Skip to Content
Main content

LEPTONDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

128

42%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

139

46%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

67

48%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

73

49%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

66

43%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

100

46%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

14

54%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

15

58%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

24

46%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

125

46%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

132

49%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

26

90%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

26

79%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

63

26%

LEVEL 2

102

43%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

24

38%

LEVEL 2

33

52%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.