Skip to Content
Main content

RICHMOND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,477
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,103

LEVEL 1

7,935

29%

LEVEL 2

10,691

39%

LEVEL 3

6,199

23%

LEVEL 4

2,278

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,148
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,129

LEVEL 1

7,464

28%

LEVEL 2

10,517

39%

LEVEL 3

6,539

24%

LEVEL 4

2,609

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,657
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,023

LEVEL 1

3,220

25%

LEVEL 2

5,146

40%

LEVEL 3

3,301

25%

LEVEL 4

1,356

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,140
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,202

LEVEL 1

2,940

22%

LEVEL 2

5,122

39%

LEVEL 3

3,559

27%

LEVEL 4

1,581

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,820
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,080

LEVEL 1

4,715

33%

LEVEL 2

5,545

39%

LEVEL 3

2,898

21%

LEVEL 4

922

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,008
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,927

LEVEL 1

4,524

32%

LEVEL 2

5,395

39%

LEVEL 3

2,980

21%

LEVEL 4

1,028

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

57

48%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

38

32%

LEVEL 2

49

41%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

38
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,110
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,133

LEVEL 1

279

13%

LEVEL 2

744

35%

LEVEL 3

707

33%

LEVEL 4

403

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,151
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,115

LEVEL 1

276

13%

LEVEL 2

688

33%

LEVEL 3

697

33%

LEVEL 4

454

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5,540
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,095

LEVEL 1

2,817

20%

LEVEL 2

5,738

41%

LEVEL 3

4,008

28%

LEVEL 4

1,532

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5,876
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,961

LEVEL 1

2,603

19%

LEVEL 2

5,482

39%

LEVEL 3

4,133

30%

LEVEL 4

1,743

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

546
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,868

LEVEL 1

1,960

51%

LEVEL 2

1,362

35%

LEVEL 3

447

12%

LEVEL 4

99

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

608
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,742

LEVEL 1

1,734

46%

LEVEL 2

1,400

37%

LEVEL 3

504

13%

LEVEL 4

104

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,215
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,768

LEVEL 1

2,812

42%

LEVEL 2

2,741

40%

LEVEL 3

984

15%

LEVEL 4

231

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,411
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,040

LEVEL 1

2,780

39%

LEVEL 2

2,849

40%

LEVEL 3

1,125

16%

LEVEL 4

286

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,075
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,982

LEVEL 1

4,007

19%

LEVEL 2

8,900

42%

LEVEL 3

5,847

28%

LEVEL 4

2,228

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,616
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,055

LEVEL 1

3,132

16%

LEVEL 2

8,307

41%

LEVEL 3

6,083

30%

LEVEL 4

2,533

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

402
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,121

LEVEL 1

3,928

64%

LEVEL 2

1,791

29%

LEVEL 3

352

6%

LEVEL 4

50

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

532
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,074

LEVEL 1

4,332

61%

LEVEL 2

2,210

31%

LEVEL 3

456

6%

LEVEL 4

76

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,453
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,820

LEVEL 1

6,974

27%

LEVEL 2

10,393

40%

LEVEL 3

6,178

24%

LEVEL 4

2,275

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,103
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,845

LEVEL 1

6,527

25%

LEVEL 2

10,215

40%

LEVEL 3

6,496

25%

LEVEL 4

2,607

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,283

LEVEL 1

961

75%

LEVEL 2

298

23%

LEVEL 3

21

2%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,284

LEVEL 1

937

73%

LEVEL 2

302

24%

LEVEL 3

43

3%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,855
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,547

LEVEL 1

1,656

16%

LEVEL 2

4,036

38%

LEVEL 3

3,356

32%

LEVEL 4

1,499

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,252
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,692

LEVEL 1

1,496

14%

LEVEL 2

3,944

37%

LEVEL 3

3,509

33%

LEVEL 4

1,743

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,622
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,556

LEVEL 1

6,279

38%

LEVEL 2

6,655

40%

LEVEL 3

2,843

17%

LEVEL 4

779

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,896
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,437

LEVEL 1

5,968

36%

LEVEL 2

6,573

40%

LEVEL 3

3,030

18%

LEVEL 4

866

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.