SYRACUSE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE CS - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
SYRACUSE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE CS ENROLLMENT (2012 - 13)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
659
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
291
44%
FEMALE
368
56%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
TOTAL
19
346
112
24
158
PERCENT
3%
53%
17%
4%
24%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
30
5%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
50
8%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
477
72%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
TOTAL
49
50
48
49
26
52
65
65
66
63
59
67
PERCENT
7%
8%
7%
7%
4%
8%
10%
10%
10%
10%
9%
10%
SYRACUSE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE CS ENROLLMENT (2012 - 13)
K-12 Enrollment: 659
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
291
44%
FEMALE
368
56%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
19
3%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
346
53%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
112
17%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
24
4%
WHITE
158
24%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
30
5%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
50
8%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
477
72%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
49
7%
1ST GRADE
50
8%
2ND GRADE
48
7%
3RD GRADE
49
7%
5TH GRADE
26
4%
6TH GRADE
52
8%
7TH GRADE
65
10%
8TH GRADE
65
10%
9TH GRADE
66
10%
10TH GRADE
63
10%
11TH GRADE
59
9%
12TH GRADE
67
10%
Average Class Size (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
CLASS SIZE
24
12
22
Average Class Size (2012 - 13)
Common Branch
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
12
Grade 8 Science
22
Average Class Size (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
CLASS SIZE
24
12
22
Average Class Size (2012 - 13)
Common Branch
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
12
Grade 8 Science
22
Average Class Size (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
CLASS SIZE
24
12
22
Average Class Size (2012 - 13)
Common Branch
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
12
Grade 8 Science
22
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2012 - 13)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
328
50%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
132
20%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2012 - 13)
Eligible for Free Lunch
328
50%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
132
20%
ATTENDANCE (2011 - 12)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
95%
Attendance (2011 - 12)
Annual Attendance Rate
95%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
41%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
31%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
41%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
31%
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
1
4
1
0
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
Principals
1
Assistant Principals
4
Other Professional Staff
1
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS
41
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
5%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
5%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
34%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
10%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
74
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
86
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
6%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 41
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
5%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
5%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
34%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
10%
Total Number of Core Classes
74
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
86
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
6%
High School Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
60
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
59
98%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
4
7%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
2%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
60
Regents Diploma
59
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
4
7%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
60
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
59
98%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
4
7%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
2%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
60
Regents Diploma
59
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
4
7%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
60
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
59
98%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
4
7%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
2%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
60
Regents Diploma
59
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
4
7%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
32
53%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
23
38%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
2
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
5%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
32
53%
To Two-Year College
23
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
3%
To Employment
3
5%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
32
53%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
23
38%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
2
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
5%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
32
53%
To Two-Year College
23
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
3%
To Employment
3
5%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
32
53%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
23
38%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
2
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
5%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
32
53%
To Two-Year College
23
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
3%
To Employment
3
5%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 318
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
17
37%
LEVEL 3
22
48%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
3
12%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
11
42%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
6
