Skip to Content
Main content

CANDOR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

145

41%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

143

44%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

77

47%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

81

51%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

127

39%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

130

44%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

97

32%

LEVEL 2

141

46%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

103

36%

LEVEL 2

131

46%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

40

91%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

40

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

74

46%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

79

48%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

94

56%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.