Skip to Content
Main content

HUTCHINSON CENTRAL TECH HIGH SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

High School Completers (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 217
  • 206
  • 11
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 213
  • 206
  • 7
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 213
  • 100%
  • 206
  • 100%
  • 7
  • 100%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 40
  • 19%
  • 39
  • 19%
  • 1
  • 14%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 5
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 14%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 36%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

217

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

213

Regents Diploma

213

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

40

19%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

6

3%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

4

2%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

206

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

206

Regents Diploma

206

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

39

19%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

5

2%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

11

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

7

Regents Diploma

7

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

1

14%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

1

14%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

4

36%

of Completers

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 217
  • 206
  • 11
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 213
  • 206
  • 7
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 213
  • 100%
  • 206
  • 100%
  • 7
  • 100%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 40
  • 19%
  • 39
  • 19%
  • 1
  • 14%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 5
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 14%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 36%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

217

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

213

Regents Diploma

213

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

40

19%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

6

3%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

4

2%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

206

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

206

Regents Diploma

206

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

39

19%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

5

2%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

11

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

7

Regents Diploma

7

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

1

14%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

1

14%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

4

36%

of Completers

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 217
  • 206
  • 11
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 213
  • 206
  • 7
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 213
  • 100%
  • 206
  • 100%
  • 7
  • 100%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 40
  • 19%
  • 39
  • 19%
  • 1
  • 14%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 5
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 14%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 36%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

217

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

213

Regents Diploma

213

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

40

19%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

6

3%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

4

2%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

206

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

206

Regents Diploma

206

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

39

19%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

5

2%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

11

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

7

Regents Diploma

7

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

1

14%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

1

14%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

4

36%

of Completers

High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
  • 21
  • 2%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • 1
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • 22
  • 2%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

DROPPED OUT

21

2%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

1

0%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

22

2%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

GROUP
DROPPED OUT
  • 21
  • 2%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • 1
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • 22
  • 2%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

DROPPED OUT

21

2%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

1

0%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

22

2%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

GROUP
DROPPED OUT
  • 21
  • 2%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • 1
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • 22
  • 2%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

DROPPED OUT

21

2%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

1

0%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

22

2%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 118
  • 54%
  • 115
  • 56%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 72
  • 33%
  • 69
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 5
  • 2%
  • 2
  • 1%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 9
  • 4%
  • 9
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 2
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 18%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 1
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

To Four-Year College

118

54%

To Two-Year College

72

33%

To Other Post-Secondary

5

2%

To the Military

6

3%

To Employment

9

4%

To Adult Services

2

1%

To Other Known Plans

1

0%

Plan Unknown

4

2%

General Education

To Four-Year College

115

56%

To Two-Year College

69

33%

To Other Post-Secondary

2

1%

To the Military

6

3%

To Employment

9

4%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

0%

Plan Unknown

4

2%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

3

27%

To Two-Year College

3

27%

To Other Post-Secondary

3

27%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

2

18%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 118
  • 54%
  • 115
  • 56%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 72
  • 33%
  • 69
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 5
  • 2%
  • 2
  • 1%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 9
  • 4%
  • 9
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 2
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 18%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 1
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

To Four-Year College

118

54%

To Two-Year College

72

33%

To Other Post-Secondary

5

2%

To the Military

6

3%

To Employment

9

4%

To Adult Services

2

1%

To Other Known Plans

1

0%

Plan Unknown

4

2%

General Education

To Four-Year College

115

56%

To Two-Year College

69

33%

To Other Post-Secondary

2

1%

To the Military

6

3%

To Employment

9

4%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

0%

Plan Unknown

4

2%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

3

27%

To Two-Year College

3

27%

To Other Post-Secondary

3

27%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

2

18%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 118
  • 54%
  • 115
  • 56%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 72
  • 33%
  • 69
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 5
  • 2%
  • 2
  • 1%
  • 3
  • 27%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 6
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 9
  • 4%
  • 9
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 2
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 18%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 1
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

To Four-Year College

118

54%

To Two-Year College

72

33%

To Other Post-Secondary

5

2%

To the Military

6

3%

To Employment

9

4%

To Adult Services

2

1%

To Other Known Plans

1

0%

Plan Unknown

4

2%

General Education

To Four-Year College

115

56%

To Two-Year College

69

33%

To Other Post-Secondary

2

1%

To the Military

6

3%

To Employment

9

4%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

1

0%

Plan Unknown

4

2%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

3

27%

To Two-Year College

3

27%

To Other Post-Secondary

3

27%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

2

18%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP
MADE AYP
All Students

MADE AYP

YES

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP

YES

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP

―

White

MADE AYP

YES

Multiracial

MADE AYP

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • ―
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • NO
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 285
  • 10
  • 111
  • 24
  • 14
  • 124
  • 2
  • 15
  • 2
  • 207
Graduation Rate
  • 80%
  • ―
  • 84%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 77%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 80%
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
Graduation Rate
80%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
111
Graduation Rate
84%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
77%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
207
Graduation Rate
80%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • ―
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 286
  • 5
  • 138
  • 29
  • 13
  • 101
  • 0
  • 17
  • 0
  • 181
Graduation Rate
  • 85%
  • ―
  • 87%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 82%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 86%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 80%
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
87%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
29
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
101
Graduation Rate
82%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
181
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability

GROUP
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 275
  • 174
  • 261
  • 271
  • 161
  • 283
  • 270
  • 283
  • 78
  • 155
  • 130
  • 0
  • 285
Graduation Rate
  • 80%
  • 78%
  • 81%
  • 79%
  • 82%
  • 80%
  • 83%
  • 80%
  • 79%
  • 76%
  • 85%
  • ―
  • 80%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 281
  • 148
  • 257
  • 273
  • 185
  • 286
  • 269
  • 286
  • 105
  • 155
  • 131
  • 0
  • 286
Graduation Rate
  • 86%
  • 84%
  • 85%
  • 85%
  • 87%
  • 85%
  • 88%
  • 85%
  • 84%
  • 82%
  • 89%
  • ―
  • 85%

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
275
Graduation Rate
80%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
174
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
261
Graduation Rate
81%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
271
Graduation Rate
79%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
161
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
283
Graduation Rate
80%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
270
Graduation Rate
83%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
283
Graduation Rate
80%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
78
Graduation Rate
79%
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
155
Graduation Rate
76%
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
130
Graduation Rate
85%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
Graduation Rate
80%

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
281
Graduation Rate
86%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
148
Graduation Rate
84%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
257
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
273
Graduation Rate
85%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
185
Graduation Rate
87%
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
85%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
269
Graduation Rate
88%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
105
Graduation Rate
84%
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
155
Graduation Rate
82%
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
131
Graduation Rate
89%
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
85%

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
  • 21%
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
  • 30%
  • Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
  • NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
21%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.