55%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
9
33%
LEVEL 3
16
59%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
3
16%
LEVEL 2
8
42%
LEVEL 3
6
32%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
17
37%
LEVEL 3
22
48%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
15
43%
LEVEL 3
15
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
17
37%
LEVEL 3
22
48%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
46
45
1
1
26
11
8
9
27
19
46
35
11
46
PROFICIENT
52%
_%
_%
_%
50%
55%
_%
56%
59%
42%
52%
43%
82%
52%
LEVEL 1
5
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
12%
1
9%
_
_
1
11%
2
7%
3
16%
5
11%
5
14%
0
0%
5
11%
LEVEL 2
17
37%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
38%
4
36%
_
_
3
33%
9
33%
8
42%
17
37%
15
43%
2
18%
17
37%
LEVEL 3
22
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
42%
6
55%
_
_
5
56%
16
59%
6
32%
22
48%
15
43%
7
64%
22
48%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
8%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
11%
2
4%
0
0%
2
18%
2
4%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 318
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
6
26%
LEVEL 2
5
22%
LEVEL 3
6
26%
LEVEL 4
6
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
4
31%
Female
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Male
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
5
29%
LEVEL 2
3
18%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
6
26%
LEVEL 2
5
22%
LEVEL 3
6
26%
LEVEL 4
6
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
23
21
2
1
10
3
9
13
11
12
22
1
17
6
23
PROFICIENT
52%
_%
_%
_%
60%
_%
_%
46%
55%
50%
_%
_%
53%
50%
52%
LEVEL 1
6
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
30%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
3
27%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
5
29%
1
17%
6
26%
LEVEL 2
5
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
10%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
2
18%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
3
18%
2
33%
5
22%
LEVEL 3
6
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
40%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
1
9%
5
42%
_
_
_
_
5
29%
1
17%
6
26%
LEVEL 4
6
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
20%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
5
45%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
4
24%
2
33%
6
26%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
11
21%
LEVEL 2
26
50%
LEVEL 3
11
21%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
5
16%
LEVEL 2
20
65%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
7
26%
LEVEL 2
13
48%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
13
52%
LEVEL 3
7
28%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
11
28%
LEVEL 2
19
48%
LEVEL 3
8
20%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
58%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
11
21%
LEVEL 2
26
50%
LEVEL 3
11
21%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
52
49
3
2
31
14
5
7
27
25
49
3
40
12
52
PROFICIENT
29%
_%
_%
_%
19%
36%
_%
57%
26%
32%
_%
_%
25%
42%
29%
LEVEL 1
11
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
16%
3
21%
_
_
3
43%
7
26%
4
16%
_
_
_
_
11
28%
0
0%
11
21%
LEVEL 2
26
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
65%
6
43%
_
_
0
0%
13
48%
13
52%
_
_
_
_
19
48%
7
58%
26
50%
LEVEL 3
11
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
16%
4
29%
_
_
2
29%
4
15%
7
28%
_
_
_
_
8
20%
3
25%
11
21%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
7%
_
_
2
29%
3
11%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
2
17%
4
8%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
10
16%
LEVEL 2
28
46%
LEVEL 3
20
33%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
25
45%
LEVEL 3
19
35%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
5
20%
LEVEL 2
13
52%
LEVEL 3
7
28%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
9
41%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
13
37%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
6
23%
LEVEL 2
12
46%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
10
20%
LEVEL 2
24
49%
LEVEL 3
13
27%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
10
16%
LEVEL 2
28
46%
LEVEL 3
20
33%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
55
6
1
2
25
11
22
14
35
26
57
4
49
12
61
PROFICIENT
38%
38%
33%
_%
_%
28%
_%
50%
36%
43%
31%
_%
_%
31%
67%
38%
LEVEL 1
10
16%
9
16%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
5
20%
_
_
3
14%
2
14%
4
11%
6
23%
_
_
_
_
10
20%
0
0%
10
16%
LEVEL 2
28
46%
25
45%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
13
52%
_
_
8
36%
7
50%
16
46%
12
46%
_
_
_
_
24
49%
4
33%
28
46%
LEVEL 3
20
33%
19
35%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
7
28%
_
_
9
41%
4
29%
13
37%
7
27%
_
_
_
_
13
27%
7
58%
20
33%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
2
4%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
2
9%
1
7%
2
6%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
1
8%
3
5%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
9
26%
LEVEL 2
16
47%
LEVEL 3
7
21%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
White
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
6
20%
LEVEL 2
15
50%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
14
45%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
11
25%
LEVEL 2
21
48%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
8
47%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
58
3
4
3
34
11
9
7
30
31
60
1
44
17
61
PROFICIENT
33%
_%
_%
_%
_%
26%
45%
22%
57%
30%
35%
_%
_%
27%
47%
33%
LEVEL 1
12
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
26%
2
18%
1
11%
0
0%
6
20%
6
19%
_
_
_
_
11
25%
1
6%
12
20%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
47%
4
36%
6
67%
3
43%
15
50%
14
45%
_
_
_
_
21
48%
8
47%
29
48%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
21%
3
27%
2
22%
2
29%
5
17%
9
29%
_
_
_
_
10
23%
4
24%
14
23%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
2
18%
0
0%
2
29%
4
13%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
4
24%
6
10%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
8
17%
LEVEL 2
16
35%
LEVEL 3
16
35%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
3
12%
LEVEL 2
11
42%
LEVEL 3
9
35%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
10
37%
LEVEL 3
12
44%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
6
32%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
4
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
8
17%
LEVEL 2
16
35%
LEVEL 3
16
35%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
8
23%
LEVEL 2
13
37%
LEVEL 3
11
31%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
