Skip to Content
Main content

MANCHESTER-SHORTSVILLE CSD (RED JACK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

132

33%

LEVEL 2

175

44%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

136

36%

LEVEL 2

154

41%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

87

46%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

81

39%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

84

44%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

120

33%

LEVEL 2

165

45%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

127

36%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

168

48%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

150

45%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

41

85%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

39

89%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

111

46%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

66

31%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

71

45%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.