Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN G BORDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

132

27%

LEVEL 2

187

38%

LEVEL 3

131

27%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

158

33%

LEVEL 2

174

36%

LEVEL 3

113

24%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

89

37%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

96

28%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

30

39%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

44

47%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

78

18%

LEVEL 2

177

42%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

101

24%

LEVEL 2

169

41%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

54

83%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

57

89%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

76

25%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

54

41%

LEVEL 2

56

43%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

82

48%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.