HARRISVILLE CSD - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
11%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
11%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
7%
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
2
0
3
13
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
Principals
2
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
3
Paraprofessionals
13
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS
42
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
7%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
10%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
10%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
115
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
3%
Total Number of Classes
164
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
7%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 42
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
7%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
10%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
10%
Total Number of Core Classes
115
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
3%
Total Number of Classes
164
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
7%
High School Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
25
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
31
25
6
REGENTS DIPLOMA
29
94%
25
100%
4
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
7
23%
7
28%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
13
42%
10
40%
3
50%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
6%
0
0%
2
33%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
9%
0
0%
3
33%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
31
Regents Diploma
29
94%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
7
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
42%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
6%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
9%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
25
Regents Diploma
25
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
7
28%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
10
40%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
6
Regents Diploma
4
67%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
50%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
33%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
33%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
25
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
31
25
6
REGENTS DIPLOMA
29
94%
25
100%
4
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
7
23%
7
28%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
13
42%
10
40%
3
50%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
6%
0
0%
2
33%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
9%
0
0%
3
33%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
31
Regents Diploma
29
94%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
7
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
42%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
6%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
9%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
25
Regents Diploma
25
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
7
28%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
10
40%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
6
Regents Diploma
4
67%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
50%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
33%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
33%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
25
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
31
25
6
REGENTS DIPLOMA
29
94%
25
100%
4
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
7
23%
7
28%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
13
42%
10
40%
3
50%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
6%
0
0%
2
33%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
9%
0
0%
3
33%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
31
Regents Diploma
29
94%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
7
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
42%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
6%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
9%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
25
Regents Diploma
25
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
7
28%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
10
40%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
6
Regents Diploma
4
67%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
50%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
33%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
33%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
5
4%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
6%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
5
4%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
6%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
5
4%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
6%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
5
4%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
6%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
5
4%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
6%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
5
4%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
6%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
4
12%
4
16%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
14
41%
12
48%
2
22%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
0
0%
1
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
13
38%
9
36%
4
44%
TO ADULT SERVICES
2
6%
0
0%
2
22%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
4
12%
To Two-Year College
14
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
13
38%
To Adult Services
2
6%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
4
16%
To Two-Year College
12
48%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
9
36%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
2
22%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
11%
To Employment
4
44%
To Adult Services
2
22%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
4
12%
4
16%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
14
41%
12
48%
2
22%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
0
0%
1
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
13
38%
9
36%
4
44%
TO ADULT SERVICES
2
6%
0
0%
2
22%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
4
