COHOES CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
COHOES CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
1,852
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
952
51%
FEMALE
900
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
5
162
121
17
1,457
90
PERCENT
0%
9%
7%
1%
79%
5%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
28
2%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
272
15%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
1,271
69%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
171
157
153
131
144
133
148
10
137
139
152
130
115
113
19
PERCENT
9%
8%
8%
7%
7%
7%
8%
1%
7%
7%
8%
7%
6%
6%
1%
COHOES CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 Enrollment: 1,852
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
952
51%
FEMALE
900
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
5
0%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
162
9%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
121
7%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
17
1%
WHITE
1,457
79%
MULTIRACIAL
90
5%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
28
2%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
272
15%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
1,271
69%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
171
9%
1ST GRADE
157
8%
2ND GRADE
153
8%
3RD GRADE
131
7%
4TH GRADE
144
7%
5TH GRADE
133
7%
6TH GRADE
148
8%
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
10
1%
7TH GRADE
137
7%
8TH GRADE
139
7%
9TH GRADE
152
8%
10TH GRADE
130
7%
11TH GRADE
115
6%
12TH GRADE
113
6%
UNGRADED SECONDARY
19
1%
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
27
22
27
28
27
18
16
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
27
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
27
Grade 8 Social Studies
28
Grade 10 English
27
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
1,107
60%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
129
7%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
Eligible for Free Lunch
1,107
60%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
129
7%
ATTENDANCE (2013 - 14)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
93%
Attendance (2013 - 14)
Annual Attendance Rate
93%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2013 - 14)
161
8%
Student Suspensions (2013 - 14)
Student Suspensions
161
8%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
27%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
27%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
7%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
6
2
22
54
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
6
Assistant Principals
2
Other Professional Staff
22
Paraprofessionals
54
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
166
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
2%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
3%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
18%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
332
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
2%
Total Number of Classes
552
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 166
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
2%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
3%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
18%
Total Number of Core Classes
332
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
2%
Total Number of Classes
552
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
127
113
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
122
113
9
REGENTS DIPLOMA
117
96%
112
99%
5
56%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
40
33%
40
35%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
4
3%
4
4%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
4%
1
1%
4
44%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
4%
0
0%
5
36%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
127
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
122
Regents Diploma
117
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
40
33%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
113
Regents Diploma
112
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
40
35%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
9
Regents Diploma
5
56%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
44%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
36%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
127
113
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
122
113
9
REGENTS DIPLOMA
117
96%
112
99%
5
56%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
40
33%
40
35%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
4
3%
4
4%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
4%
1
1%
4
44%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
4%
0
0%
5
36%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
127
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
122
Regents Diploma
117
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
40
33%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
113
Regents Diploma
112
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
40
35%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
9
Regents Diploma
5
56%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
44%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
36%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
127
113
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
122
113
9
REGENTS DIPLOMA
117
96%
112
99%
5
56%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
40
33%
40
35%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
4
3%
4
4%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
4%
1
1%
4
44%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
4%
0
0%
5
36%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
127
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
122
Regents Diploma
117
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
40
33%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
113
Regents Diploma
112
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
40
35%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
9
Regents Diploma
5
56%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
44%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
36%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
24
5%
16
4%
8
10%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
24
5%
16
4%
8
10%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
24
5%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
24
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
16
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
10%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
24
5%
16
4%
8
10%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
24
5%
16
4%
8
10%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
24
5%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
24
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
16
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
10%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
24
5%
16
4%
8
10%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
24
5%
16
4%
8
10%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
24
5%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
24
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
16
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
16
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
10%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
10%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
47
37%
47
42%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
48
38%
41
36%
7
50%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
4
3%
3
3%
1
7%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
2%
1
1%
2
14%
PLANS UNKNOWN
22
17%
18
16%
4
29%
All Students
To Four-Year College
47
37%
To Two-Year College
48
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
4
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
2%
Plan Unknown
22
17%
General Education
To Four-Year College
47
42%
To Two-Year College
41
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
3
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
1%
Plan Unknown
18
16%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
7
50%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
7%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
14%
Plan Unknown
4
29%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
47
37%
47
42%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
48
38%
41
36%
7
50%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
4
3%
3
3%
1
7%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
2%
1
1%
2
14%
PLANS UNKNOWN
22
17%
18
16%
4
29%
All Students
To Four-Year College
47
37%
To Two-Year College
48
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
4
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
2%
Plan Unknown
22
17%
General Education
To Four-Year College
47
42%
To Two-Year College
41
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
3
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
1%
Plan Unknown
18
16%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
7
50%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
7%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
