NASSAKEAG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

148

39%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

133

40%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

69

42%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

47

28%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

13

42%

LEVEL 4

11

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

123

37%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

116

41%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

145

43%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

117

40%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

32

67%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

31

67%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

144

39%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.