Skip to Content
Main content

ELDRED CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

97

32%

LEVEL 2

126

42%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

104

37%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

45

29%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

52

36%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

56

42%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

15

54%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

123

47%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

100

40%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

30

83%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

27

90%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

47

41%

LEVEL 2

46

40%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

49

46%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.