HORNELL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

140

36%

LEVEL 2

176

45%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

147

39%

LEVEL 2

161

43%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

91

48%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

80

45%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

84

42%

LEVEL 2

85

42%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

87

43%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

123

35%

LEVEL 2

161

46%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

126

37%

LEVEL 2

151

44%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

165

51%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

153

49%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

53

80%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

56

86%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

82

53%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

63

52%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

126

49%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.