14%
Plan Unknown
4
29%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
47
37%
47
42%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
48
38%
41
36%
7
50%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
4
3%
3
3%
1
7%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
2%
1
1%
2
14%
PLANS UNKNOWN
22
17%
18
16%
4
29%
All Students
To Four-Year College
47
37%
To Two-Year College
48
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
4
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
2%
Plan Unknown
22
17%
General Education
To Four-Year College
47
42%
To Two-Year College
41
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
3
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
1%
Plan Unknown
18
16%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
7
50%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
7%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
14%
Plan Unknown
4
29%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
49
44%
LEVEL 2
36
32%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
41
41%
LEVEL 2
33
33%
LEVEL 3
24
24%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
8
73%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
7
64%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
34
40%
LEVEL 2
29
34%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
30
48%
LEVEL 2
21
34%
LEVEL 3
9
15%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
19
38%
LEVEL 2
15
30%
LEVEL 3
15
30%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
41
51%
LEVEL 2
28
35%
LEVEL 3
10
13%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
8
25%
LEVEL 2
8
25%
LEVEL 3
14
44%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
49
44%
LEVEL 2
36
32%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
112
101
11
1
1
11
6
85
8
8
62
50
109
3
80
32
112
PROFICIENT
24%
27%
0%
_%
_%
9%
_%
26%
38%
13%
18%
32%
_%
_%
14%
50%
24%
LEVEL 1
49
44%
41
41%
8
73%
_
_
_
_
7
64%
_
_
34
40%
3
38%
5
63%
30
48%
19
38%
_
_
_
_
41
51%
8
25%
49
44%
LEVEL 2
36
32%
33
33%
3
27%
_
_
_
_
3
27%
_
_
29
34%
2
25%
2
25%
21
34%
15
30%
_
_
_
_
28
35%
8
25%
36
32%
LEVEL 3
24
21%
24
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
9%
_
_
20
24%
2
25%
1
13%
9
15%
15
30%
_
_
_
_
10
13%
14
44%
24
21%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
3
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
2
2%
1
13%
0
0%
2
3%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
2
6%
3
3%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
39
31%
LEVEL 2
57
45%
LEVEL 3
17
13%
LEVEL 4
13
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
21
20%
LEVEL 2
56
52%
LEVEL 3
17
16%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
18
95%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
8
62%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
4
31%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
White
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
29
32%
LEVEL 2
37
40%
LEVEL 3
15
16%
LEVEL 4
11
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
7
88%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
20
29%
LEVEL 2
29
42%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
19
33%
LEVEL 2
28
49%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
32
37%
LEVEL 2
41
48%
LEVEL 3
9
10%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
16
40%
LEVEL 3
8
20%
LEVEL 4
9
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
39
31%
LEVEL 2
57
45%
LEVEL 3
17
13%
LEVEL 4
13
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
126
107
19
2
13
13
92
6
8
69
57
122
4
86
40
126
PROFICIENT
24%
28%
0%
_%
0%
31%
28%
_%
0%
29%
18%
_%
_%
15%
43%
24%
LEVEL 1
39
31%
21
20%
18
95%
_
_
5
38%
4
31%
29
32%
_
_
1
13%
20
29%
19
33%
_
_
_
_
32
37%
7
18%
39
31%
LEVEL 2
57
45%
56
52%
1
5%
_
_
8
62%
5
38%
37
40%
_
_
7
88%
29
42%
28
49%
_
_
_
_
41
48%
16
40%
57
45%
LEVEL 3
17
13%
17
16%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
15%
15
16%
_
_
0
0%
10
14%
7
12%
_
_
_
_
9
10%
8
20%
17
13%
LEVEL 4
13
10%
13
12%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
15%
11
12%
_
_
0
0%
10
14%
3
5%
_
_
_
_
4
5%
9
23%
13
10%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
58
51%
LEVEL 2
38
34%
LEVEL 3
11
10%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
48
47%
LEVEL 2
38
37%
LEVEL 3
10
10%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
10
91%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
11
73%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
42
47%
LEVEL 2
34
38%
LEVEL 3
8
9%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
22
42%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
7
13%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
36
60%
LEVEL 2
18
30%
LEVEL 3
4
7%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
47
54%
LEVEL 2
28
32%
LEVEL 3
8
9%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
11
42%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
3
12%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
58
51%
LEVEL 2
38
34%
LEVEL 3
11
10%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
113
102
11
1
1
15
6
89
1
9
53
60
111
2
87
26
113
PROFICIENT
15%
16%
9%
_%
_%
7%
_%
15%
_%
33%
21%
10%
_%
_%
14%
19%
15%
LEVEL 1
58
51%
48
47%
10
91%
_
_
_
_
11
73%
_
_
42
47%
_
_
5
56%
22
42%
36
60%
_
_
_
_
47
54%
11
42%
58
51%
LEVEL 2
38
34%
38
37%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
20%
_
_
34
38%
_
_
1
11%
20
38%
18
30%
_
_
_
_
28
32%
10
38%
38
34%
LEVEL 3
11
10%
10
10%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
_
_
8
9%
_
_
2
22%
7
13%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
8
9%
3
12%
11
10%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
6
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
5
6%
_
_
1
11%
4
8%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
4
5%
2
8%
6
5%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 285
All Students
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
52
44%
LEVEL 2
50
42%
LEVEL 3
7
6%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
34
37%
LEVEL 2
43
46%
LEVEL 3
7
8%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
18
72%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
42
46%
LEVEL 2
38
41%
LEVEL 3
4
4%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
17
35%
LEVEL 2
20
41%
LEVEL 3
4
8%
LEVEL 4
8
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
35
51%
LEVEL 2
30
43%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
42
52%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
LEVEL 3
4
5%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
10
27%
LEVEL 2
19
51%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
5
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
52
44%
LEVEL 2
50
42%
LEVEL 3
7
6%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
118
93
25
3
6
9
92
8
9
49
69
116
2
81
37
118
PROFICIENT
14%
17%
0%
_%
_%
11%
13%
13%
22%
24%
6%
_%
_%
10%
22%
14%
LEVEL 1
52
44%
34
37%
18
72%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
42
46%
2
25%
5
56%
17
35%
35
51%
_
_
_
_
42
52%
10
27%
52
44%
LEVEL 2
50
42%
43
46%
7
28%
_
_
_
_
5
56%
38
41%
5
63%
2
22%
20
41%
30
43%
_
_
_
_
31
38%
19
51%
50
42%
LEVEL 3
7
6%
7
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
4
4%
1
13%
1
11%
4
8%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
4
5%
3
8%
7
6%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
9
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
8
9%
0
0%
1
11%
8
16%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
4
5%
5
14%
9
8%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 283
All Students
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
48
50%
LEVEL 2
34
35%
LEVEL 3
10
10%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
34
41%
LEVEL 2
34
41%
LEVEL 3
10
12%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
14
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
37
45%
LEVEL 2
32
39%
LEVEL 3
10
12%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
7
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
20
38%
LEVEL 2
21
40%
LEVEL 3
8
15%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
28
64%
LEVEL 2
13
30%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
37
57%
LEVEL 2
21
32%
LEVEL 3
6
9%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
11
35%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
48
50%
LEVEL 2
34
35%
LEVEL 3
10
10%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
82
14
1
6
3
83
3
7
52
44
95
1
65
31
96
PROFICIENT
15%
17%
0%
_%
0%
_%
17%
_%
0%
21%
7%
_%
_%
11%
23%
15%
LEVEL 1
48
50%
34
41%
14
100%
_
_
4
67%
_
_
37
45%
_
_
7
100%
20
38%
28
64%
_
_
_
_
37
57%
11
35%
48
50%
LEVEL 2
34
35%
34
41%
0
0%
_
_
2
33%
_
_
32
39%
_
_
0
0%
21
40%
13
30%
_
_
_
_
21
32%
13
42%
34
35%
LEVEL 3
10
10%
10
12%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
10
12%
_
_
0
0%
8
15%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
6
9%
4
13%
10
10%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
4
5%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
4
5%
_
_
0
0%
3
6%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
3
10%
4
4%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 292
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
39
36%
LEVEL 2
43
40%
LEVEL 3
17
16%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
28
31%
LEVEL 2
37
41%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
