HAMPTON BAYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

97

30%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

93

29%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

104

34%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

58

38%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

76

47%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

115

41%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

27

84%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

24

92%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

108

43%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

46

75%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

47

84%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

64

38%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

63

35%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

66

43%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

67

53%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.