Skip to Content
Main content

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

202

45%

LEVEL 2

153

34%

LEVEL 3

79

18%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

187

43%

LEVEL 2

147

34%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

81

39%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

121

51%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

108

49%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

189

45%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

77

18%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

177

43%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

145

38%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

57

89%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

64

34%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

126

56%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

123

51%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.