11
65%
LEVEL 2
6
35%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
11
79%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
White
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
18
23%
LEVEL 2
38
48%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
18
33%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
8
15%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
21
40%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
32
42%
LEVEL 2
27
36%
LEVEL 3
12
16%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
7
22%
LEVEL 2
16
50%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
39
36%
LEVEL 2
43
40%
LEVEL 3
17
16%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
108
91
17
14
7
80
7
55
53
107
1
76
32
108
PROFICIENT
24%
29%
0%
0%
29%
30%
0%
25%
23%
_%
_%
22%
28%
24%
LEVEL 1
39
36%
28
31%
11
65%
11
79%
4
57%
18
23%
6
86%
18
33%
21
40%
_
_
_
_
32
42%
7
22%
39
36%
LEVEL 2
43
40%
37
41%
6
35%
3
21%
1
14%
38
48%
1
14%
23
42%
20
38%
_
_
_
_
27
36%
16
50%
43
40%
LEVEL 3
17
16%
17
19%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
16
20%
0
0%
8
15%
9
17%
_
_
_
_
12
16%
5
16%
17
16%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
9
10%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
8
10%
0
0%
6
11%
3
6%
_
_
_
_
5
7%
4
13%
9
8%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
31
30%
LEVEL 2
37
35%
LEVEL 3
24
23%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
24
25%
LEVEL 2
35
37%
LEVEL 3
24
25%
LEVEL 4
12
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
7
70%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
23
29%
LEVEL 2
27
34%
LEVEL 3
20
25%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
18
31%
LEVEL 2
21
36%
LEVEL 3
14
24%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
13
28%
LEVEL 2
16
34%
LEVEL 3
10
21%
LEVEL 4
8
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
26
35%
LEVEL 2
30
40%
LEVEL 3
14
19%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
7
23%
LEVEL 3
10
33%
LEVEL 4
8
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
31
30%
LEVEL 2
37
35%
LEVEL 3
24
23%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
105
95
10
1
1
10
5
80
8
7
58
47
102
3
75
30
105
PROFICIENT
35%
38%
10%
_%
_%
10%
_%
38%
38%
43%
33%
38%
_%
_%
25%
60%
35%
LEVEL 1
31
30%
24
25%
7
70%
_
_
_
_
5
50%
_
_
23
29%
3
38%
0
0%
18
31%
13
28%
_
_
_
_
26
35%
5
17%
31
30%
LEVEL 2
37
35%
35
37%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
4
40%
_
_
27
34%
2
25%
4
57%
21
36%
16
34%
_
_
_
_
30
40%
7
23%
37
35%
LEVEL 3
24
23%
24
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
10%
_
_
20
25%
0
0%
3
43%
14
24%
10
21%
_
_
_
_
14
19%
10
33%
24
23%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
12
13%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
10
13%
3
38%
0
0%
5
9%
8
17%
_
_
_
_
5
7%
8
27%
13
12%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
35
28%
LEVEL 2
42
34%
LEVEL 3
26
21%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
22
21%
LEVEL 2
37
35%
LEVEL 3
26
25%
LEVEL 4
20
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
13
72%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
White
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
25
28%
LEVEL 2
31
34%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
LEVEL 4
17
19%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
18
27%
LEVEL 2
23
34%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
17
30%
LEVEL 2
19
34%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
31
26%
LEVEL 2
42
36%
LEVEL 3
26
22%
LEVEL 4
19
16%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
4
80%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
30
37%
LEVEL 2
27
33%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
15
37%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
11
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
35
28%
LEVEL 2
42
34%
LEVEL 3
26
21%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
105
18
2
13
12
90
6
8
67
56
118
5
82
41
123
PROFICIENT
37%
44%
0%
_%
23%
42%
38%
_%
50%
39%
36%
38%
20%
30%
51%
37%
LEVEL 1
35
28%
22
21%
13
72%
_
_
5
38%
5
42%
25
28%
_
_
0
0%
18
27%
17
30%
31
26%
4
80%
30
37%
5
12%
35
28%
LEVEL 2
42
34%
37
35%
5
28%
_
_
5
38%
2
17%
31
34%
_
_
4
50%
23
34%
19
34%
42
36%
0
0%
27
33%
15
37%
42
34%
LEVEL 3
26
21%
26
25%
0
0%
_
_
3
23%
2
17%
17
19%
_
_
4
50%
11
16%
15
27%
26
22%
0
0%
16
20%
10
24%
26
21%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
20
19%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
3
25%
17
19%
_
_
0
0%
15
22%
5
9%
19
16%
1
20%
9
11%
11
27%
20
16%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
32
32%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
28
30%
LEVEL 2
35
38%
LEVEL 3
20
22%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
8
57%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
21
26%
LEVEL 2
30
38%
LEVEL 3
19
24%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
5
71%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
13
28%
LEVEL 2
20
43%
LEVEL 3
9
19%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
19
35%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
11
20%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
29
37%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
11
14%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
8
35%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
32
32%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
101
92
9
1
1
14
4
80
1
7
47
54
99
2
78
23
101
PROFICIENT
30%
32%
11%
_%
_%
0%
_%
36%
_%
14%
30%
30%
_%
_%
23%
52%
30%
LEVEL 1
32
32%
28
30%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
_
_
21
26%
_
_
5
71%
13
28%
19
35%
_
_
_
_
29
37%
3
13%
32
32%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
35
38%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
8
57%
_
_
30
38%
_
_
1
14%
20
43%
19
35%
_
_
_
_
31
40%
8
35%
39
39%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
20
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
19
24%
_
_
1
14%
9
19%
11
20%
_
_
_
_
11
14%
9
39%
20
20%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
9
10%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
10
13%
_
_
0
0%
5
11%
5
9%
_
_
_
_
7
9%
3
13%
10
10%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
34
32%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
LEVEL 3
25
24%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
16
19%
LEVEL 2
34
40%
LEVEL 3
25
30%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
18
82%
LEVEL 2
4
18%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
28
33%
LEVEL 3
22
26%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
11
23%
LEVEL 2
20
42%
LEVEL 3
12
25%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
23
40%
LEVEL 2
18
31%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
28
41%
LEVEL 2
23
34%
LEVEL 3
13
19%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
6
16%
LEVEL 2
15
39%
LEVEL 3
12
32%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
34
32%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
LEVEL 3
25
24%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
106
84
22
2
5
10
84
5
7
48
58
104
2
68
38
106
PROFICIENT
32%
40%
0%
_%
0%
10%
36%
_%
43%
35%
29%
_%
_%
25%
45%
32%
LEVEL 1
34
32%
16
19%
18
82%
_
_
3
60%
5
50%
26
31%
_
_
0
0%
11
23%
23
40%
_
_
_
_
28
41%
6
16%
34
32%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
34
40%
4
18%
_
_
2
40%
4
40%
28
33%
_
_
4
57%
20
42%
18
31%
_
_
_
_
23
34%
15
39%
38
36%
LEVEL 3
25
24%
25
30%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
10%
22
26%
_
_
2
29%
12
25%
13
22%
_
_
_
_
13
19%
12
32%
25
24%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
9
11%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
8
10%
_
_
1
14%
5
10%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
4
6%
5
13%
9
8%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
17
21%
LEVEL 2
41
51%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
37
54%
LEVEL 3
16
24%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
8
67%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
83%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
32
48%
LEVEL 3
15
22%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
10
25%
LEVEL 2
14
35%
LEVEL 3
11
28%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
27
68%
LEVEL 3
5
13%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
11
21%
LEVEL 2
30
57%
LEVEL 3
11
21%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
6
22%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
17
21%
LEVEL 2
41
51%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
68
12
1
6
3
67
3
7
40
40
79
1
53
27
80
PROFICIENT
28%
32%
0%
_%
17%
_%
31%
_%
0%
40%
15%
_%
_%
23%
37%
28%
LEVEL 1
17
21%
9
13%
8
67%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
14
21%
_
_
3
43%
10
25%
7
18%
_
_
_
_
11
21%
6
22%
17
21%
LEVEL 2
41
51%
37
54%
4
33%
_
_
5
83%
_
_
32
48%
_
_
4
57%
14
35%
27
68%
_
_
_
_
30
57%
11
41%
41
51%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
16
24%
0
0%
_
_
1
17%
_
_
15
22%
_
_
0
0%
11
28%
5
13%
_
_
_
_
11
21%
5
19%
16
20%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
6
9%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
6
9%
_
_
0
0%
5
13%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
5
19%
6
8%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
37
41%
LEVEL 2
