Skip to Content
Main content

WADING RIVER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

67

44%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

110

42%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

94

43%

LEVEL 3

91

41%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

39

63%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

69

35%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.