8
17%
LEVEL 2
16
35%
LEVEL 3
16
35%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
46
45
1
1
26
11
8
9
27
19
46
35
11
46
PROFICIENT
48%
_%
_%
_%
46%
55%
_%
44%
52%
42%
48%
40%
73%
48%
LEVEL 1
8
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
12%
2
18%
_
_
3
33%
3
11%
5
26%
8
17%
8
23%
0
0%
8
17%
LEVEL 2
16
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
42%
3
27%
_
_
2
22%
10
37%
6
32%
16
35%
13
37%
3
27%
16
35%
LEVEL 3
16
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
35%
4
36%
_
_
3
33%
12
44%
4
21%
16
35%
11
31%
5
45%
16
35%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
12%
2
18%
_
_
1
11%
2
7%
4
21%
6
13%
3
9%
3
27%
6
13%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
6
26%
LEVEL 2
10
43%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
6
60%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
Female
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
4
24%
LEVEL 2
8
47%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
6
26%
LEVEL 2
10
43%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
23
21
2
1
10
3
9
13
11
12
22
1
17
6
23
PROFICIENT
30%
_%
_%
_%
10%
_%
_%
46%
36%
25%
_%
_%
29%
33%
30%
LEVEL 1
6
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
30%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
3
27%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
4
24%
2
33%
6
26%
LEVEL 2
10
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
60%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
4
36%
6
50%
_
_
_
_
8
47%
2
33%
10
43%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
10%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
3
27%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
4
24%
0
0%
4
17%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
1
9%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
2
33%
3
13%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 312
All Students
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
24
46%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
14
45%
LEVEL 3
8
26%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
3
21%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
12
44%
LEVEL 3
7
26%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
12
48%
LEVEL 3
6
24%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
17
43%
LEVEL 3
10
25%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
58%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
24
46%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
52
49
3
2
31
14
5
7
27
25
49
3
40
12
52
PROFICIENT
40%
_%
_%
_%
35%
50%
_%
43%
44%
36%
_%
_%
40%
42%
40%
LEVEL 1
7
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
19%
1
7%
_
_
0
0%
3
11%
4
16%
_
_
_
_
7
18%
0
0%
7
13%
LEVEL 2
24
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
45%
6
43%
_
_
4
57%
12
44%
12
48%
_
_
_
_
17
43%
7
58%
24
46%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
26%
4
29%
_
_
1
14%
7
26%
6
24%
_
_
_
_
10
25%
3
25%
13
25%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
10%
3
21%
_
_
2
29%
5
19%
3
12%
_
_
_
_
6
15%
2
17%
8
15%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
24
39%
LEVEL 2
22
36%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
20
36%
LEVEL 2
21
38%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
10
40%
LEVEL 2
12
48%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
7
32%
LEVEL 2
7
32%
LEVEL 3
6
27%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
7
50%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
15
43%
LEVEL 2
12
34%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
9
35%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
21
43%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
9
18%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
5
42%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
24
39%
LEVEL 2
22
36%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
55
6
1
2
25
11
22
14
35
26
57
4
49
12
61
PROFICIENT
25%
25%
17%
_%
_%
12%
_%
36%
29%
23%
27%
_%
_%
22%
33%
25%
LEVEL 1
24
39%
20
36%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
10
40%
_
_
7
32%
7
50%
15
43%
9
35%
_
_
_
_
21
43%
3
25%
24
39%
LEVEL 2
22
36%
21
38%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
12
48%
_
_
7
32%
3
21%
12
34%
10
38%
_
_
_
_
17
35%
5
42%
22
36%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
10
18%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
_
_
6
27%
4
29%
5
14%
6
23%
_
_
_
_
9
18%
2
17%
11
18%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
4
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
8%
_
_
2
9%
0
0%
3
9%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
2
17%
4
7%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
22
35%
LEVEL 2
22
35%
LEVEL 3
15
24%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
13
38%
LEVEL 2
13
38%
LEVEL 3
7
21%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
White
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
13
42%
LEVEL 2
10
32%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
9
29%
LEVEL 2
12
39%
LEVEL 3
8
26%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
16
36%
LEVEL 2
17
38%
LEVEL 3
11
24%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
6
35%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
22
35%
LEVEL 2
22
35%
LEVEL 3
15
24%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
62
59
3
4
3
34
11
10
7
31
31
61
1
45
17
62
PROFICIENT
29%
_%
_%
_%
_%
24%
27%
20%
71%
26%
32%
_%
_%
27%
35%
29%
LEVEL 1
22
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
38%
3
27%
5
50%
1
14%
13
42%
9
29%
_
_
_
_
16
36%
6
35%
22
35%
LEVEL 2
22
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
38%
5
45%
3
30%
1
14%
10
32%
12
39%
_
_
_
_
17
38%
5
29%
22
35%
LEVEL 3
15
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
21%
1
9%
2
20%
5
71%
7
23%
8
26%
_
_
_
_
11
24%
4
24%
15
24%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
2
18%
0
0%
0
0%
1
3%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
12%
3
5%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 66
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
23
38%
LEVEL 3
33
54%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
16
47%
LEVEL 3
16
47%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
White
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
14
45%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
19
63%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
18
41%
LEVEL 3
24
55%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
9
53%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
23
38%
LEVEL 3
33
54%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
59
2
4
3
34
11
9
7
31
30
60
1
44
17
61