12%
To Two-Year College
14
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
13
38%
To Adult Services
2
6%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
4
16%
To Two-Year College
12
48%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
9
36%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
2
22%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
11%
To Employment
4
44%
To Adult Services
2
22%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
4
12%
4
16%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
14
41%
12
48%
2
22%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
0
0%
1
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
13
38%
9
36%
4
44%
TO ADULT SERVICES
2
6%
0
0%
2
22%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
4
12%
To Two-Year College
14
41%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
13
38%
To Adult Services
2
6%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
4
16%
To Two-Year College
12
48%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
9
36%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
2
22%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
11%
To Employment
4
44%
To Adult Services
2
22%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
9
36%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
10
40%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
9
36%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
10
40%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
5
33%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
6
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
9
36%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
10
40%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
7
58%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
3
23%
LEVEL 3
7
54%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
9
36%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
10
40%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
23
2
25
10
15
25
12
13
25
PROFICIENT
44%
_%
_%
44%
50%
40%
44%
25%
62%
44%
LEVEL 1
9
36%
_
_
_
_
9
36%
4
40%
5
33%
9
36%
7
58%
2
15%
9
36%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
_
_
_
_
5
20%
1
10%
4
27%
5
20%
2
17%
3
23%
5
20%
LEVEL 3
10
40%
_
_
_
_
10
40%
4
40%
6
40%
10
40%
3
25%
7
54%
10
40%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
10%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
8%
1
4%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 282
All Students
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
18
58%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
18
58%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
7
54%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
11
61%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
18
58%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
13
68%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
18
58%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
28
3
31
13
18
31
19
12
31
PROFICIENT
13%
_%
_%
13%
15%
11%
13%
16%
8%
13%
LEVEL 1
18
58%
_
_
_
_
18
58%
7
54%
11
61%
18
58%
13
68%
5
42%
18
58%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
_
_
_
_
9
29%
4
31%
5
28%
9
29%
3
16%
6
50%
9
29%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
0
0%
2
11%
2
6%
2
11%
0
0%
2
6%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
2
15%
0
0%
2
6%
1
5%
1
8%
2
6%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 285
All Students
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
22
51%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
16
43%
LEVEL 2
14
38%
LEVEL 3
6
16%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
22
51%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
13
57%
LEVEL 2
6
26%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
9
45%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
22
51%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
15
54%
LEVEL 2
9
32%
LEVEL 3
3
11%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
7
47%
LEVEL 2
5
33%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
22
51%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
43
37
6
1
1
41
43
23
20
43
28
15
43
PROFICIENT
16%
19%
0%
_%
_%
_%
16%
17%
15%
16%
14%
20%
16%
LEVEL 1
22
51%
16
43%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
51%
13
57%
9
45%
22
51%
15
54%
7
47%
22
51%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
14
38%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
33%
6
26%
8
40%
14
33%
9
32%
5
33%
14
33%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
6
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
14%
3
13%
3
15%
6
14%
3
11%
3
20%
6
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 288
All Students
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
10
29%
LEVEL 2
19
54%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
18
62%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
5
83%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
10
29%
LEVEL 2
19
54%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
3
20%
LEVEL 2
11
73%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Male
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
10
29%
LEVEL 2
19
54%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
4
21%
LEVEL 2
12
63%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
6
38%
LEVEL 2
7
44%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
10
29%
LEVEL 2
19
54%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
35
29
6
1
1
33
35
15
20
35
19
16
35
PROFICIENT
17%
21%
0%
_%
_%
_%
17%
7%
25%
17%
16%
19%
17%
LEVEL 1
10
29%
5
17%
5
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
29%
3
20%
7
35%
10
29%
4
21%
6
38%
10
29%
LEVEL 2
19
54%
18
62%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
54%
11
73%
8
40%
19
54%
12
63%
7
44%
19
54%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
3
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
9%
0
0%
3
15%
3
9%
2
11%
1
6%
3
9%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
3
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
9%
1
7%
2
10%
3
9%
1
5%
2
13%
3
9%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
19
63%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
19
63%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
8
62%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
5
29%
LEVEL 2
11
65%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
19
63%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
5
33%
LEVEL 2
9
60%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
3
20%
LEVEL 2
10
67%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
