SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

307

36%

LEVEL 2

333

39%

LEVEL 3

177

21%

LEVEL 4

43

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 847

LEVEL 1

272

32%

LEVEL 2

344

41%

LEVEL 3

189

22%

LEVEL 4

42

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

130

30%

LEVEL 2

177

41%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

112

26%

LEVEL 2

174

41%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

177

41%

LEVEL 2

156

36%

LEVEL 3

81

19%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

160

38%

LEVEL 2

170

40%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

295

37%

LEVEL 2

307

38%

LEVEL 3

162

20%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 790

LEVEL 1

257

33%

LEVEL 2

324

41%

LEVEL 3

169

21%

LEVEL 4

40

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

202

27%

LEVEL 2

320

43%

LEVEL 3

174

24%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

169

24%

LEVEL 2

321

45%

LEVEL 3

186

26%

LEVEL 4

42

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

105

87%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

103

80%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

137

28%

LEVEL 2

187

39%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

98

23%

LEVEL 2

176

41%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

170

45%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

174

42%

LEVEL 2

168

40%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.