Skip to Content
Main content

NEW PALTZ MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

74

14%

LEVEL 2

195

38%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

92

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

85

21%

LEVEL 2

172

43%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

151
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

87

41%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

108

43%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

85

46%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

84

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

138

45%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

17

61%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

23

42%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

145

33%

LEVEL 4

92

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

154

46%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

48

60%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

42

66%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

87

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

143

45%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

38

48%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.