33
37%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
27
35%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
17
22%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
10
91%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
21
31%
LEVEL 2
27
40%
LEVEL 3
16
24%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
22
49%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
15
33%
LEVEL 2
20
44%
LEVEL 3
8
18%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
26
42%
LEVEL 2
26
42%
LEVEL 3
8
13%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
11
39%
LEVEL 2
7
25%
LEVEL 3
9
32%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
37
41%
LEVEL 2
33
37%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
90
78
12
11
7
67
5
45
45
88
2
62
28
90
PROFICIENT
22%
26%
0%
0%
14%
28%
0%
22%
22%
_%
_%
16%
36%
22%
LEVEL 1
37
41%
27
35%
10
83%
10
91%
3
43%
21
31%
3
60%
22
49%
15
33%
_
_
_
_
26
42%
11
39%
37
41%
LEVEL 2
33
37%
31
40%
2
17%
1
9%
3
43%
27
40%
2
40%
13
29%
20
44%
_
_
_
_
26
42%
7
25%
33
37%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
17
22%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
16
24%
0
0%
9
20%
8
18%
_
_
_
_
8
13%
9
32%
17
19%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
4%
0
0%
1
2%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
1
4%
3
3%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
_
_
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
_
_
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
4 & ABOVE
_
_
3 & ABOVE
_
_
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 82
All Students
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
LEVEL 3
56
42%
LEVEL 4
64
48%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
62
54%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
9
47%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
6
46%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
42
42%
LEVEL 4
50
51%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
5
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
31
44%
LEVEL 4
34
49%
Male
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
25
40%
LEVEL 4
30
48%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
56
44%
LEVEL 4
62
48%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
13%
LEVEL 3
43
48%
LEVEL 4
35
39%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
30%
LEVEL 4
29
67%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
LEVEL 3
56
42%
LEVEL 4
64
48%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
133
114
19
2
13
13
99
6
8
70
63
128
5
90
43
133
PROFICIENT
90%
96%
58%
_%
85%
69%
93%
_%
100%
93%
87%
92%
40%
87%
98%
90%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
5%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
5
4%
7
37%
_
_
2
15%
4
31%
6
6%
_
_
0
0%
5
7%
7
11%
9
7%
3
60%
12
13%
0
0%
12
9%
LEVEL 3
56
42%
47
41%
9
47%
_
_
5
38%
6
46%
42
42%
_
_
3
38%
31
44%
25
40%
56
44%
0
0%
43
48%
13
30%
56
42%
LEVEL 4
64
48%
62
54%
2
11%
_
_
6
46%
3
23%
50
51%
_
_
5
63%
34
49%
30
48%
62
48%
2
40%
35
39%
29
67%
64
48%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 70
All Students
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
54
49%
LEVEL 4
18
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
23
25%
LEVEL 3
50
54%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
13
72%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
12
80%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
White
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
LEVEL 3
46
56%
LEVEL 4
16
20%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
27
49%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
16
29%
LEVEL 3
27
49%
LEVEL 4
11
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
29
38%
LEVEL 3
39
51%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
21%
LEVEL 3
15
45%
LEVEL 4
11
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
54
49%
LEVEL 4
18
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
110
92
18
15
7
82
6
55
55
108
2
77
33
110
PROFICIENT
65%
73%
28%
13%
57%
76%
67%
62%
69%
_%
_%
60%
79%
65%
LEVEL 1
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
1
7%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
0
0%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
23
25%
13
72%
12
80%
3
43%
19
23%
2
33%
20
36%
16
29%
_
_
_
_
29
38%
7
21%
36
33%
LEVEL 3
54
49%
50
54%
4
22%
2
13%
2
29%
46
56%
4
67%
27
49%
27
49%
_
_
_
_
39
51%
15
45%
54
49%
LEVEL 4
18
16%
17
18%
1
6%
0
0%
2
29%
16
20%
0
0%
7
13%
11
20%
_
_
_
_
7
9%
11
33%
18
16%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2014 - 15)
GRADE
Grade 4
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
1
GRADE
Grade 4
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2014 - 15)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 4
1
Grade 8
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 4
1
Grade 8
1
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
73
51%
LEVEL 4
42
30%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
66
54%
LEVEL 4
42
34%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
4
20%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
7
35%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
7
54%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
55
52%
LEVEL 4
35
33%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
36
51%
LEVEL 4
24
34%
Male
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
37
52%
LEVEL 4
18
25%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
73
51%
LEVEL 4
42
30%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
5
7%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
49%
LEVEL 4
18
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
LEVEL 4
24
34%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
73
51%
LEVEL 4
42
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
142
122
20
1
13
13
106
9
10
71
71
142
72
70
142
PROFICIENT
81%
89%
35%
_%
69%
69%
85%
_%
70%
85%
77%
81%
74%
89%
81%
LEVEL 1
6
4%
2
2%
4
20%
_
_
1
8%
1
8%
3
3%
_
_
1
10%
2
3%
4
6%
6
4%
5
7%
1
1%
6
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
1
1%
2
10%
_
_
1
8%
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
2
3%
3
2%
1
1%
2
3%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
73
51%
66
54%
7
35%
_
_
7
54%
6
46%
55
52%
_
_
5
50%
36
51%
37
52%
73
51%
35
49%
38
54%
73
51%
LEVEL 4
42
30%
42
34%
0
0%
_
_
2
15%
3
23%
35
33%
_
_
2
20%
24
34%
18
25%
42
30%
18
25%
24
34%
42
30%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
87
61%
LEVEL 4
32
23%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
81
66%
LEVEL 4
32
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
9
69%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
9
69%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
62
58%
LEVEL 4
31
29%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
49
69%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
5
7%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
LEVEL 4
17
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
87
61%
LEVEL 4
32
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
47
65%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
40
57%
LEVEL 4
23
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
87
61%
LEVEL 4
32
23%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
142
122
20
1
13
13
106
9
10
71
71
142
72
70
142
PROFICIENT
84%
93%
30%
_%
69%
69%
88%
_%
80%
90%
77%
84%
78%
90%
84%
LEVEL 1
6
4%
1
1%
5
25%
_
_
1
8%
0
0%
4
4%
_
_
1
10%
1
1%
5
7%
6
4%
3
4%
3
4%
6
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
3
2%
4
20%
_
_
2
15%
2
15%
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
5
7%
7
5%
5
7%
2
3%
7
5%
LEVEL 3
87
61%
81
66%
6
30%
_
_
9
69%
9
69%
62
58%
_
_
7
70%
49
69%
38
54%
87
61%
47
65%
40
57%
87
61%
LEVEL 4
32
23%
32
26%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
31
29%
_
_
1
10%
15
21%
17
24%
32
23%
9
13%
23
33%
32
23%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
89
63%
LEVEL 4
25
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
84
69%
LEVEL 4
24
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
9
69%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
7
54%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
White
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
5
5%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
67
63%
LEVEL 4
22
21%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
6
60%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
47
66%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
42
59%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
89
63%
LEVEL 4
25
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
5
7%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
41
57%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
48
69%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
89
63%
LEVEL 4
25
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
142
122
20
1
13
13
106
9
10
71
71
142
72
70
142
PROFICIENT
80%
89%
30%
_%
69%
62%
84%
_%
80%
80%
80%
80%
71%
90%
80%
LEVEL 1
6
4%
1
1%
5
25%
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
5
5%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
4
6%
6
4%
5
7%
1
1%
6
4%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
4
3%
4
20%
_
_
2
15%
2
15%
3
3%
_
_
1
10%
6
8%
2
3%
8
6%
7
10%
1
1%
8
6%
LEVEL 3
89
63%
84
69%
5
25%
_
_
9
69%
7
54%
67
63%
_
_
6