PROFICIENT
57%
_%
_%
_%
_%
50%
55%
78%
71%
48%
67%
_%
_%
55%
65%
57%
LEVEL 1
3
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
9%
1
11%
0
0%
3
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
6%
3
5%
LEVEL 2
23
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
47%
4
36%
1
11%
2
29%
13
42%
10
33%
_
_
_
_
18
41%
5
29%
23
38%
LEVEL 3
33
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
47%
5
45%
7
78%
5
71%
14
45%
19
63%
_
_
_
_
24
55%
9
53%
33
54%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
9%
0
0%
0
0%
1
3%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
12%
2
3%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
45
68%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
33
83%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
4
44%
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
65%
LEVEL 4
9
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
72%
LEVEL 4
7
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
33
69%
LEVEL 4
10
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
67%
LEVEL 4
6
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
45
68%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
65
1
1
5
40
9
11
6
37
29
63
3
48
18
66
PROFICIENT
92%
_%
_%
_%
_%
98%
89%
91%
67%
89%
97%
_%
_%
90%
100%
92%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
17%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
11%
0
0%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 3
45
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
83%
4
44%
5
45%
3
50%
24
65%
21
72%
_
_
_
_
33
69%
12
67%
45
68%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
15%
4
44%
5
45%
1
17%
9
24%
7
24%
_
_
_
_
10
21%
6
33%
16
24%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
58
88%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
37
93%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
5
83%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
31
84%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
27
93%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
42
88%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
89%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
58
88%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
65
1
1
5
40
9
11
6
37
29
63
3
48
18
66
PROFICIENT
92%
_%
_%
_%
_%
93%
100%
91%
83%
86%
100%
_%
_%
90%
100%
92%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
0
0%
1
9%
1
17%
4
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
8%
0
0%
4
6%
LEVEL 3
58
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
93%
9
100%
7
64%
5
83%
31
84%
27
93%
_
_
_
_
42
88%
16
89%
58
88%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
3
27%
0
0%
1
3%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
11%
3
5%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
51
77%
LEVEL 4
9
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
35
88%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
29
78%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
76%
LEVEL 4
5
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
38
79%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
72%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
51
77%
LEVEL 4
9
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
65
1
1
5
40
9
11
6
37
29
63
3
48
18
66
PROFICIENT
91%
_%
_%
_%
_%
93%
89%
91%
83%
89%
93%
_%
_%
90%
94%
91%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
17%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
11%
0
0%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
0
0%
2
3%
LEVEL 3
51
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
88%
7
78%
5
45%
4
67%
29
78%
22
76%
_
_
_
_
38
79%
13
72%
51
77%
LEVEL 4
9
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
11%
5
45%
1
17%
4
11%
5
17%
_
_
_
_
5
10%
4
22%
9
14%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
46
70%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
30
75%
LEVEL 4
8
20%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
29
78%
LEVEL 4
6
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
17
59%
LEVEL 4
10
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
34
71%
LEVEL 4
10
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
67%
LEVEL 4
6
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
46
70%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
65
1
1
5
40
9
11
6
37
29
63
3
48
18
66
PROFICIENT
94%
_%
_%
_%
_%
95%
100%
91%
83%
95%
93%
_%
_%
92%
100%
94%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 3
46
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
75%
7
78%
5
45%
4
67%
29
78%
17
59%
_
_
_
_
34
71%
12
67%
46
70%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
20%
2
22%
5
45%
1
17%
6
16%
10
34%
_
_
_
_
10
21%
6
33%
16
24%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
52
79%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
37
93%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
32
86%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
20
69%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
38
79%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
78%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
52
79%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
65
1
1
5
40
9
11
6
37
29
63
3
48
18
66
PROFICIENT
91%
_%
_%
_%
_%
98%
89%
91%
50%
92%
90%
_%
_%
88%
100%
91%
LEVEL 1
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
1
17%
0
0%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
0
0%
2
3%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
11%
0
0%
1
17%
1
3%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
0
0%
2
3%
LEVEL 3
52
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
93%
7
78%
5
45%
3
50%
32
86%
20
69%
_
_
_
_
38
79%
14
78%
52
79%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
11%
5
45%
0
0%
2
5%
6
21%
_
_
_
_
4
8%
4
22%
8
12%
Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
72
65
7
1
8
38
8
17
0
9
40
32
62
10
51
21
0
72
55
69
96%
62
95%
7
100%
_
_
_
_
38
100%
8
100%
17
100%
0
0%
9
100%
38
95%
31
97%
62
100%
7
70%
48
94%
21
100%
0
0%
69
96%
65
60
83%
54
83%
6
86%
_
_
_
_
34
89%
7
88%
15
88%
0
0%
8
89%
30
75%
30
94%
55
89%
5
50%
42
82%
18
86%
0
0%
60
83%
85
16
22%
16
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
26%
2
25%
4
24%
0
0%
2
22%
6
15%
10
31%
16
26%
0
0%
9
18%
7
33%
0
0%
16
22%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
96%
65
60
83%
85
16
22%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
95%
65
54
83%
85
16
25%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
100%
65
34
89%
85
10
26%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
2
25%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
15
88%
85
4
