Skip to Content
Main content

UDALL ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

85

14%

LEVEL 2

300

50%

LEVEL 3

173

29%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

239

51%

LEVEL 3

128

27%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

150

49%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

118

50%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

150

51%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

121

51%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

79

14%

LEVEL 2

271

49%

LEVEL 3

164

30%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

216

52%

LEVEL 3

106

25%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

22

69%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

249

50%

LEVEL 3

164

33%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

214

53%

LEVEL 3

124

31%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

51

50%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

38

57%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

254

49%

LEVEL 3

160

31%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

203

50%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

46

55%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

16

24%

LEVEL 2

36

55%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.