60%
47
66%
42
59%
89
63%
41
57%
48
69%
89
63%
LEVEL 4
25
18%
24
20%
1
5%
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
22
21%
_
_
2
20%
10
14%
15
21%
25
18%
10
14%
15
21%
25
18%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
59
42%
LEVEL 4
58
41%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
53
43%
LEVEL 4
56
46%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
4
20%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
10
77%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
38
36%
LEVEL 4
52
49%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
60%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
32
45%
LEVEL 4
27
38%
Male
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
27
38%
LEVEL 4
31
44%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
59
42%
LEVEL 4
58
41%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
35
49%
LEVEL 4
19
26%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
24
34%
LEVEL 4
39
56%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
59
42%
LEVEL 4
58
41%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
142
122
20
1
13
13
106
9
10
71
71
142
72
70
142
PROFICIENT
82%
89%
40%
_%
77%
62%
85%
_%
90%
83%
82%
82%
75%
90%
82%
LEVEL 1
5
4%
1
1%
4
20%
_
_
0
0%
2
15%
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
4
6%
5
4%
4
6%
1
1%
5
4%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
2
2%
1
5%
_
_
1
8%
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
1
1%
3
2%
2
3%
1
1%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
59
42%
53
43%
6
30%
_
_
10
77%
5
38%
38
36%
_
_
6
60%
32
45%
27
38%
59
42%
35
49%
24
34%
59
42%
LEVEL 4
58
41%
56
46%
2
10%
_
_
0
0%
3
23%
52
49%
_
_
3
30%
27
38%
31
44%
58
41%
19
26%
39
56%
58
41%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
81
57%
LEVEL 4
36
25%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
75
61%
LEVEL 4
36
30%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
3
15%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
77%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
8
62%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
57
54%
LEVEL 4
33
31%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
6
60%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
41
58%
LEVEL 4
18
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
40
56%
LEVEL 4
18
25%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
81
57%
LEVEL 4
36
25%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
42
58%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
39
56%
LEVEL 4
25
36%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
81
57%
LEVEL 4
36
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
142
122
20
1
13
13
106
9
10
71
71
142
72
70
142
PROFICIENT
82%
91%
30%
_%
77%
69%
85%
_%
80%
83%
82%
82%
74%
91%
82%
LEVEL 1
3
2%
1
1%
2
10%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
2
3%
3
2%
3
4%
0
0%
3
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
0
0%
3
15%
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
1
1%
_
_
1
10%
2
3%
1
1%
3
2%
3
4%
0
0%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
81
57%
75
61%
6
30%
_
_
10
77%
8
62%
57
54%
_
_
6
60%
41
58%
40
56%
81
57%
42
58%
39
56%
81
57%
LEVEL 4
36
25%
36
30%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
33
31%
_
_
2
20%
18
25%
18
25%
36
25%
11
15%
25
36%
36
25%
Regents Examination Results (2014 - 15)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
126
114
12
1
20
8
90
7
8
64
62
126
71
55
126
55
115
91%
107
94%
8
67%
_
_
16
80%
8
100%
85
94%
_
_
6
75%
59
92%
56
90%
115
91%
60
85%
55
100%
115
91%
65
108
86%
102
89%
6
50%
_
_
13
65%
8
100%
82
91%
_
_
5
63%
57
89%
51
82%
108
86%
54
76%
54
98%
108
86%
85
48
38%
48
42%
0
0%
_
_
4
20%
4
50%
39
43%
_
_
1
13%
33
52%
15
24%
48
38%
23
32%
25
45%
48
38%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
91%
65
108
86%
85
48
38%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
94%
65
102
89%
85
48
42%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
67%
65
6
50%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
80%
65
13
65%
85
4
20%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
4
50%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
85
94%
65
82
91%
85
39
43%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
5
63%
85
1
13%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
92%
65
57
89%
85
33
52%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
90%
65
51
82%
85
15
24%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
91%
65
108
86%
85
48
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
85%
65
54
76%
85
23
32%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
100%
65
54
98%
85
25
45%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
91%
65
108
86%
85
48
38%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
94
66
28
15
10
66
3
13
39
55
94
70
24
94
55
76
81%
57
86%
19
68%
15
100%
_
_
51
77%
_
_
10
77%
30
77%
46
84%
76
81%
55
79%
21
88%
76
81%
65
54
57%
38
58%
16
57%
12
80%
_
_
35
53%
_
_
7
54%
24
62%
30
55%
54
57%
37
53%
17
71%
54
57%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
81%
65
54
57%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
86%
65
38
58%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
68%
65
16
57%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
12
80%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
77%
65
35
53%
85
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
77%
65
7
54%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
77%
65
24
62%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
84%
65
30
55%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
81%
65
54
57%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
79%
65
37
53%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
88%
65
17
71%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
81%
65
54
57%
85
0
0%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
81
1
4
4
72
2
10
49
33
82
40
42
82
55
82
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
72
100%
_
_
10
100%
49
100%
33
100%
82
100%
40
100%
42
100%
82
100%
65
79
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
97%
_
_
9
90%
48
98%
31
94%
79
96%
37
93%
42
100%
79
96%
85
16
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
19%
_
_
2
20%
10
20%
6
18%
16
20%
8
20%
8
19%
16
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
100%
65
79
96%
85
16
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
100%
65
70
97%
85
14
19%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
9
90%
85
2
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
100%
65
48
98%
85
10
20%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
100%
65
31
94%
85
6
18%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
100%
65
79
96%
85
16
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
37
93%
85
8
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
100%
65
42
100%
85
8
19%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
100%
65
79
96%
85
16
20%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
50
50
2
4
2
41
1
9
24
26
50
18
32
50
55
42
84%
42
84%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
85%
_
_
7
78%
18
75%
24
92%
42
84%
12
67%
30
94%
42
84%
65
32
64%
32
64%
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
68%
_
_
4
44%
13
54%
19
73%
32
64%
8
44%
24
75%
32
64%
85
9
18%
9
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
20%
_
_
1
11%
2
8%
7
27%
9
18%
1
6%
8
25%
9
18%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
84%
65
32
64%
85
9
18%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
84%
65
32
64%
85
9
18%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
85%
65
28
68%
85
8
20%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
4
44%
85
1
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
75%
65
13
54%
85
2
8%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
92%
65
19
73%
85
7
27%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
84%
65
32
64%
85
9
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
67%
65
8
44%
85
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
94%
65
24
75%
85
8
25%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
84%
65
32
64%
85
9
18%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
138
118
20
2
17
10
103
6
8
64
74
138
98
40
138
LEVEL 1
30
22%
19
16%
11
55%
_
_
4
24%
3
30%
21
20%
_
_
2
25%
9
14%
21
28%
30
22%
27
28%
3
8%
30
22%
LEVEL 2
38
28%
30
25%
8
40%
_
_
5
29%
4
40%
26
25%
_
_
3
38%
17
27%
21
28%
38
28%
30
31%
8
20%
38
28%
LEVEL 3
64
46%
63
53%
1
5%
_
_
8
47%
2
20%
51
50%
_
_
3
38%
37
58%
27
36%
64
46%
38
39%
26
65%
64
46%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
6
5%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
10%
5
5%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
5
7%
6
4%
3
3%
3
8%
6
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 138
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
30
22%
LEVEL 2
38
28%
LEVEL 3
64
46%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
19
16%
LEVEL 2
30
25%
LEVEL 3
63
53%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
55%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
24%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
8
47%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
20%
LEVEL 2
26
25%
LEVEL 3
51
50%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
14%
LEVEL 2
17
27%
