ALEXANDER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

143

39%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

79

23%

LEVEL 2

137

40%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

80

23%

LEVEL 2

145

42%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

141

44%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

27

73%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

29

76%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

100

40%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

36

34%

LEVEL 2

47

44%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

50

45%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.