19
63%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
26
4
30
13
17
30
15
15
30
PROFICIENT
10%
_%
_%
10%
15%
6%
10%
7%
13%
10%
LEVEL 1
8
27%
_
_
_
_
8
27%
3
23%
5
29%
8
27%
5
33%
3
20%
8
27%
LEVEL 2
19
63%
_
_
_
_
19
63%
8
62%
11
65%
19
63%
9
60%
10
67%
19
63%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
1
8%
1
6%
2
7%
1
7%
1
7%
2
7%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
8%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
7%
1
3%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
11
39%
LEVEL 3
10
36%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
11
39%
LEVEL 3
10
36%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
11
39%
LEVEL 3
10
36%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
4
25%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
7
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
11
39%
LEVEL 3
10
36%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
25
3
28
18
10
28
16
12
28
PROFICIENT
39%
_%
_%
39%
50%
20%
39%
44%
33%
39%
LEVEL 1
6
21%
_
_
_
_
6
21%
2
11%
4
40%
6
21%
4
25%
2
17%
6
21%
LEVEL 2
11
39%
_
_
_
_
11
39%
7
39%
4
40%
11
39%
5
31%
6
50%
11
39%
LEVEL 3
10
36%
_
_
_
_
10
36%
8
44%
2
20%
10
36%
7
44%
3
25%
10
36%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
6%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
8%
1
4%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 312
All Students
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
6
24%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
6
24%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
6
40%
LEVEL 4
4
27%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
6
24%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
5
38%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
6
24%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
23
2
25
10
15
25
12
13
25
PROFICIENT
56%
_%
_%
56%
40%
67%
56%
42%
69%
56%
LEVEL 1
6
24%
_
_
_
_
6
24%
2
20%
4
27%
6
24%
4
33%
2
15%
6
24%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
_
_
_
_
5
20%
4
40%
1
7%
5
20%
3
25%
2
15%
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
_
_
_
_
8
32%
2
20%
6
40%
8
32%
4
33%
4
31%
8
32%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
_
_
_
_
6
24%
2
20%
4
27%
6
24%
1
8%
5
38%
6
24%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
13
42%
LEVEL 2
15
48%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
13
42%
LEVEL 2
15
48%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
9
50%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
13
42%
LEVEL 2
15
48%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
8
42%
LEVEL 2
10
53%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
5
42%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
13
42%
LEVEL 2
15
48%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
28
3
31
13
18
31
19
12
31
PROFICIENT
10%
_%
_%
10%
15%
6%
10%
5%
17%
10%
LEVEL 1
13
42%
_
_
_
_
13
42%
5
38%
8
44%
13
42%
8
42%
5
42%
13
42%
LEVEL 2
15
48%
_
_
_
_
15
48%
6
46%
9
50%
15
48%
10
53%
5
42%
15
48%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
_
_
_
_
3
10%
2
15%
1
6%
3
10%
1
5%
2
17%
3
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
24
57%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
18
50%
LEVEL 2
14
39%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
24
57%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
14
64%
LEVEL 2
5
23%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
10
50%
LEVEL 2
9
45%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
24
57%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
16
59%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
3
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
8
53%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
24
57%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
42
36
6
1
1
40
42
22
20
42
27
15
42
PROFICIENT
10%
11%
0%
_%
_%
_%
10%
14%
5%
10%
11%
7%
10%
LEVEL 1
24
57%
18
50%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
57%
14
64%
10
50%
24
57%
16
59%
8
53%
24
57%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
14
39%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
33%
5
23%
9
45%
14
33%
8
30%
6
40%
14
33%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
4
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
10%
3
14%
1
5%
4
10%
3
11%
1
7%
4
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
13
38%
LEVEL 2
19
56%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
9
31%
LEVEL 2
18
62%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
4
80%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
13
38%
LEVEL 2
19
56%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
8
57%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
11
55%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
13
38%
LEVEL 2
19
56%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
6
33%
LEVEL 2
10
56%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
7
44%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
13
38%
LEVEL 2
19
56%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
29
5
1
1
32
34
14
20
34
18
16
34
PROFICIENT
6%
7%
0%
_%
_%
_%
6%
7%
5%
6%
11%
0%
6%
LEVEL 1
13
38%
9
31%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
38%
5
36%
8
40%
13
38%
6
33%
7
44%
13
38%
LEVEL 2
19
56%
18
62%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
56%
8
57%
11
55%
19
56%
10
56%
9
56%
19
56%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
2
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
1
7%
1
5%
2
6%
2
11%
0
0%
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 292
All Students
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
13
43%
LEVEL 2
16
53%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
13
43%
LEVEL 2
16
53%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
8
62%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
8
47%
LEVEL 2
8
47%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
13
43%
LEVEL 2
16
53%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
8
53%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
5
33%
LEVEL 2
9
60%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
13
43%
LEVEL 2
16
53%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
26
4
30
13
17
30
15
15
30
PROFICIENT
3%
_%
_%
3%
0%
6%
3%
0%
7%
3%
LEVEL 1
13
43%
_
_
_
_
13
43%
5
38%
8
47%
13
43%
8
53%
5
33%
13
43%
LEVEL 2
16
53%
_
_
_
_
16
53%
8
62%
8
47%
16
53%
7
47%
9
60%
16
53%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
6%
1
3%
0
0%
1
7%
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 285
All Students
