WATERLOO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

282

36%

LEVEL 2

314

40%

LEVEL 3

152

19%

LEVEL 4

34

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 721

LEVEL 1

262

36%

LEVEL 2

299

41%

LEVEL 3

123

17%

LEVEL 4

37

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

115

30%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

168

47%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

167

41%

LEVEL 2

162

40%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

160

44%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

247

35%

LEVEL 2

288

41%

LEVEL 3

139

20%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

228

35%

LEVEL 2

275

42%

LEVEL 3

110

17%

LEVEL 4

35

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

165

25%

LEVEL 2

302

46%

LEVEL 3

149

23%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

156

26%

LEVEL 2

284

47%

LEVEL 3

123

21%

LEVEL 4

37

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

117

89%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

106

88%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

113

27%

LEVEL 2

169

40%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

105

30%

LEVEL 2

140

40%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

169

46%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

157

42%

LEVEL 2

159

42%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.