HARLEM PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

117

44%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

98

26%

LEVEL 2

174

46%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

73

50%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

86

44%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

54

45%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

88

48%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

30

32%

LEVEL 2

45

47%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

65

50%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

105

49%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

145

48%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

37

48%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

111

45%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

165

46%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

31

25%

LEVEL 2

64

52%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

98

44%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

110

43%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.