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
11
39%
LEVEL 2
17
61%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
11
39%
LEVEL 2
17
61%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
6
33%
LEVEL 2
12
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
11
39%
LEVEL 2
17
61%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
7
44%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
8
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
11
39%
LEVEL 2
17
61%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
25
3
28
18
10
28
16
12
28
PROFICIENT
0%
_%
_%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
LEVEL 1
11
39%
_
_
_
_
11
39%
6
33%
5
50%
11
39%
7
44%
4
33%
11
39%
LEVEL 2
17
61%
_
_
_
_
17
61%
12
67%
5
50%
17
61%
9
56%
8
67%
17
61%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 84
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
19
63%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
19
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
6
46%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
13
76%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
19
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
6
32%
LEVEL 4
12
63%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
19
63%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
27
3
30
13
17
30
19
11
30
PROFICIENT
93%
_%
_%
93%
85%
100%
93%
95%
91%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
2
15%
0
0%
2
7%
1
5%
1
9%
2
7%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
_
_
_
_
9
30%
5
38%
4
24%
9
30%
6
32%
3
27%
9
30%
LEVEL 4
19
63%
_
_
_
_
19
63%
6
46%
13
76%
19
63%
12
63%
7
64%
19
63%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 71
All Students
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
10
63%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
11
73%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
6
55%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
23
3
26
16
10
26
15
11
26
PROFICIENT
73%
_%
_%
73%
69%
80%
73%
80%
64%
73%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
_
_
_
_
7
27%
5
31%
2
20%
7
27%
3
20%
4
36%
7
27%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
_
_
_
_
17
65%
10
63%
7
70%
17
65%
11
73%
6
55%
17
65%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
_
_
_
_
2
8%
1
6%
1
10%
2
8%
1
7%
1
9%
2
8%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
LEVEL 4
9
35%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
57%
LEVEL 4
9
43%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
LEVEL 4
9
35%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
63%
LEVEL 4
5
31%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
4
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
LEVEL 4
9
35%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
61%
LEVEL 4
7
39%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
LEVEL 4
9
35%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
21
5
26
16
10
26
8
18
26
PROFICIENT
92%
100%
60%
92%
94%
90%
92%
75%
100%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
12
57%
3
60%
15
58%
10
63%
5
50%
15
58%
4
50%
11
61%
15
58%
LEVEL 4
9
35%
9
43%
0
0%
9
35%
5
31%
4
40%
9
35%
2
25%
7
39%
9
35%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
69%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
71%
LEVEL 4
6
29%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
69%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
63%
LEVEL 4
5
31%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
80%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
69%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
72%
LEVEL 4
5
28%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
69%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
21
5
26
16
10
26
8
18
26
PROFICIENT
92%
100%
60%
92%
94%
90%
92%
75%
100%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
69%
15
71%
3
60%
18
69%
10
63%
8
80%
18
69%
5
63%
13
72%
18
69%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
6
29%
0
0%
6
23%
5
31%
1
10%
6
23%
1
13%
5
28%
6
23%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
81%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
81%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
83%
LEVEL 4
3
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
21
5
26
16
10
26
8
18
26
PROFICIENT
92%
100%
60%
92%
94%
90%
92%
75%
100%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
17
81%
3
60%
20
77%
13
81%
7
70%
20
77%
5
63%
15
83%
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
4
19%
0
0%
4
15%
2
13%
2
20%
4
15%
1
13%
3
17%
4
15%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
81%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
81%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
75%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
78%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
21
5
26
16
10
26
8
18
26
PROFICIENT
92%
100%
60%
92%
94%
90%
92%
75%
100%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
77%
17
81%
3
60%
20
77%
13
81%
7
70%
20
77%
6
75%
14
78%
20
77%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
4
19%
0
0%
4
15%
2
13%
2
20%
4
15%
0
0%
4
22%
4
15%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
52%
LEVEL 4
10
48%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
63%
LEVEL 4
5
31%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
5
50%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
8
44%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
21
5
26
16
10
26
8
18
26
PROFICIENT
92%
100%
60%
92%
94%
90%
92%
75%
100%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
11
52%
3
60%
14
54%
10
63%
4
40%
14
54%
4
50%
10
56%
14
54%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
10
48%
0
0%
10
38%
5
31%
5
50%
10
38%
2
25%
8
44%
10
38%
Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
24
4
0
1
0
0
27
0
28
17
11
28
0
11
17
0
28
55
27
96%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
27
96%
17
100%
10
91%
27
96%
0
0%
10
91%
17
100%
0
0%
27
96%
65
25
89%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
25
89%
17
100%
8
73%
25
89%
0
0%
9
82%
16
94%
0
0%
25
89%
85
12
43%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
12
43%
9
53%
3
27%
12
43%
0
0%
5
45%
7
41%
0
0%
12
43%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
25
89%
85
12
43%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
25
89%
85
12
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
17
100%
85
9
53%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
8
73%
85
3
27%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
25
89%
85
12
43%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
9
82%
