Skip to Content
Main content

TIOGA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

155

33%

LEVEL 2

184

40%

LEVEL 3

102

22%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

159

37%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

94

40%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

154

34%

LEVEL 2

176

39%

LEVEL 3

100

22%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

152

37%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

75

18%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

106

26%

LEVEL 2

178

44%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

111

29%

LEVEL 2

162

43%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

49

89%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

48

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

119

45%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

121

48%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.