43%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

General Education

PROFICIENT

61%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

32

45%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

62%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

33

46%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

Female

PROFICIENT

53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

Male

PROFICIENT

61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

20

45%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

62%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

36

47%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

56%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

34

41%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

37

43%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 87
  • 71
  • 16
  • 2
  • 71
  • 8
  • 3
  • 3
  • 8
  • 43
  • 44
  • 77
  • 10
  • 82
  • 5
  • 87
PROFICIENT
  • 57%
  • 61%
  • 44%
  • _%
  • 62%
  • 25%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 50%
  • 53%
  • 61%
  • 62%
  • 20%
  • 56%
  • 80%
  • 57%
LEVEL 1
  • 8
  • 9%
  • 5
  • 7%
  • 3
  • 19%
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 5%
  • 5
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 8
  • 10%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 8
  • 9%
LEVEL 2
  • 29
  • 33%
  • 23
  • 32%
  • 6
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • 21
  • 30%
  • 5
  • 63%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 14
  • 33%
  • 15
  • 34%
  • 24
  • 31%
  • 5
  • 50%
  • 28
  • 34%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 29
  • 33%
LEVEL 3
  • 37
  • 43%
  • 32
  • 45%
  • 5
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • 33
  • 46%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 17
  • 40%
  • 20
  • 45%
  • 36
  • 47%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 34
  • 41%
  • 3
  • 60%
  • 37
  • 43%
LEVEL 4
  • 13
  • 15%
  • 11
  • 15%
  • 2
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 15%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 7
  • 16%
  • 12
  • 16%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 12
  • 15%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 13
  • 15%

Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 80%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Progress Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

90

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

98%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

86

PI

148

EAMO

170

Progress Target

155

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

72

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

153

EAMO

154

Progress Target

154

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

8

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

4

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

4

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

19

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

16

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

10

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

10

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

84

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

98%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

81

PI

146

EAMO

160

Progress Target

154

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 90
  • 18
  • 82
  • 88
  • 86
  • 86
  • 71
  • 80
  • 6
  • 47
  • 43
  • 0
  • 90
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 98%
  • ―
  • 98%
  • 98%
  • 99%
  • 99%
  • 100%
  • 98%
  • ―
  • 96%
  • 100%
  • ―
  • 98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 86
  • 16
  • 78
  • 84
  • 83
  • 83
  • 70
  • 76
  • 5
  • 43
  • 43
  • 0
  • 86
PI
  • 148
  • ―
  • 151
  • 149
  • 148
  • 147
  • 153
  • 155
  • ―
  • 156
  • 140
  • ―
  • 148
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

90

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

98%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

86

PI

148

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

18

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

16

PI

―

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

82

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

98%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

78

PI

151

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

88

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

98%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

84

PI

149

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

86

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

99%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

83

PI

148

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

86

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

99%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

83

PI

147

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

71

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

100%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

153

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

80

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

98%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

76

PI

155

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

6

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

5

PI

―

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

47

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

96%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

43

PI

156

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

43

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

100%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

43

PI

140

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

90

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

98%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

86

PI

148

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.