85
5
45%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
16
94%
85
7
41%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
25
89%
85
12
43%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
31
3
0
0
0
0
34
0
14
20
34
0
20
14
0
34
55
31
91%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
31
91%
0
0%
13
93%
18
90%
31
91%
0
0%
18
90%
13
93%
0
0%
31
91%
65
29
85%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
29
85%
0
0%
13
93%
16
80%
29
85%
0
0%
17
85%
12
86%
0
0%
29
85%
85
3
9%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
9%
0
0%
2
14%
1
5%
3
9%
0
0%
3
15%
0
0%
0
0%
3
9%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
29
85%
85
3
9%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
29
85%
85
3
9%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
93%
65
13
93%
85
2
14%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
90%
65
16
80%
85
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
29
85%
85
3
9%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
90%
65
17
85%
85
3
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
93%
65
12
86%
85
0
0%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
91%
65
29
85%
85
3
9%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
13
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
9
4
13
0
4
9
0
13
55
13
100%
13
100%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
13
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
13
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
13
100%
65
13
100%
13
100%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
13
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
13
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
13
100%
85
3
23%
3
23%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
23%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
3
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
3
23%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
3
23%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
3
23%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
3
23%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
15
15
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
10
5
15
0
7
8
0
15
55
15
100%
15
100%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
15
100%
0
0%
10
100%
5
100%
15
100%
0
0%
7
100%
8
100%
0
0%
15
100%
65
14
93%
14
93%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
14
93%
0
0%
9
90%
5
100%
14
93%
0
0%
7
100%
7
88%
0
0%
14
93%
85
6
40%
6
40%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
40%
0
0%
3
30%
3
60%
6
40%
0
0%
3
43%
3
38%
0
0%
6
40%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
14
93%
85
6
40%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
14
93%
85
6
40%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
14
93%
85
6
40%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
9
90%
85
3
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
14
93%
85
6
40%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
3
43%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
3
38%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
14
93%
85
6
40%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
31
3
0
0
0
0
34
0
21
13
34
0
14
20
0
34
55
29
85%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
29
85%
0
0%
20
95%
9
69%
29
85%
0
0%
12
86%
17
85%
0
0%
29
85%
65
28
82%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
28
82%
0
0%
19
90%
9
69%
28
82%
0
0%
11
79%
17
85%
0
0%
28
82%
85
8
24%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
8
24%
0
0%
3
14%
5
38%
8
24%
0
0%
4
29%
4
20%
0
0%
8
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
28
82%
85
8
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
28
82%
85
8
24%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
19
90%
85
3
14%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
69%
65
9
69%
85
5
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
28
82%
85
8
24%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
11
79%
85
4
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
17
85%
85
4
20%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
28
82%
85
8
24%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
31
3
0
1
0
0
33
0
34
21
13
34
0
14
20
0
34
55
29
85%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
29
85%
19
90%
10
77%
29
85%
0
0%
10
71%
19
95%
0
0%
29
85%
65
26
76%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
26
76%
17
81%
9
69%
26
76%
0
0%
9
64%
17
85%
0
0%
26
76%
85
10
29%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
10
29%
7
33%
3
23%
10
29%
0
0%
4
29%
6
30%
0
0%
10
29%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
26
76%
85
10
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
26
76%
85
10
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
17
81%
85
7
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
77%
65
9
69%
85
3
23%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
26
76%
85
10
29%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
71%
65
9
64%
85
4
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
17
85%
85
6
30%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
26
76%
85
10
29%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
28
3
0
0
0
0
31
0
12
19
31
0
19
12
0
31
55
31
100%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
31
100%
0
0%
12
100%
19
100%
31
100%
0
0%
19
100%
12
100%
0
0%
31
100%
65
31
100%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
31
100%
0
0%
12
100%
19
100%
31
100%
0
0%
19
100%
12
100%
0
0%
31
100%
85
13
42%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
13
42%
0
0%
5
42%
8
42%
13
42%
0
0%
7
37%
6
50%
0
0%
13
42%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
31
100%
85
13
42%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
31
100%
85
13
42%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
5
42%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
19
100%
85
8
42%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
31
100%
85
13
42%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
19
100%
85
7
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
6
50%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
31
100%
85
13
42%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
23
1
0
0
0
0
24
0
14
10
24
0
11
13
0
24
55
24
100%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
24
100%
0
0%
14
100%
10
100%
24
100%
0
0%
11
100%
13
100%
0
0%
24
100%
65
22
92%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
22
92%
0
0%
13
93%
9
90%
22
92%
0
0%
9
82%
13
100%
0
0%
22
92%
85
7
29%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
