Skip to Content
Main content

GREENVILLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

86

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

50

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

43

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

58

40%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

62

47%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

74
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

36

37%

LEVEL 4

38

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

76
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

44

45%

LEVEL 4

32

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

113

41%

LEVEL 4

84

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

108

44%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.