Skip to Content
Main content

APALACHIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

49

42%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

38

36%

LEVEL 2

45

43%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

34

35%

LEVEL 2

36

37%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

90

44%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

77

40%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

40

37%

LEVEL 2

54

50%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

36

42%

LEVEL 2

32

37%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.