Skip to Content
Main content

BRUNO M PONTERIO RIDGE STREET SCHOO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

133

39%

LEVEL 4

78

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

146

45%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

50

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

71

42%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

76

46%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

75

47%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

12

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

122

40%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

131

46%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

130

40%

LEVEL 4

78

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

144

48%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.