7
29%
0
0%
3
21%
4
40%
7
29%
0
0%
4
36%
3
23%
0
0%
7
29%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
22
92%
85
7
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
22
92%
85
7
29%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
13
93%
85
3
21%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
9
90%
85
4
40%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
22
92%
85
7
29%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
9
82%
85
4
36%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
3
23%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
22
92%
85
7
29%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
8
8
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
7
1
8
0
3
5
0
8
55
8
100%
8
100%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
8
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
8
100%
65
7
88%
7
88%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
7
88%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
88%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
7
88%
85
2
25%
2
25%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
25%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
2
25%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
2
25%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
2
25%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
2
25%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
2
25%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
3
3
6
0
2
4
0
6
55
6
100%
6
100%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
6
100%
65
6
100%
6
100%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
6
100%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
0
0%
Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
Reading
1
_
Writing
1
_
Math
1
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
_
1
_
1
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
General Education
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Black or African American
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Hispanic or Latino
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
White
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Multiracial
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Small Group Total
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Female
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Male
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Not Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
0
1
1
2
188
0
24
0
109
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
0
1
1
2
182
0
24
0
104
PI
87
―
―
―
―
87
―
―
―
78
EAMO
74
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
56
Safe Harbor Target
74
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
56
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
PI
87
EAMO
74
Safe Harbor Target
74
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
188
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
PI
87
EAMO
97
Safe Harbor Target
97
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
24
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
109
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
PI
78
EAMO
56
Safe Harbor Target
56
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
191
191
190
4
192
168
192
83
100
92
0
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
185
185
184
4
186
162
186
82
97
89
0
186
PI
87
87
87
86
―
87
96
87
98
80
93
―
87
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
PI
87
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
191
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
185
PI
87
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
191
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
185
PI
87
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
190
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
86
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
PI
87
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
96
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
PI
87
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
83
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
82
PI
98
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
100
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
97
PI
80
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
92
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
93
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
PI
87
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
0
1
1
2
188
0
24
0
109
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
0
1
1
2
180
0
23
0
102
PI
72
―
―
―
―
73
―
―
―
67
EAMO
71
―
―
―
―
91
―
―
―
52
Safe Harbor Target
71
―
―
―
―
80
―
―
―
52
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
72
EAMO
71
Safe Harbor Target
71
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
188
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
180
PI
73
EAMO
91
Safe Harbor Target
80
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
109
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
102
PI
67
EAMO
52
Safe Harbor Target
52
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
191
191
190
4
192
168
192
83
100
92
0
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
99%
99%
100%
100%
98%
―
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
183
183
182
4
184
161
184
82
97
87
0
184
PI
72
73
73
72
―
72
80
72
79
73
71
―
72
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
72
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
191
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
183
PI
73
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
191
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
183
PI
73
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
190
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
PI
72
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
72
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
161
PI
80
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
72
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
83
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
82
PI
79
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
100
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
97
PI
73
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
92
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
87
PI
71
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
72
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
0
0
0
0
60
0
6
0
36
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
―
―
―
―
93%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
