MS 53 BRIAN PICCOLO GRADES (6, 7, 8) ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

These data are filtered by: GRADES (6, 7, 8)

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

137

57%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

141

65%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

47

52%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

49

58%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

90

60%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

92

70%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

65

52%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

69

60%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

68

66%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

62

73%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

79

50%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

76

54%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

58

72%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

65

87%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

95

50%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

115

61%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

42

88%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

26

93%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

28

67%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

109

55%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

128

66%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

114

58%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

112

65%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

23

55%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

29

66%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.