24%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
2
22%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
95%
65
30
75%
85
6
15%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
97%
65
30
94%
85
10
31%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
55
89%
85
16
26%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
70%
65
5
50%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
94%
65
42
82%
85
9
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
18
86%
85
7
33%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
96%
65
60
83%
85
16
22%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
95
89
6
4
5
52
14
20
0
9
60
35
91
4
63
32
0
95
55
84
88%
81
91%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
46
88%
13
93%
17
85%
0
0%
8
89%
55
92%
29
83%
_
_
_
_
56
89%
28
88%
0
0%
84
88%
65
73
77%
71
80%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
39
75%
13
93%
14
70%
0
0%
7
78%
48
80%
25
71%
_
_
_
_
47
75%
26
81%
0
0%
73
77%
85
6
6%
6
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
6%
1
7%
0
0%
0
0%
2
22%
4
7%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
3
9%
0
0%
6
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
88%
65
73
77%
85
6
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
81
91%
65
71
80%
85
6
7%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
2
33%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
88%
65
39
75%
85
3
6%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
93%
65
13
93%
85
1
7%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
14
70%
85
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
7
78%
85
2
22%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
92%
65
48
80%
85
4
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
83%
65
25
71%
85
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
89%
65
47
75%
85
3
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
88%
65
26
81%
85
3
9%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
88%
65
73
77%
85
6
6%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
49
47
2
3
4
21
10
11
0
7
27
22
47
2
31
18
0
49
55
45
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
95%
9
90%
11
100%
0
0%
5
71%
24
89%
21
95%
_
_
_
_
28
90%
17
94%
0
0%
45
92%
65
39
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
76%
8
80%
11
100%
0
0%
4
57%
20
74%
19
86%
_
_
_
_
24
77%
15
83%
0
0%
39
80%
85
3
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
1
10%
1
9%
0
0%
0
0%
1
4%
2
9%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
2
11%
0
0%
3
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
92%
65
39
80%
85
3
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
16
76%
85
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
8
80%
85
1
10%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
1
9%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
4
57%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
89%
65
20
74%
85
1
4%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
95%
65
19
86%
85
2
9%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
90%
65
24
77%
85
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
15
83%
85
2
11%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
92%
65
39
80%
85
3
6%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
29
29
0
0
2
17
2
8
0
12
18
11
28
1
15
14
0
29
55
15
52%
15
52%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
9
53%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
6
50%
9
50%
6
55%
_
_
_
_
7
47%
8
57%
0
0%
15
52%
65
9
31%
9
31%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
6
35%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
25%
5
28%
4
36%
_
_
_
_
6
40%
3
21%
0
0%
9
31%
85
2
7%
2
7%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
1
6%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
1
6%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
1
7%
0
0%
2
7%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
52%
65
9
31%
85
2
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
52%
65
9
31%
85
2
7%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
53%
65
6
35%
85
1
6%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
50%
65
3
25%
85
1
8%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
50%
65
5
28%
85
1
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
55%
65
4
36%
85
1
9%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
47%
65
6
40%
85
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
57%
65
3
21%
85
1
7%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
52%
65
9
31%
85
2
7%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
93
84
9
3
9
45
10
26
0
12
59
34
84
9
65
28
0
93
55
79
85%
72
86%
7
78%
_
_
_
_
37
82%
10
100%
21
81%
0
0%
11
92%
51
86%
28
82%
72
86%
7
78%
55
85%
24
86%
0
0%
79
85%
65
71
76%
65
77%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
33
73%
9
90%
19
73%
0
0%
10
83%
47
80%
24
71%
64
76%
7
78%
51
78%
20
71%
0
0%
71
76%
85
19
20%
19
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
9
20%
4
40%
6
23%
0
0%
0
0%
13
22%
6
18%
19
23%
0
0%
14
22%
5
18%
0
0%
19
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
85%
65
71
76%
85
19
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
86%
65
65
77%
85
19
23%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
6
67%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
82%
65
33
73%
85
9
20%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
9
90%
85
4
40%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
81%
65
19
73%
85
6
23%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
10
83%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
86%
65
47
80%
85
13
22%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
82%
65
24
71%
85
6
18%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
86%
65
64
76%
85
19
23%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
7
78%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
85%
65
51
78%
85
14
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
86%
65
20
71%
85
5
18%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
85%
65
71
76%
85
19
20%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
77
71
6
0
8
40
11
18
0
46
31
67
10
56
21
0
77
55
57
74%
55
77%
2
33%
0
0%
5
63%
28
70%
9
82%
15
83%
0
0%
31
67%
26
84%
51
76%
6
60%
40
71%
17
81%
0
0%
57
74%
65
51
66%
50
70%
1
17%
0
0%
5
63%
23
58%
8
73%
15
83%
0
0%
27
59%
24
77%
45
67%
6
60%
34
61%
17
81%
0
0%
51
66%
85
14
18%
14
20%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
7
18%
1
9%
6
33%
0
0%
3
7%
11
35%
13
19%
1
10%
6
11%
8
38%
0
0%
14
18%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
74%
65
51
66%
85
14
18%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
77%
65
50
70%
85
14
20%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
