Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAMSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

125

41%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

80

25%

LEVEL 2

141

45%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

78

48%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

114

44%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

16

70%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

130

49%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

28

57%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

37

76%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

92

46%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

44

44%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

42

36%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.