LEVEL 3
37
58%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
21
28%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 138
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
30
22%
LEVEL 2
38
28%
LEVEL 3
64
46%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
27
28%
LEVEL 2
30
31%
LEVEL 3
38
39%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
8
20%
LEVEL 3
26
65%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 138
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
30
22%
LEVEL 2
38
28%
LEVEL 3
64
46%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
79
1
3
4
71
2
9
49
31
80
38
42
80
LEVEL 1
5
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
6%
_
_
1
11%
4
8%
1
3%
5
6%
4
11%
1
2%
5
6%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
15%
_
_
1
11%
9
18%
3
10%
12
15%
5
13%
7
17%
12
15%
LEVEL 3
54
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
66%
_
_
7
78%
31
63%
23
74%
54
68%
25
66%
29
69%
54
68%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
7%
_
_
0
0%
3
6%
2
6%
5
6%
3
8%
2
5%
5
6%
LEVEL 5
4
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
6%
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
2
6%
4
5%
1
3%
3
7%
4
5%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
LEVEL 3
54
68%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
LEVEL 5
4
5%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
11
15%
LEVEL 3
47
66%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
9
18%
LEVEL 3
31
63%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
23
74%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
LEVEL 3
54
68%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
LEVEL 5
4
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
5
13%
LEVEL 3
25
66%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
7
17%
LEVEL 3
29
69%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
3
7%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
LEVEL 3
54
68%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
LEVEL 5
4
5%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
172
145
27
25
12
131
4
16
85
87
172
106
66
172
55
136
79%
118
81%
18
67%
19
76%
_
_
106
81%
_
_
11
69%
67
79%
69
79%
136
79%
80
75%
56
85%
136
79%
65
104
60%
95
66%
9
33%
12
48%
_
_
87
66%
_
_
5
31%
47
55%
57
66%
104
60%
53
50%
51
77%
104
60%
85
28
16%
27
19%
1
4%
0
0%
_
_
28
21%
_
_
0
0%
10
12%
18
21%
28
16%
12
11%
16
24%
28
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
136
79%
65
104
60%
85
28
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
118
81%
65
95
66%
85
27
19%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
67%
65
9
33%
85
1
4%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
76%
65
12
48%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 131
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
81%
65
87
66%
85
28
21%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
69%
65
5
31%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
79%
65
47
55%
85
10
12%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
79%
65
57
66%
85
18
21%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
136
79%
65
104
60%
85
28
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
75%
65
53
50%
85
12
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
85%
65
51
77%
85
16
24%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
136
79%
65
104
60%
85
28
16%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
114
11
1
18
10
90
6
7
66
59
125
67
58
125
55
121
97%
111
97%
10
91%
_
_
18
100%
10
100%
86
96%
_
_
7
100%
66
100%
55
93%
121
97%
64
96%
57
98%
121
97%
65
111
89%
102
89%
9
82%
_
_
16
89%
10
100%
79
88%
_
_
6
86%
61
92%
50
85%
111
89%
58
87%
53
91%
111
89%
85
62
50%
60
53%
2
18%
_
_
3
17%
6
60%
50
56%
_
_
3
43%
37
56%
25
42%
62
50%
28
42%
34
59%
62
50%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
97%
65
111
89%
85
62
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
111
97%
65
102
89%
85
60
53%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
9
82%
85
2
18%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
16
89%
85
3
17%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
6
60%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
86
96%
65
79
88%
85
50
56%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
3
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
100%
65
61
92%
85
37
56%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
93%
65
50
85%
85
25
42%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
97%
65
111
89%
85
62
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
96%
65
58
87%
85
28
42%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
98%
65
53
91%
85
34
59%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
97%
65
111
89%
85
62
50%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
137
118
19
15
11
109
2
13
71
66
137
85
52
137
55
125
91%
112
95%
13
68%
13
87%
_
_
100
92%
_
_
12
92%
62
87%
63
95%
125
91%
74
87%
51
98%
125
91%
65
108
79%
102
86%
6
32%
8
53%
_
_
91
83%
_
_
9
69%
54
76%
54
82%
108
79%
63
74%
45
87%
108
79%
85
25
18%
24
20%
1
5%
0
0%
_
_
24
22%
_
_
1
8%
9
13%
16
24%
25
18%
13
15%
12
23%
25
18%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
91%
65
108
79%
85
25
18%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
112
95%
65
102
86%
85
24
20%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
68%
65
6
32%
85
1
5%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
87%
65
8
53%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
92%
65
91
83%
85
24
22%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
9
69%
85
1
8%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
87%
65
54
76%
85
9
13%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
63
95%
65
54
82%
85
16
24%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
91%
65
108
79%
85
25
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
87%
65
63
74%
85
13
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
98%
65
45
87%
85
12
23%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
91%
65
108
79%
85
25
18%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
95
92
3
10
6
77
2
8
48
47
95
55
40
95
55
66
69%
_
_
_
_
3
30%
_
_
57
74%
_
_
6
75%
34
71%
32
68%
66
69%
31
56%
35
88%
66
69%
65
49
52%
_
_
_
_
1
10%
_
_
44
57%
_
_
4
50%
24
50%
25
53%
49
52%
21
38%
28
70%
49
52%
85
10
11%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
8
10%
_
_
2
25%
4
8%
6
13%
10
11%
3
5%
7
18%
10
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
69%
65
49
52%
85
10
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
30%
65
1
10%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
74%
65
44
57%
85
8
10%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
4
50%
85
2
25%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
71%
65
24
50%
85
4
8%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
68%
65
25
53%
85
6
13%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
69%
65
49
52%
85
10
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
56%
65
21
38%
85
3
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
88%
65
28
70%
85
7
18%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
69%
65
49
52%
85
10
11%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
41
1
2
2
36
5
26
15
41
15
26
41
55
37
90%
37
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
89%
5
100%
23
88%
14
93%
37
90%
14
93%
23
88%
37
90%
65
26
63%
26
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
64%
3
60%
16
62%
10
67%
26
63%
8
53%
18
69%
26
63%
85
3
7%
3
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
8%
0
0%
2
8%
1
7%
3
7%
1
7%
2
8%
3
7%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
90%
65
26
63%
85
3
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
90%
65
26
63%
85
3
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
89%
65
23
64%
85
3
8%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
88%
65
16
62%
85
2
8%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
93%
65
10
67%
85
1
7%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
90%
65
26
63%
85
3
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
93%
65
8
53%
85
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
88%
65
18
69%
85
2
8%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
90%
65
26
63%
85
3
7%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
6
6
5
1
6
2
4
6
3
3
6
55
6
100%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
65
5
83%
5
83%
_
_
_
_
5
83%
_
_
_
_
5
83%
_
_
_
_
5
83%
85
1
17%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
17%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Regents Competency Test Results (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
Writing
1
_
Math
1
_
Global Studies
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
All Students
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Students with Disabilities
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Black or African American
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Multiracial
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Small Group Total
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Male
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Economically Disadvantaged
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Migrant
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
100%
100%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
