Skip to Content
Main content

HARRISVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

HARRISVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2012 - 13)

K-12 ENROLLMENT
180

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE
FEMALE

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

HARRISVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2012 - 13)

K-12 Enrollment: 180

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

91

51%

FEMALE

89

49%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

4

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

2

1%

WHITE

172

96%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

20

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

106

59%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

K (FULL DAY)

28

14%

1ST GRADE

29

15%

2ND GRADE

22

11%

3RD GRADE

25

13%

4TH GRADE

30

15%

5TH GRADE

43

22%

6TH GRADE

1

1%

UNGRADED ELEMENTARY

2

1%

Average Class Size (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • Common Branch
CLASS SIZE
  • 14

Average Class Size (2012 - 13)

Common Branch
14

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2012 - 13)

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
  • 137
  • 76%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
  • 68
  • 38%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2012 - 13)

Eligible for Free Lunch

137

76%

Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

68

38%

ATTENDANCE (2011 - 12)

  • ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
  • 96%

Attendance (2011 - 12)

Annual Attendance Rate

96%

Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)

Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
  • 17%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
  • 11%

Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)

Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience

17%

Turnover Rate of All Teachers

11%

Staff Counts (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • PRINCIPALS
  • ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
  • OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
  • PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
  • 1
  • 0
  • 3
  • 0

Staff Counts (2012 - 13)

Principals
1
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
3
Paraprofessionals
0

Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)

Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)

TOTAL TEACHERS: 18
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
6%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
17%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
11%
Total Number of Core Classes
26
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
4%
Total Number of Classes
38
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%

Grade 3 English Language Arts

MEAN SCORE: 309

All Students

PROFICIENT

46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Female

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Male

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

7

58%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 24
  • 23
  • 1
  • 24
  • 10
  • 14
  • 24
  • 12
  • 12
  • 24
PROFICIENT
  • 46%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 46%
  • 50%
  • 43%
  • 46%
  • 25%
  • 67%
  • 46%
LEVEL 1
  • 9
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 38%
  • 4
  • 40%
  • 5
  • 36%
  • 9
  • 38%
  • 7
  • 58%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 9
  • 38%
LEVEL 2
  • 4
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 17%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 4
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 4
  • 17%
LEVEL 3
  • 10
  • 42%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 10
  • 42%
  • 4
  • 40%
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 10
  • 42%
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 7
  • 58%
  • 10
  • 42%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 4%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 4%

Grade 4 English Language Arts

MEAN SCORE: 282

All Students

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Female

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

Male

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 31
  • 28
  • 3
  • 31
  • 13
  • 18
  • 31
  • 19
  • 12
  • 31
PROFICIENT
  • 13%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 13%
  • 15%
  • 11%
  • 13%
  • 16%
  • 8%
  • 13%
LEVEL 1
  • 18
  • 58%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 18
  • 58%
  • 7
  • 54%
  • 11
  • 61%
  • 18
  • 58%
  • 13
  • 68%
  • 5
  • 42%
  • 18
  • 58%
LEVEL 2
  • 9
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 29%
  • 4
  • 31%
  • 5
  • 28%
  • 9
  • 29%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • 6
  • 50%
  • 9
  • 29%
LEVEL 3
  • 2
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 11%
  • 2
  • 6%
  • 2
  • 11%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 6%
LEVEL 4
  • 2
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 6%
  • 2
  • 15%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 6%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 2
  • 6%

Grade 5 English Language Arts

MEAN SCORE: 286

All Students

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

General Education

PROFICIENT

19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

5

100%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Female

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Male

PROFICIENT

16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 42
  • 37
  • 5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 40
  • 42
  • 23
  • 19
  • 42
  • 28
  • 14
  • 42
PROFICIENT
  • 17%
  • 19%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 17%
  • 17%
  • 16%
  • 17%
  • 14%
  • 21%
  • 17%
LEVEL 1
  • 21
  • 50%
  • 16
  • 43%
  • 5
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 21
  • 50%
  • 13
  • 57%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 21
  • 50%
  • 15
  • 54%
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 21
  • 50%
LEVEL 2
  • 14
  • 33%
  • 14
  • 38%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 14
  • 33%
  • 6
  • 26%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 14
  • 33%
  • 9
  • 32%
  • 5
  • 36%
  • 14
  • 33%
LEVEL 3
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 6
  • 16%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 3
  • 13%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 3
  • 11%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 6
  • 14%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%

Grade 3 Mathematics

MEAN SCORE: 315

All Students

PROFICIENT

58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

Female

PROFICIENT

40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

Male

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 24
  • 23
  • 1
  • 24
  • 10
  • 14
  • 24
  • 12
  • 12
  • 24
PROFICIENT
  • 58%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 58%
  • 40%
  • 71%
  • 58%
  • 42%
  • 75%
  • 58%
LEVEL 1
  • 5
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 21%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 5
  • 21%
  • 4
  • 33%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 5
  • 21%
LEVEL 2
  • 5
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 21%
  • 4
  • 40%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 5
  • 21%
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 5
  • 21%
LEVEL 3
  • 8
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 33%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 8
  • 33%
  • 4
  • 33%
  • 4
  • 33%
  • 8
  • 33%
LEVEL 4
  • 6
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 25%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 29%
  • 6
  • 25%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 5
  • 42%
  • 6
  • 25%

Grade 4 Mathematics

MEAN SCORE: 286

All Students

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 31
  • 28
  • 3
  • 31
  • 13
  • 18
  • 31
  • 19
  • 12
  • 31
PROFICIENT
  • 10%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 10%
  • 15%
  • 6%
  • 10%
  • 5%
  • 17%
  • 10%
LEVEL 1
  • 13
  • 42%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 13
  • 42%
  • 5
  • 38%
  • 8
  • 44%
  • 13
  • 42%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 5
  • 42%
  • 13
  • 42%
LEVEL 2
  • 15
  • 48%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 15
  • 48%
  • 6
  • 46%
  • 9
  • 50%
  • 15
  • 48%
  • 10
  • 53%
  • 5
  • 42%
  • 15
  • 48%
LEVEL 3
  • 3
  • 10%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 10%
  • 2
  • 15%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 10%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 3
  • 10%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 5 Mathematics

MEAN SCORE: 284

All Students

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

5

100%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 41
  • 36
  • 5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 39
  • 41
  • 22
  • 19
  • 41
  • 27
  • 14
  • 41
PROFICIENT
  • 10%
  • 11%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 10%
  • 14%
  • 5%
  • 10%
  • 11%
  • 7%
  • 10%
LEVEL 1
  • 23
  • 56%
  • 18
  • 50%
  • 5
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 23
  • 56%
  • 14
  • 64%
  • 9
  • 47%
  • 23
  • 56%
  • 16
  • 59%
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 23
  • 56%
LEVEL 2
  • 14
  • 34%
  • 14
  • 39%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 14
  • 34%
  • 5
  • 23%
  • 9
  • 47%
  • 14
  • 34%
  • 8
  • 30%
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 14
  • 34%
LEVEL 3
  • 4
  • 10%
  • 4
  • 11%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 4
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 4
  • 10%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.