Skip to Content
Main content

CITY HONORS SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

High School Completers (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 108
  • 102
  • 6
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 107
  • 102
  • 5
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 107
  • 100%
  • 102
  • 100%
  • 5
  • 100%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 103
  • 96%
  • 101
  • 99%
  • 2
  • 40%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

108

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

107

Regents Diploma

107

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

103

96%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

1%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

102

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

102

Regents Diploma

102

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

101

99%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

6

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

5

Regents Diploma

5

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

2

40%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

17%

of Completers

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 108
  • 102
  • 6
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 107
  • 102
  • 5
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 107
  • 100%
  • 102
  • 100%
  • 5
  • 100%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 103
  • 96%
  • 101
  • 99%
  • 2
  • 40%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

108

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

107

Regents Diploma

107

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

103

96%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

1%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

102

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

102

Regents Diploma

102

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

101

99%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

6

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

5

Regents Diploma

5

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

2

40%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

17%

of Completers

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 108
  • 102
  • 6
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 107
  • 102
  • 5
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 107
  • 100%
  • 102
  • 100%
  • 5
  • 100%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 103
  • 96%
  • 101
  • 99%
  • 2
  • 40%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

108

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

107

Regents Diploma

107

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

103

96%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

1%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

102

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

102

Regents Diploma

102

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

101

99%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

6

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

5

Regents Diploma

5

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

2

40%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

17%

of Completers

High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

GROUP
DROPPED OUT
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

GROUP
DROPPED OUT
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 96
  • 89%
  • 92
  • 90%
  • 4
  • 67%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 9
  • 8%
  • 8
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 17%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

To Four-Year College

96

89%

To Two-Year College

9

8%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

1%

To Employment

1

1%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

1%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

General Education

To Four-Year College

92

90%

To Two-Year College

8

8%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

1%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

1%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

4

67%

To Two-Year College

1

17%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

1

17%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 96
  • 89%
  • 92
  • 90%
  • 4
  • 67%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 9
  • 8%
  • 8
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 17%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

To Four-Year College

96

89%

To Two-Year College

9

8%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

1%

To Employment

1

1%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

1%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

General Education

To Four-Year College

92

90%

To Two-Year College

8

8%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

1%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

1%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

4

67%

To Two-Year College

1

17%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

1

17%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 96
  • 89%
  • 92
  • 90%
  • 4
  • 67%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 9
  • 8%
  • 8
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 17%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

To Four-Year College

96

89%

To Two-Year College

9

8%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

1%

To Employment

1

1%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

1%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

General Education

To Four-Year College

92

90%

To Two-Year College

8

8%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

1%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

1%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

4

67%

To Two-Year College

1

17%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

1

17%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP
MADE AYP
All Students

MADE AYP

YES

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP

YES

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP

―

White

MADE AYP

YES

Multiracial

MADE AYP

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 102
  • 0
  • 25
  • 4
  • 4
  • 69
  • 0
  • 4
  • 0
  • 31
Graduation Rate
  • 98%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 97%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 94%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
98%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
25
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • ―
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 114
  • 0
  • 31
  • 7
  • 4
  • 72
  • 0
  • 4
  • 0
  • 34
Graduation Rate
  • 99%
  • ―
  • 97%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 100%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 97%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 80%
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
99%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability

GROUP
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 102
  • 77
  • 98
  • 98
  • 33
  • 102
  • 98
  • 102
  • 71
  • 54
  • 48
  • 0
  • 102
Graduation Rate
  • 98%
  • 97%
  • 98%
  • 98%
  • 100%
  • 98%
  • 99%
  • 98%
  • 100%
  • 96%
  • 100%
  • ―
  • 98%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 114
  • 83
  • 107
  • 110
  • 42
  • 114
  • 110
  • 114
  • 80
  • 43
  • 71
  • 0
  • 114
Graduation Rate
  • 99%
  • 100%
  • 99%
  • 99%
  • 98%
  • 99%
  • 100%
  • 99%
  • 100%
  • 98%
  • 100%
  • ―
  • 99%

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
Graduation Rate
98%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
33
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
98%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
Graduation Rate
99%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
71
Graduation Rate
100%
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
54
Graduation Rate
96%
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
48
Graduation Rate
100%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
98%

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
99%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
83
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
99%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
110
Graduation Rate
99%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
42
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
99%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
110
Graduation Rate
100%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
99%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
100%
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
43
Graduation Rate
98%
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
71
Graduation Rate
100%
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
99%

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
  • 87%
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
  • 30%
  • Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
  • YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
87%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.