Skip to Content
Main content

ONONDAGA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,577
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,917

LEVEL 1

11,742

37%

LEVEL 2

10,598

33%

LEVEL 3

6,638

21%

LEVEL 4

2,939

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,159
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,449

LEVEL 1

11,683

38%

LEVEL 2

10,607

35%

LEVEL 3

6,093

20%

LEVEL 4

2,066

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,353
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,543

LEVEL 1

4,982

32%

LEVEL 2

5,208

34%

LEVEL 3

3,598

23%

LEVEL 4

1,755

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,568
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,823

LEVEL 1

4,981

34%

LEVEL 2

5,274

36%

LEVEL 3

3,347

23%

LEVEL 4

1,221

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,224
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,374

LEVEL 1

6,760

41%

LEVEL 2

5,390

33%

LEVEL 3

3,040

19%

LEVEL 4

1,184

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,591
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,626

LEVEL 1

6,702

43%

LEVEL 2

5,333

34%

LEVEL 3

2,746

18%

LEVEL 4

845

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

129
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

351

48%

LEVEL 2

254

35%

LEVEL 3

104

14%

LEVEL 4

25

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

136
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 849

LEVEL 1

412

49%

LEVEL 2

301

35%

LEVEL 3

118

14%

LEVEL 4

18

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

52
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

226

56%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

38
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

170

55%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

464
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,230

LEVEL 1

448

36%

LEVEL 2

318

26%

LEVEL 3

262

21%

LEVEL 4

202

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

417
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,261

LEVEL 1

514

41%

LEVEL 2

330

26%

LEVEL 3

257

20%

LEVEL 4

160

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,271
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,979

LEVEL 1

5,809

26%

LEVEL 2

7,899

36%

LEVEL 3

5,689

26%

LEVEL 4

2,582

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,964
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,619

LEVEL 1

5,695

28%

LEVEL 2

7,960

39%

LEVEL 3

5,161

25%

LEVEL 4

1,803

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

451
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,830

LEVEL 1

3,885

67%

LEVEL 2

1,494

26%

LEVEL 3

380

7%

LEVEL 4

71

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

408
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,660

LEVEL 1

3,850

68%

LEVEL 2

1,402

25%

LEVEL 3

349

6%

LEVEL 4

59

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

210
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,737

LEVEL 1

1,023

59%

LEVEL 2

504

29%

LEVEL 3

162

9%

LEVEL 4

48

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

196
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,752

LEVEL 1

1,042

59%

LEVEL 2

514

29%

LEVEL 3

171

10%

LEVEL 4

25

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,412
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,143

LEVEL 1

7,893

29%

LEVEL 2

9,838

36%

LEVEL 3

6,495

24%

LEVEL 4

2,917

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,023
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,978

LEVEL 1

8,006

31%

LEVEL 2

9,949

38%

LEVEL 3

5,972

23%

LEVEL 4

2,051

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

165
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,774

LEVEL 1

3,849

81%

LEVEL 2

760

16%

LEVEL 3

143

3%

LEVEL 4

22

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

136
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,471

LEVEL 1

3,677

82%

LEVEL 2

658

15%

LEVEL 3

121

3%

LEVEL 4

15

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,559
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,739

LEVEL 1

10,697

35%

LEVEL 2

10,483

34%

LEVEL 3

6,621

22%

LEVEL 4

2,938

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,143
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29,223

LEVEL 1

10,579

36%

LEVEL 2

10,501

36%

LEVEL 3

6,079

21%

LEVEL 4

2,064

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,178

LEVEL 1

1,045

89%

LEVEL 2

115

10%

LEVEL 3

17

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,226

LEVEL 1

1,104

90%

LEVEL 2

106

9%

LEVEL 3

14

1%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,946
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,292

LEVEL 1

3,771

21%

LEVEL 2

6,575

36%

LEVEL 3

5,288

29%

LEVEL 4

2,658

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,788
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,304

LEVEL 1

3,851

22%

LEVEL 2

6,665

39%

LEVEL 3

4,897

28%

LEVEL 4

1,891

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,631
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,625

LEVEL 1

7,971

59%

LEVEL 2

4,023

30%

LEVEL 3

1,350

10%

LEVEL 4

281

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,371
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,145

LEVEL 1

7,832

60%

LEVEL 2

3,942

30%

LEVEL 3

1,196

9%

LEVEL 4

175

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

9,577
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,910

LEVEL 1

11,737

37%

LEVEL 2

10,596

33%

LEVEL 3

6,638

21%

LEVEL 4

2,939

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

8,159
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,436

LEVEL 1

11,671

38%

LEVEL 2

10,606

35%

LEVEL 3

6,093

20%

LEVEL 4

2,066

7%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.