5
63%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
70%
65
23
58%
85
7
18%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
82%
65
8
73%
85
1
9%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
83%
65
15
83%
85
6
33%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
67%
65
27
59%
85
3
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
84%
65
24
77%
85
11
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
76%
65
45
67%
85
13
19%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
60%
65
6
60%
85
1
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
71%
65
34
61%
85
6
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
81%
65
17
81%
85
8
38%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
74%
65
51
66%
85
14
18%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
94
88
6
5
8
48
12
20
1
6
65
29
89
5
64
30
0
94
55
87
93%
83
94%
4
67%
_
_
7
88%
45
94%
11
92%
18
90%
_
_
6
100%
62
95%
25
86%
84
94%
3
60%
58
91%
29
97%
0
0%
87
93%
65
65
69%
62
70%
3
50%
_
_
3
38%
33
69%
11
92%
14
70%
_
_
4
67%
46
71%
19
66%
65
73%
0
0%
43
67%
22
73%
0
0%
65
69%
85
6
6%
5
6%
1
17%
_
_
0
0%
3
6%
1
8%
2
10%
_
_
0
0%
4
6%
2
7%
6
7%
0
0%
1
2%
5
17%
0
0%
6
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
93%
65
65
69%
85
6
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
94%
65
62
70%
85
5
6%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
67%
65
3
50%
85
1
17%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
3
38%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
94%
65
33
69%
85
3
6%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
11
92%
85
1
8%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
90%
65
14
70%
85
2
10%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
95%
65
46
71%
85
4
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
86%
65
19
66%
85
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
94%
65
65
73%
85
6
7%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
91%
65
43
67%
85
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
22
73%
85
5
17%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
93%
65
65
69%
85
6
6%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
53
50
3
3
2
21
12
15
0
5
33
20
53
0
35
18
0
53
55
40
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
62%
9
75%
13
87%
0
0%
5
100%
23
70%
17
85%
40
75%
0
0%
24
69%
16
89%
0
0%
40
75%
65
27
51%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
38%
9
75%
7
47%
0
0%
3
60%
14
42%
13
65%
27
51%
0
0%
15
43%
12
67%
0
0%
27
51%
85
3
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
1
7%
0
0%
1
20%
0
0%
3
15%
3
6%
0
0%
1
3%
2
11%
0
0%
3
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
75%
65
27
51%
85
3
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
62%
65
8
38%
85
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
75%
65
9
75%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
87%
65
7
47%
85
1
7%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
3
60%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
70%
65
14
42%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
13
65%
85
3
15%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
75%
65
27
51%
85
3
6%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
69%
65
15
43%
85
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
89%
65
12
67%
85
2
11%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
75%
65
27
51%
85
3
6%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
15
15
0
0
2
8
3
2
0
7
11
4
14
1
11
4
0
15
55
12
80%
12
80%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
6
75%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
6
86%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
12
80%
65
8
53%
8
53%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
6
75%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
8
53%
85
1
7%
1
7%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
7%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
80%
65
8
53%
85
1
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
80%
65
8
53%
85
1
7%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
6
75%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
2
29%
85
1
14%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
80%
65
8
53%
85
1
7%
Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
Global Studies
2
_
0
_
2
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
_
0
0%
1
_
0
0%
2
_
2
_
0
_
2
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
0
_
2
_
All Students
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
General Education
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Students with Disabilities
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Black or African American
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Hispanic or Latino
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
White
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Multiracial
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Small Group Total
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Female
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Male
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
English Language Learners
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Economically Disadvantaged
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Migrant
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Not Migrant
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2012 - 13)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
2
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
5
4
1
BEGINNING
0%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
20%
_
_
ADVANCED
60%
_
_
PROFICIENT
20%
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
4
3
1
BEGINNING
_
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
7
7
BEGINNING
0%
0%
INTERMEDIATE
29%
29%
ADVANCED
43%
43%
PROFICIENT
29%
29%
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
20%
ADVANCED
60%
PROFICIENT
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
29%
ADVANCED
43%
PROFICIENT
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
29%
ADVANCED
43%
PROFICIENT
29%
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
6
126
50
8
54
0
15
9
186
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
―
98%
―
―
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
243
6
126
50
8
53
0
15
9
185
PI
121
―
113
130
―
132
―
―
―
111
EAMO
75
―
50
52
―
92
―
―
―
58
Safe Harbor Target
75
―
50
52
―
92
―
―
―
58
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
243
PI
121
EAMO
75
Safe Harbor Target
75
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
126
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