5
5
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
5
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
5 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
5
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2014 - 15)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
4
4
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
4
4
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
5
3
2
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
20%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
20%
_
_
EXPANDING
40%
_
_
COMMANDING
20%
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
YES
―
NO
YES
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,696*
2
149*
106*
9
1,347*
39
278*
16
1,186*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
―
94%*
95%*
―
89%*
―
89%*
―
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
YES
―
NO
YES
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
657
2
62
42
8
511
32
106✝
13
462
PI
80
―
40
79
―
85
72
37✝
―
70
EAMO
93
―
66
68
―
109
80
50
―
79
Safe Harbor Target
91
―
56
68
―
96
20
50
―
79
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,696*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
657
PI
80
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
91
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
149*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
62
PI
40
EAMO
66
Safe Harbor Target
56
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
106*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
42
PI
79
EAMO
68
Safe Harbor Target
68
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,347*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
PI
85
EAMO
109
Safe Harbor Target
96
Multiracial
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
72
EAMO
80
Safe Harbor Target
20
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
278*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
106✝
PI
37✝
EAMO
50
Safe Harbor Target
50
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,186*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
462
PI
70
EAMO
79
Safe Harbor Target
79
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,692*
1,547*
1,590*
1,678*
349*
1,624*
1,418*
1,661*
510*
860*
836*
0
1,696*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
90%*
90%*
90%*
94%*
90%*
90%*
90%*
88%*
88%*
92%*
―
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
655
595
615
649
146
625
551
644
195
326
331
0
657
PI
80
84
80
80
62
80
88
80
104
71
89
―
80
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,692*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
655
PI
80
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,547*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
595
PI
84
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,590*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
615
PI
80
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,678*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
649
PI
80
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
349*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
146
PI
62
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,624*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
625
PI
80
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,418*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
551
PI
88
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,661*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
644
PI
80
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
510*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
195
PI
104
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
860*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
326
PI
71
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
836*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
331
PI
89
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,696*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
657
PI
80
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,698*
2
148*
106*
9
1,349*
73*
282*
16
1,186*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
―
90%*
93%*
―
85%*
84%*
83%*
―
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
YES
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
592
2
57
39
7
460
55⁰
90✝
15
409
PI
105
―
63
87
―
111
85
50✝
―
94
EAMO
90
―
59
65
―
105
76
52
―
76
Safe Harbor Target
90
―
59
65
―
105
20
52
―
76
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,698*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
592
PI
105
EAMO
90
Safe Harbor Target
90
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
63
EAMO
59
Safe Harbor Target
59
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
106*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
39
PI
87
EAMO
65
Safe Harbor Target
65
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,349*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
460
PI
111
EAMO
105
Safe Harbor Target
105
Multiracial
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
73*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55⁰
PI
85
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
20
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
282*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
90✝
PI
50✝
EAMO
52
Safe Harbor Target
52
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,186*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
409
PI
94
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
76
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,694*
1,550*
1,592*
1,680*
349*
1,625*
1,416*
1,663*
512*
860*
838*
0
1,698*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
86%*
85%*
86%*
90%*
86%*
87%*
86%*
85%*
85%*
87%*
―
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
590
535
553
585
132
565
502
577
183
292
300
0
592
PI
105
109
106
105
83
105
115
106
129
102
107
―
105
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,694*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
590
PI
105
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,550*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
535
PI
109
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,592*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
553
PI
106
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,680*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
585
PI
105
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
349*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
132
PI
83
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,625*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
565
PI
105
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,416*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
502
PI
115
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,663*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
577
PI
106
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
512*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
183
PI
129
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
860*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
292
PI
102
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
838*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
300
PI
107
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,698*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
592
PI
105
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ⁰ This group failed to meet the participation criterion and had fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so data for the current and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
289
0
33
22
2
216
16
50
7
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
―
―
―
―
85%
―
86%
―
85%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
237
0
29
17
2
177
12
39✝
7
163
PI
179
―
―
―
―
185
―
151✝
―
174
EAMO
178
―
―
―
―
185
―
150
―
169
Progress Target
173
―
―
―
―
177
―
141
―
168
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
289
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
237
PI
179
EAMO
178
Progress Target
173
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
33
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
29
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
216
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
PI
185
EAMO
185
Progress Target
177
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
50
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
39✝
PI
151✝
EAMO
150
Progress Target
141
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
163
PI
174
EAMO
169
Progress Target
168
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
289
256
267
287
73
273
239
282
86
140
149
0
289
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
86%
85%
86%
89%
86%
86%
86%
88%
86%
86%
―
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
237
208
220
235
60
225
198
230
74
113
124
0
237
PI
179
184
180
179
160
179
184
180
191
179
179
―
179
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
289
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
237
PI
179
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
256
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
208
PI
184
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
220
PI
180
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
287
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