0
0
0
0
54
0
6
0
33
PI
183
―
―
―
―
183
―
―
―
188
EAMO
168
―
―
―
―
179
―
―
―
154
Progress Target
168
―
―
―
―
179
―
―
―
154
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
EAMO
168
Progress Target
168
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
EAMO
179
Progress Target
179
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
36
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
188
EAMO
154
Progress Target
154
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
60
60
60
0
60
54
60
24
28
32
0
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
93%
93%
93%
―
93%
93%
93%
―
―
―
―
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
54
54
54
0
54
48
54
21
26
28
0
54
PI
183
183
183
183
―
183
185
183
―
―
―
―
183
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
54
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48
PI
185
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
28
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
26
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
183
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
31
0
0
0
0
31
0
6
0
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
0**
0**
0**
0**
53**
0**
11**
0**
23**
PI
166**
―**
―**
―**
―**
166**
―**
―**
―**
―**
EAMO
150
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
150
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
EAMO
150
Safe Harbor Target
150
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
EAMO
163
Safe Harbor Target
163
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
11**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
23**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
31
31
31
31
0
31
25
31
20
16
15
0
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
53**
53**
53**
0**
53**
42**
53**
30**
26**
27**
0**
53**
PI
166**
166**
166**
166**
―
166**
181**
166**
173**
―
―
―
166**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
General Education
12th Graders
25
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
42**
PI
181**
English Proficient
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
20
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
30**
PI
173**
Male
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
26**
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
27**
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
166**
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. **The number of 2009 accountability cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2009 and 2008 accountability cohort members were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
31
0
0
0
0
31
0
6
0
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
0**
0**
0**
0**
53**
0**
11**
0**
23**
PI
134**
―**
―**
―**
―**
134**
―**
―**
―**
―**
EAMO
129
―
―
―
―
145
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
129
―
―
―
―
144
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
EAMO
129
Safe Harbor Target
129
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
144
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
11**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
23**
PI
―**
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
31
31
31
31
0
31
25
31
20
16
15
0
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
53**
53**
53**
0**
53**
42**
53**
30**
26**
27**
0**
53**
PI
134**
134**
134**
134**
―
134**
150**
134**
143**
―
―
―
134**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
General Education
12th Graders
25
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
42**
PI
150**
English Proficient
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
20
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
30**
PI
143**
Male
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
26**
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
27**
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0**
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53**
PI
134**
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. **The number of 2009 accountability cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2009 and 2008 accountability cohort members were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
87
―
―
―
―
87
―
―
―
78
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
72
―
―
―
―
73
―
―
―
67
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
80
0
0
0
0
80
0
0
0
73
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
87
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
72
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
80
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
87
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
73
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
80
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
78
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
67
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
73
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
NO
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
0
0
0
0
32
0
6
0
19
Graduation Rate
69%
―
―
―
―
69%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
69%
―
―
―
―
71%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
69%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
71%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
19
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
0
0
1
0
33
0
8
0
10
Graduation Rate
71%
―
―
―
―
73%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
71%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
33
Graduation Rate
73%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
32
32
32
0
32
26
32
13
20
12
0
32
Graduation Rate
69%
69%
69%
69%
―
69%
―
69%
―
―
―
―
69%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
34
33
34
1
34
26
34
24
21
13
0
34
Graduation Rate
71%
71%
73%
71%
―
71%
―
71%
―
―
―
―
71%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
20
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
69%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
71%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
71%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
33
Graduation Rate
73%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
71%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
71%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
71%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
71%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
13%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
13%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
28%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