126
PI
113
EAMO
50
Safe Harbor Target
50
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
50
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50
PI
130
EAMO
52
Safe Harbor Target
52
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
54
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
53
PI
132
EAMO
92
Safe Harbor Target
92
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
186
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
185
PI
111
EAMO
58
Safe Harbor Target
58
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
238
118
194
236
190
244
229
235
58
113
131
0
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
99%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
237
117
193
235
190
243
228
234
58
113
130
0
243
PI
120
129
119
123
118
121
125
124
153
117
125
―
121
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
238
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
237
PI
120
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
118
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
117
PI
129
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
194
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
193
PI
119
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
236
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
235
PI
123
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
190
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
190
PI
118
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
243
PI
121
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
228
PI
125
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
235
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
234
PI
124
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
58
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
58
PI
153
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
113
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
113
PI
117
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
125
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
243
PI
121
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
6
126
50
8
54
0
15
9
186
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
244
6
126
50
8
54
0
15
9
186
PI
107
―
100
118
―
107
―
―
―
101
EAMO
72
―
42
49
―
86
―
―
―
54
Safe Harbor Target
72
―
42
49
―
86
―
―
―
54
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
244
PI
107
EAMO
72
Safe Harbor Target
72
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
126
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
126
PI
100
EAMO
42
Safe Harbor Target
42
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
50
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50
PI
118
EAMO
49
Safe Harbor Target
49
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
54
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
107
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
86
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
186
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
PI
101
EAMO
54
Safe Harbor Target
54
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
238
118
194
236
190
244
229
235
58
113
131
0
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
238
118
194
236
190
244
229
235
58
113
131
0
244
PI
105
114
104
107
106
107
111
109
124
106
107
―
107
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
238
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
238
PI
105
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
118
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
118
PI
114
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
194
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
194
PI
104
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
236
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
236
PI
107
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
190
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
190
PI
106
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
244
PI
107
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
229
PI
111
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
235
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
235
PI
109
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
58
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
58
PI
124
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
113
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
113
PI
106
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
PI
107
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
244
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
244
PI
107
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
4
34
11
3
10
0
3
1
45
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
61
4
34
11
3
9
0
2
1
44
PI
152
―
147
―
―
―
―
―
―
150
EAMO
169
―
148
―
―
―
―
―
―
156
Progress Target
159
―
148
―
―
―
―
―
―
156
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
61
PI
152
EAMO
169
Progress Target
159
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
34
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
34
PI
147
EAMO
148
Progress Target
148
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
45
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
44
PI
150
EAMO
156
Progress Target
156
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
58
28
51
59
52
62
59
61
17
31
31
0
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
98%
98%
100%
98%
100%
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
27
50
58
52
61
59
60
17
30
31
0
61
PI
153
―
154
150
150
152
153
155
―
167
139
―
152
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
58
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
153
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
28
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
27
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
51
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50
PI
154
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
59
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
58
PI
150
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
52
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52
PI
150
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
61
PI
152
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
59
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
59
PI
153
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
61
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
155
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
31
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
30
PI
167
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
31
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