235
PI
179
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
73
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
160
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
273
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
PI
179
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
239
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
198
PI
184
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
282
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
230
PI
180
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
86
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
74
PI
191
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
140
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
113
PI
179
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
149
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
124
PI
179
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
289
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
237
PI
179
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
124
0
15
8
1
92
8
10
0
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
0
11
12
1
99
8
19
0
64
PI
153
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
144
EAMO
161
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
145
Safe Harbor Target
127
―
―
―
―
134
―
―
―
106
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
153
EAMO
161
Safe Harbor Target
127
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
163
EAMO
171
Safe Harbor Target
134
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
64
PI
144
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
106
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
124
109
116
123
32
116
114
124
66
63
61
0
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
120
119
130
32
123
112
131
67
67
64
0
131
PI
153
157
155
152
122
155
167
153
161
143
163
―
153
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
153
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
120
PI
157
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
119
PI
155
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
123
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
130
PI
152
Not White
12th Graders
32
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
122
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
155
General Education
12th Graders
114
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
112
PI
167
English Proficient
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
153
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
66
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
161
Male
12th Graders
63
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
143
Female
12th Graders
61
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
64
PI
163
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
153
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
124
0
15
8
1
92
8
10
0
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
0
11
12
1
99
8
19
0
64
PI
138
―
―
―
―
148
―
―
―
122
EAMO
145
―
―
―
―
156
―
―
―
126
Safe Harbor Target
124
―
―
―
―
127
―
―
―
106
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
138
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
124
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
99
PI
148
EAMO
156
Safe Harbor Target
127
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
64
PI
122
EAMO
126
Safe Harbor Target
106
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
124
109
116
123
32
116
114
124
66
63
61
0
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
120
119
130
32
123
112
131
67
67
64
0
131
PI
138
142
142
138
106
140
152
138
154
134
142
―
138
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
138
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
120
PI
142
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
119
PI
142
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
123
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
130
PI
138
Not White
12th Graders
32
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
106
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
140
General Education
12th Graders
114
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
112
PI
152
English Proficient
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
138
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
66
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
154
Male
12th Graders
63
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
134
Female
12th Graders
61
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
64
PI
142
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
124
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
131
PI
138
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
80
―
40
79
―
85
72
37
―
70
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
105
―
63
87
―
111
―
50
―
94
Secondary-Level ELA PI
153
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
144
Secondary-Level MATH PI
138
―
―
―
―
148
―
―
―
122
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
119
0
52
83
0
127
72
44
0
108
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
80
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
105
Secondary-Level ELA PI
153
Secondary-Level MATH PI
138
Unweighted Combined PI
119
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
40
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
63
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
52
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
79
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
87
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
83
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
85
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
111
Secondary-Level ELA PI
163
Secondary-Level MATH PI
148
Unweighted Combined PI
127
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
72
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
72
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
37
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
50
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
44
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
70
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
94
Secondary-Level ELA PI
144
Secondary-Level MATH PI
122
Unweighted Combined PI
108
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
0
19
9
3
107
5
26
1
83
Graduation Rate
83%
―
―
―
―
84%
―
―
―
75%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
74%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
Graduation Rate
83%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
19
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
9
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
84%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
83
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
74%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
150
0
19
4
2
124
1
18
1
77
Graduation Rate
82%
―
―
―
―
85%
―
―
―
78%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
78%
―
―
―
77%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
150
Graduation Rate
82%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
19
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
78%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
18
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
78%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
77%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
124
134
140
36
138
117
142
60
70
73
0
143
Graduation Rate
83%
84%
83%
82%
78%
83%
85%
82%
93%
81%
84%
―
83%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
150
131
146
148
26
149
132
149
73
72
78
0
150
Graduation Rate
82%
85%
82%
82%
―
82%
87%
82%
86%
78%
86%
―
82%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
Graduation Rate
83%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
84%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
134
Graduation Rate
83%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
82%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
83%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
117
Graduation Rate
85%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
60
Graduation Rate
93%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
81%
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
84%
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
Graduation Rate
83%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
150
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
131
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
148
Graduation Rate
82%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
149
Graduation Rate
82%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
132
Graduation Rate
87%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
149
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
86%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
78%
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
78
Graduation Rate
86%
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
150
Graduation Rate
82%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
19%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
19%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
6%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
4%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