31
PI
139
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
61
PI
152
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
65
1
39
10
4
10
1
1
2
46
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
1
39
9
4
8
0
1
2
44
PI
146
―
141
―
―
―
―
―
―
139
EAMO
151
―
124
―
―
―
―
―
―
131
Safe Harbor Target
151
―
20
―
―
―
―
―
―
131
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
146
EAMO
151
Safe Harbor Target
151
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
141
EAMO
124
Safe Harbor Target
20
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
46
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
139
EAMO
131
Safe Harbor Target
131
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
64
26
55
61
55
64
64
63
19
29
36
0
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
22
52
57
53
61
60
59
17
27
34
0
61
PI
147
―
144
149
140
146
147
149
―
―
135
―
146
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
147
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
22
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
55
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
52
PI
144
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
61
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
149
Not White
12th Graders
55
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53
PI
140
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
146
General Education
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
147
English Proficient
12th Graders
63
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
59
PI
149
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
19
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
29
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
135
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
146
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
65
1
39
10
4
10
1
1
2
46
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
1
39
9
4
8
0
1
2
44
PI
107
―
100
―
―
―
―
―
―
102
EAMO
130
―
96
―
―
―
―
―
―
108
Safe Harbor Target
120
―
20
―
―
―
―
―
―
108
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
107
EAMO
130
Safe Harbor Target
120
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
100
EAMO
96
Safe Harbor Target
20
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
46
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
102
EAMO
108
Safe Harbor Target
108
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
64
26
55
61
55
64
64
63
19
29
36
0
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
22
52
57
53
61
60
59
17
27
34
0
61
PI
107
―
106
107
102
107
107
108
―
―
103
―
107
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
107
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
22
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
55
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
52
PI
106
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
61
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
107
Not White
12th Graders
55
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
53
PI
102
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
107
General Education
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
107
English Proficient
12th Graders
63
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
59
PI
108
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
19
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
29
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
103
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
107
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
121
―
113
130
―
132
―
―
―
111
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
107
―
100
118
―
107
―
―
―
101
Secondary-Level ELA PI
146
―
141
―
―
―
―
―
―
139
Secondary-Level MATH PI
107
―
100
―
―
―
―
―
―
102
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
120
0
114
124
0
120
0
0
0
113
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
121
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
107
Secondary-Level ELA PI
146
Secondary-Level MATH PI
107
Unweighted Combined PI
120
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
113
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
100
Secondary-Level ELA PI
141
Secondary-Level MATH PI
100
Unweighted Combined PI
114
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
130
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
118
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
124
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
132
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
107
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
120
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
111
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
101
Secondary-Level ELA PI
139
Secondary-Level MATH PI
102
Unweighted Combined PI
113
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
YES
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
0
30
9
2
10
0
2
0
36
Graduation Rate
98%
―
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
97%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
98%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
9
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
0
26
8
1
9
0
0
0
34
Graduation Rate
98%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
97%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
98%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
9
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
21
42
49
41
51
49
51
15
21
30
0
51
Graduation Rate
98%
―
100%
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
―
―
97%
―
98%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
18
36
43
35
44
44
44
10
21
23
0
44
Graduation Rate
98%
―
97%
98%
97%
98%
98%
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
42
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
98%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
41
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
98%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
98%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
97%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
98%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
18
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
43
Graduation Rate
98%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
98%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
98%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
98%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
12%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in NY State Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
12%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
